Watch this slideshow, it contains no misinformation, like "Loose Change" and "In Plane Site" do, two movies meant to confuse you by mixing fact with fiction. Here are all the facts put forth in an easy to understand manner. Please refrain from commenting until you have actually watched the slideshow. http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/wtc/index.html
I don't know if you posted this in 2 places on purpose or not. Either way, I hope you don't honestly believe any of that.
I wasn't sure if I should put it in the hangout or in the D&D. I figure the administrator will delete one of them and pick the appropriate place to keep it. I just thought it was interesting it was a link from another message board.
Damn, we were in the Hangout saying how this post was going to get moved into D&D and it's already in hee double posted.
To me, crap like this is why we will never get to the bottom of the who, why, and how of 9-11-01. BS like this impedes honest rational investigations.
I read the slideshow. It is utter baseless nonsense. The only person who would even begin to believe this is someone who wanted to believe it anyway.
Any conspiracy theory that involves thousands of people all keeping a secret is just plain dumb. Two people can't keep a secret when it is in their own best interest, and we're suppose to belive that thousands of people are keeping a secret that they could probably greatly profit from if they exposed it?
Mr. Madison, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul. --Billy Madison
Could you post the Roswell and JFK slideshows too please. Let's nail all these down today, then tomarrow we can look into Atlantis.
I think the question is not whom carried out 9/11, the real question in my mind relates more to the "why wasn't it prevented" part of it, which the government has been reluctant to be forthcoming with IMO, leading some to believe that there is some 'cover-up' going on (which could be true, but it's probably more of the "cover your arse" type so that careers could be protected). The main part I have trouble with is this: I am absolutely certain that some nations had the full knowledge of what was about to take place, and yet failed to fully report it or help prevent it from happening. Even more specifically, I want to know as to why Israeli Mossad agents were rolling their cameras BEFORE the first tower was hit and why they were jumping up and down with joy once it happened, as was reported by American citizens who happened to witness it and reported it to the FBI, who ended up arresting those guys. Did someone give these guys some material help or made it easier for them to carry out their objective? How did they learn to be so precise and error-free in carrying out these attacks when the absolute vast majority of experts have a hard time believing that a bunch of amateur pilots could be this precise in carrying out the strikes (especially in the case of the Pentagon, which is a low-lying building that's extremely difficult to hit with an airplane going at such a high speed)? So yes, I definitely have questions, but I do think the attack was physically carried out by those people responsible for it (whether it's Al-Qaeda or just some other terrorist organization/extremist group it doesn't matter). What I also DO know for a fact is that the 9/11 attack was used to achieve previous goals that had little to do with it, but it became a vehicle that politicians exploited to no end. So my questions have more to do with the details (i.e. behind-the-scene stuff and everything that happened in leading up to the 9/11 massacre).
Well, I am not one of them, I am a very skeptical person by nature, but it's not out of paranoia, I try to examine the details that no one wants to talk about; I like to examine 'red flags' (i.e. inconsistencies, technicalities, minor details) surrounding a story before I submit to its truthfulness or lack thereof. In this particular instance with regards to the 'official' version of 9/11, there are a lot of 'holes' and inconsistencies that I see. Suffice it for me to say this: we are nowhere near knowing the whole story.
Read the book- "Crossing the Rubicon" by Michael Ruppert I will send you a copy if you like. It is a very well researched investigation into 9-11 that has been endorsed by several congressmen. about 1000 verifiable foot notes. After reading that book you will have a very good understanding about how that tragic day was allowed to happen and for what purpose. At least you will be choking on the smoke and dumbfounded at the trail of evidence.
