Saw this at espn for the college ball lovers By Skip Bayless Page 2 If possible, March has been even Madder than usual. George Mason? Bradley? Wichita State? Yeah, I know, you had all three advancing to your Sweet 16. You had every Big 10 team -- from the conference with the highest RPI! -- losing the first weekend. You had Boston College surviving Pacific in double overtime and Connecticut coming from 12 down with 10½ minutes left to overcome Albany. Truly Madness. But of all the early You've Got to be Kiddings, the biggest shocker flew out of Dick Vitale's mouth after Thursday's games. Yes, I heard the Voice of College Basketball say right there on ESPN that Adam Morrison "will be a flat-out superstar in the NBA" and that Adam Morrison should be the first pick in the draft. You have really got to be kidding. Understand, I love Mr. Vitale. Love his wisdom, his energy, his crazy love of college basketball. I agree with him that Washington's Brandon Roy is America's most underrated star. But if Gonzaga's Adam Morrison is going to be a top-pick superstar, I'm Jim Morrison, the lizard king, and this is "The End." Does this look like a future NBA star to you? Then again, Larry Bird once had a cheesy 'stache too. An NBA superstar makes the All-Star team every year from his second season on. I'll be surprised if Morrison makes one All-Star team. Understand, Morrison is a terrific college basketball player and deserving of co-player of the year with Duke's J.J. Redick. Morrison will be a little better pro than two former terrific college players -- Keith Van Horn and Wally Szczerbiak -- turned out to be. But Vitale and other college-loving analysts have gone madder than March when they go gaga over Morrison's NBA potential. I don't know what made me cringe more: Having to watch those two geeks singing that takeoff of the "Gilligan's Island" theme in that over-and-over Applebee's commercial -- or hearing analyst upon analyst invoke the name of Larry Bird when gushing about Morrison. Poor Adam. He'll never be able to live up to this buildup. He'll have a hard enough time becoming the Next Peja, let alone the Next Bird. Sure, I'd like to see the Next American-bred White Star as much as the next white guy. No doubt I root for Canadian-bred Steve Nash because I can better relate to his freakish little-white-guy talent -- his unguardable agility, his ambidextrous hand-eye coordination and his spectacular feel for getting teammates their favorite open shots. But my job isn't to lose all objectivity and start playing to the majority-white crowd that loves America's Team, Gonzaga, and its college superstar with the Beatle bangs and the geeky mustache. Larry Bird had as pure a shooting stroke of any man who ever bounced a basketball. Morrison is a good shooter, not a great one. Bird, at 6-foot-9, had a virtually unblockable feet-on-the-floor, behind-the-head set shot that he could create with extraordinary step-back foot-and-hand quickness. Morrison, at a long-armed 6-8, shoots a jump shot. But it can be bothered by a long-armed defender because Morrison isn't exceptionally quick off the dribble and doesn't get especially high off the floor. NCAA Tournament Coverage • Scoop Jackson: Four days with the boys • DJ Gallo: What I learned • Mr. & Miss Bracket hits UConn • Complete Tournament coverage Though Bird wasn't a weight lifter, he had a big-boned stature and a nose for the ball -- a hard nose -- that made him one of the greatest below-the-rim rebounders (10.0 per game in his NBA career) this side of Dennis Rodman. Morrison's veins pop from weight-room dedication, but he doesn't play particularly strong and isn't much of a rebounder (5.5 rebounds per game). Morrison isn't much of a nose-to-nose defender; neither was Bird. Morrison has a knack for playing the passing lanes and leaving his man or area to make the occasional steal; so did Bird. But he doesn't have Bird's passing knack. Take your pick on which Final Four-making rival had the most basketball genius, Bird or Magic Johnson. Take your pick on the greatest passer ever who was 6-9 or above, Bird or Magic. I give Magic a slight edge. But I certainly wouldn't put Morrison in Bird's league for setting up teammates or making them better. Morrison has hit some big, late shots -- including some that lifted Gonzaga past Xavier in the first round. But come on, Larry Bird rivaled Michael Jordan as the greatest clutch shooter ever. And most of all, Larry Legend was one mean SOB. So far, Morrison has proven to be only extremely excitable and occasionally hotheaded. He'll get into trash-spewing shoving matches with defenders. But so far he doesn't appear to scare anyone but his coach, Mark Few, who had to yank him and let him cool off after he got into it with a couple of Indiana players Saturday night. So far, Morrison's temperament has proven to be more goofy than intimidating. After he pulled down a big late rebound against Xavier, he was so fired up he repeatedly banged himself in the forehead with the ball. Not sure Bird ever did that. Then, at the line, Morrison carried on an animated conversation with himself before launching a crucial free throw. Can't remember superstars Jordan or Magic doing that, but maybe the memory fails. Or maybe this poor kid is crumbling under the great-white-hype machine. Maybe, as the 10th or 12th pick, he could ease into his career and turn out to be a pretty good pro -- a starter for a playoff team. But if he's the No. 1 pick, he'll be in as much trouble as the team that takes him. But for the record, I've talked to a couple of NBA general managers who think Morrison could be better than I think. The night of Dec. 27, while