1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

[Trade Thread] Wing Players to Possibly Trade For

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by Drexlerfan22, Apr 18, 2006.

  1. tiger0330

    tiger0330 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2003
    Messages:
    4,759
    Likes Received:
    63
    Have you seen Crawford play? This was his line tonight, he had 11 assists, the 10 FTs tell you he was slashing to the basket and the 0-7 from 3 pt indicate he is a streaky shooter. Hardly the one dimensional perimeter shooter that you describe, he could improve defensively but he can create his own shot, is athletic and has size all the things we are looking to draft for. He has been the Knicks best guard down the stretch so I think they keep him, they will looking to unload Francis whether or not LB stays and Marbury if LB stays.

    44 7-18 0-7 9-10 0 3 11 1 0 1 1 23
     
  2. Live

    Live Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2000
    Messages:
    2,025
    Likes Received:
    0
    Speaking of the Knicks moving players, what about Quentin Richardson? He's not necessarily on my 'Wish List', but he's young, affordable, and can play both ends.

    Also, NO TRADES FOR FUTURE #1s!!! The next few draft classes should be loaded, especially since all the HSers have to spend at least a year in school (A huge reason why this draft class is so.... ordinary). Move this year's #1 only!!!
     
  3. baller4life315

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2003
    Messages:
    12,692
    Likes Received:
    3,029
    I have seen him play a lot. I'm still a huge Francis fan and I foolishly bought NBA League Pass again so I have seen my fair share of Knicks games. Enough to tell you Crawford isn't what we need.

    Crawford is like the guard version of Antione Walker (aka Fatoine the Chucker). Athletically gifted and very talented basketball player with little brain or concept of efficiency. He's as streaky as they come and he's never been known as a high percentage shooter. He plays little defense and is pretty weak by a guard's standards. Which all makes you wonder if its a coincidence that every team he plays for never wins.

    Although, I will concede that if we are seriously ever going to add the much-needed third scorer it will most likely involve us taking a chance on a guy like Crawford. I just think we can do better, especially with a high lotto pick on the horizon. Let's see how the draft plays out before considering any risky investments.
     
  4. sbyang

    sbyang Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2002
    Messages:
    1,937
    Likes Received:
    43
    I disagree with Q being affordable, they'd have to take Jho's contract and send us a future 1st round pick to do that deal.
     
  5. CreepyFloyd

    CreepyFloyd Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2006
    Messages:
    1,458
    Likes Received:
    1
    Unfortunately, I live in NY and I've had the misfortune of watching the Knicks play a lot this season and I know Crawford is streaky, but I just dont see the lottery pick having the type of impact we need and I think Isiah would be willing to give up Jamal for the lottery pick....while it's true that Marbury and Francis and a few others on the Knicks are on the block, Crawford is signed for a much longer period of time than those other players (he has the longest contract out of any Knick), thus leading me to believe that he would be available as well....the reason I'm harping on this is because I think it's a realistic option and a definite upgrade at the 2
     
  6. tiger0330

    tiger0330 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2003
    Messages:
    4,759
    Likes Received:
    63
    If I was CD I would jump at the opportunity to trade our pick for Crawford. The big guard we want probably won't be there when we pick and our choices will likely be Mardy Collins, Ronnie Brewer or JJ if we select a guard. The draft is always a risk and I would always rather get a proven player like Crawford who can produce day one than take a shot on one of these guys. Now the player that the Knicks would want is the question.
     
  7. WoodlandsBoy

    WoodlandsBoy Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2001
    Messages:
    880
    Likes Received:
    4
    These guys all play TMACs position. TMAC can't play shoot guard.
     
  8. m_cable

    m_cable Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2002
    Messages:
    9,455
    Likes Received:
    73
    I wouldn't even think about trading the pick until draft day, when our turn comes up. Two years running they had shakeups at the top and highly rated players falling. Two years ago the suns gave away a #7 pick that turned out to be Luol Deng because they didn't think he'd be avaliable. And last year Green and Granger fell way out of the top 10.

    If there's even a microscopic chance that someone like Roy or Gay falls, we need to keep our pick until it's our turn.
     
