I don't think there's a single angry curse word that compares to the filth of accusing someone of mocking 9/11 deaths or sympathizing with terrorists. And texxx you can go straight to hell with your fake act that that's a reasonable position to take rather than flatly dishonest slander. You know very well the things you accuse me of are not true and you repeat them anyway, again and again, simply because you have no better argument. From now on, whenever you spew that lying crap I'm going to ask you why you support lynching black people and having sex with children. Why do you support those things by the way? I know some people think those are great things to do, but I think they're horrible and I hope one day you'll agree with me about that.
It's not a fake act at all. I seriously have a problem with that line you keep repeating. You continue to repeat that mocking line of "oh, everything changed on 9/11". You need to learn that the phrase is horribly disrespectful and out of line. You haven't learned that to date. Instead you use it as a partisan comeback to further your message of hatred against the administration. Using a phrase as disrespectful as that one is for purely political purposes is sickening.
You're a liar, texxx. As you well know, I use that line to mock the Bush admin's use of the very same line to justify everything from unprecedented tax cuts for the rich to illegal spying on American citizens to preemptive wars against countries that present no threat to us to the erosion of basic civil liberties to race and religion baiting profiling to the general new McCarthyism you and your brother espouse. Every time anyone criticizes anything this admin has done, the lies it's told, the crimes it's committed they are answered with "9/11 changed everything." That is what I mock, not the deaths of innocent Americans. And you know that. But what I'd really like to know is why do you continue to support the lynching of blacks and the raping of children?
I'm glad to hear that you admit to using that extremely disrespectful line for political purposes. Exactly as I stated. You need to learn that the line is disrespectful. Your closed mind is not allowing you to see your errors. For that I am sorry.
I admit no such thing, because I don't do that. What is disrespectful is the admin's use of the line and its supporters' use of the line, and their and your continued exploitation of those deaths, for political purposes. You should be deeply ashamed of yourselves for that alone, not to mention the bull**** slander you continue to spew about everyone that disagrees with you being pro-terror. And, of course, not to mention your continued support of lynchings and child rape. Your silence on those issues is telling.
Dont flatter yourselftexxx. Considering your posts hardly have anything of subastance ever, I consider you a senseless poster. Unless your real name is Juwan Howard, you are not going to get under my skin. I am cool as a cucumber, only made to be cracked by Juwan. To be honest, you amuse me. Toddlers amuse me too but occassionaly, they too, show some intelligence. Just dont go Juwan on me. I have suffered for 2 seasons already.
You need to check your definition. Urban dictionary is free on the internet. If you have a hard time looking up the word and you are a picture kinda guy , just look for your image, alphabetically. If you are a picture thesaurus kinda guy, look up your pic and then look at the next one beside you. Chances are Juwan Howard is smiling pretty. Once you have done so, you may use the search button to go thru the threads in which you have posted, for examples. *hint* donkey thread comes to mind. *spank spank* More spankings than Juwan Howard gets on the court in a meaningless preseason game.
Well I guess, it is disturbing for me to look at them in motion and do random silly things, like clap their hands, smile at random people, roll around playfully. I guess it would have been more fun if they just randomly went around blowing things up. I cant demand too much off of a toddler though, so you will have to forgive me.
Want to borrow my sarcasm-o-meter? I can lend you one but you will need to get your own batteries. I havent used it in ages.
wow it's the 21st century texxx and you still think like this? you've had ample time to refute these allegations and you haven't, i feel sorry for you and your narrow-mindedness. i could only imagine what you think about arabs, muslims, and mexicans. batman jones i agree with everything you've said likewise for zboy....also, juwan is one of the worse things to ever happen to the rockets
i didnt quote the iranian ambassador, i presented an op-ed he wrote for the ny times of course the article is not an objective article, it's written by the iranian ambassador and he's presenting his country's position....nobody ever claimed it was objective.....the article you posted by rubin is somebody masqeurading around as an "objective analyst," but in reality is just an anti-arab and anti-muslim zionist look at these 2 articles: the un sec. gen is saying iran has a right to nuclear energy http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2006-04/07/content_4395115.htm and in this article, iran is saying that it is ready to negotiate with the us for a diplomatic solution, but the us is resisting http://news.ft.com/cms/s/76a939b6-c5bc-11da-b675-0000779e2340.html
My bad. I already addressed the bias. That hardly invalidates the arguments. You'll have to do better than that. And no offense, but its pretty amusing for you to write off a long argument because someone is biased, and THEN link to an op-ed piece written by the Iranian ambassador, lol. Alrighty then. Not sure why you went to the trouble as you seem to think it prudent to dismiss such biased opinions out of hand. As I indicated earlier, there are many salient points in the Rubin article. Caling him anti-whatever doesn't address those, especially when he goes to great lengths to incorporate ARAB scholars into his position, you joker. Certainly the ambassador for the country recently talking about wiping Israel off the map might not be the best source rely on. Of course, I've already addressed why the official positions released by the Iranian government should be met with hearty skepticism - I missed you addressing that. The right to have civilian nuclear power (your UN Sec Gen reference) is not the same as the right to have a weapons program (which is the controversy in case you've been living in a cave). Oh, xinhuanet - Chinese sources are a good example of the free press, lol. Funny, but that doesn't explain the EU referring the matter to the UNSC. Nice try.
you're guilty of the same thing you're accusing me of...you dismiss sources outright because of where they've originated instead of discussing what they say and the article by the financial times wasnt focusing on the unsc, it was focusing on iran's willilngness to negotiate outstanding issues directly with the us and the us resisting, which shows you who's really interested in peace and who's not
Batman's statement wasn't mocking 9/11 or anyone who died that day. It was mocking people like you, who try to use 9/11 for their own political rhetoric which is far more disrespectful than anything batman has done. A decent American would apologize for doing what you have done regarding 9/11.
i'd like to know what specifically changed for you after the 9/11 attack besides having a new catch phrase rebuttal to every legitimate point that is made on the bbs. be specific, how is YOUR life different after 9/11? what changes have YOU made to deal with the 9/11 aftermath?