  9. spankz141

    spankz141 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2006
    Messages:
    935
    Likes Received:
    355
    i accidently replied in the FA thread, that both darius miles and zack randolph want out of Portland according the realgm. They would be great fits with zack randolph at PF and darius miles at SG.
     
  10. jopatmc

    jopatmc Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2002
    Messages:
    15,370
    Likes Received:
    390
    No, Zach would be horrid here. All he does is jack up shots, doesn't play a lick of defense and does not play team ball. He's an overrated, spoiled black hole.

    Darius Miles is an enigma. If we could get him for very little I'd take a chance on him. Both of those guys obviously want out. But Darius does have defensive perimeter skills and does have a good mid-range game when he wants to play. I'd take a gamble on him, I wanted to see us go after him last offseason. But I can't see Van Gundy wanting him. He could play the 3 offensively for us and play the 2 defensively which is ideally what we would want. I think the mismatches with him and TMac on the floor together at the 2/3 spots would be tremendous. We could balance out his midrange game by then getting that 3 point shooting 4 man that Van Gundy wants on the floor. Then we go to mixing up roles again. Or we could decide to keep Stro (not going to happen) and put Yao on the floor with TMac, Stro, and Miles. How much more athletic can it get? Rafer should for sure get his 10 assists per game then.
     
  11. blahblehblah

    blahblehblah Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2006
    Messages:
    4,689
    Likes Received:
    3,832
    If darius miles cant get along with Paul Silas, Maurice Cheeks who he called the N word and Nate Mcmillan I dont know how you can think he would get along with JVG.
     
  12. jopatmc

    jopatmc Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2002
    Messages:
    15,370
    Likes Received:
    390


    I think the possibility is there because JVG got along with Spree. But I don't think JVG wants the hassle.
     
  13. dream2franchise

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2002
    Messages:
    2,292
    Likes Received:
    900
    JVG is anti-knuckle head. And miles is as knuckled-headed as you get.

    So we need to get rid of JVG. :D

    No Miles for me, he'll think he's the man on our team without realising this team is owned by the 111.
     
  14. KDavis

    KDavis Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2005
    Messages:
    589
    Likes Received:
    68
    Use the MLE on Bonzi Wells, Hes a rebounding machine, plays good defense and would be our third option. Imagine a Sura (Fingers Crossed), and Wells Backcourt we be one of the best rebounding teams in the leauge. Hell with that Backcourt we could even give Stro some minutes since he not a good rebounder anyway.
     
  15. Rox_fan_here

    Rox_fan_here Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2003
    Messages:
    2,022
    Likes Received:
    128
    I would love for this to happen, but I doubt that we can get him for that. I'm sure another team will offer him more.
     
  16. tiger0330

    tiger0330 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2003
    Messages:
    4,759
    Likes Received:
    63
    He's making 7M/year now. I think he's looking to get paid.
     
  17. giddyup

    giddyup Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2002
    Messages:
    20,466
    Likes Received:
    488
    You left out the word "only"...
     
  18. Since75

    Since75 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2000
    Messages:
    504
    Likes Received:
    67
    Since JVG feels we need a power forward who can shoot, I say we pursue Radmonivic(sp?). He can hit the 3 when he's open and would fit perfectly for the Rocket's offense. I also believe we should draft Randy Foye. Rafer is not and probably never will be the shooter we need at the 1 plus Foye is bigger and stronger with similar if not better handles. The fact that he is considered a combo guard doesn't matter. So was Sam Cassell and the guard we traded to Toronto.
     
  19. Since75

    Since75 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2000
    Messages:
    504
    Likes Received:
    67
    Adding to the same post. We also should see about the possibility to trading up to get either Roby from Colorado or Ager from Mich. St. That will give us a lineup of :

    Yao
    Tmac
    Radmonivic
    Foye
    Ager/ Roby

    Size plus shooters. Yao, Radmonivic and Tmac will have to hit the boards a little harder.
     
  20. ROXTXIA

    ROXTXIA Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2000
    Messages:
    20,887
    Likes Received:
    12,980
    I don't know about Jamal Crawford. The kid can score, but he still gives the impression of a stupid kid out there, and I don't see Van Grumpy tolerating Crawford and Stromile at the same time.

    Stranger things have happened, though.
     

Share This Page