Gonzaga played at Memphis, I was on the phone with one GM while Morrison was in the midst of scoring 34, including 4-of-6 3-pointers and 12-of-12 free throws. Twice the GM interrupted our conversation on another subject to say, "I love this kid. He isn't afraid." We hung up just before Memphis switched 6-foot-9 freshman Shawne Williams -- with a wingspan the width of the Mississippi -- onto Morrison. He didn't score for the final 9:31. Memphis won 83-72. An NBA preview? If Redick lands in the right spot, he'll turn out to be the more valuable pro because Redick isn't as all-around good as Morrison. That's right, Redick won't be expected to carry the Bobcats or the Knicks back to the Promised Land, as Morrison might be. Redick's role will be to spot up and shoot weakside 3-pointers -- which Redick already can do as well as any NBA specialist. Redick is a much better shooter than Morrison -- and if the Miami Heat had Redick right now, Detroit would be in trouble. Heck, if LeBron's Cleveland Cavaliers had him, Detroit would be saying, "Uh-oh." But if Miami or Cleveland had rookie "superstar" Morrison, neither would be significantly better. In fact, the reason Gonzaga had too many close games down the stretch against weak conference foes was that it got too caught up in Dickie V syndrome, trying to force the ball to Morrison. The reason Gonzaga had a fairly easy time (90-80) with a fairly average Indiana was that, while Morrison had a rough time getting clean shots and went 5-of-17 (0-of-3 3s), three of his teammates took the game over. It wasn't that Morrison routinely drew double-teams and fed them for open shots. He had one assist. It was that J.P. Batista, Sean Mallon and Erroll Knight looked like underrated college talents who now give Gonzaga a decent shot against UCLA. Adam Morrison, NBA superstar? Will he make a far better pro than Florida's 6-11 Joakim Noah? LSU's 6-9, 310-pound Glen "Big Baby" Davis? UConn's Rudy Gay, Josh Boone or Marcus Williams? Villanova's Allan Ray or Randy Foye? Texas' LaMarcus Aldridge or P.J. Tucker? Duke's Shelden Williams? Washington's Roy? I could go on. Would he be co-player of the year if LeBron or Carmelo were still in college? Dwight Howard? Sebastian Telfair? I could go on. But I leave that to Mr. Vitale http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=bayless/060320
The only purpose of that article is to be controversial ~ if Morrison was playing terrible in the tourney and everyone was down on him - then bayless would be saying he should be the number one pick.
In this year's draft, maybe. Personally, I would pass on the guy if we had a high pick. He is a very good college player but I don't see his game translating to the NBA. His game is all about himself, he would take every single shot if he could IMO. He isn't athletic and doesn't play defense. I do like his intensity and his fire, but he is a very selfish player IMO. The Larry Bird comparisons are absolutely ludicrious.
On the flipside... http://sports.yahoo.com/ncaab/news;...cB?slug=dw-morrison032106&prov=yhoo&type=lgns
Morrison isn't selfish at all. Yes, he shoots a lot, but he's leading the frigging country in scoring while being efficient and is by far the best player on his team. You'd rather he act like Rudy Gay and avoid anything resembling taking charge? And if anything, he's an underrated passer. Morrison is more Reggie Miller or Rip Hamilton than Larry Bird, but that's not a glamour comparison (nor does it take in the great white hope factor). He's constant motion and can hit his jumpers with efficiency. That translates very well to the NBA. He'll have issues defensively, but no one will enjoy having to guard him while he runs all over the place.
What does taking a charge have to do with being a scorer? (which is what Morrison basically is) I think those are much better comparisons but Reggie and Rip were/are much more athletic than Morrison. NBA guys might have to chase him around all night but I'm sure they are use to chasing guys much faster/quicker than Morrison. The reason why I'm not so high on Morrison is because he always wants the ball in his hands and he almost always wants to take the shot. He has bad shot selection IMO, and while he does make a lot of them in college, the NBA will be much different. I haven't seen a team-game from this guy and he isn't anywhere near the Kobe's or AI's for which it is "okay" to be selfish IMO, nor will he be.
If he is available when the Rockets pick (if not a top three pick) I'd take Morrison without batting an eye. The guy can flat out shoot and lord knows we could use some guys who can do that.
I think most people agree that Morrison can be a very good player. The main concern that I have is how he will deal will not being "the man" when he gets to the league. There's no way he can step in and take over a team in the NBA and I wonder how he'll respond to being a second, third or even 4th scoring option. I watch him play and I see him break up every other set play that the Zags run for Batista, Raivio, Mallon, etc. That works when you're the best player on the floor but would it work in the NBA? Wally Sczerbiak had this problem when he came out of Miami of Ohio some years back. He was by far the biggest star there, and I remember him simply taking over an entire NCAA tourney for them (scoring over 30 a game). When he got to the NBA, he was clearly a gifted player, but struggled in deferring to a more gifted player (Garnett). While Redick may be the less complete player, he can definitely contribute right away, and because his ability is quick-shooting he should fit into to an already established offense much quicker than a guy like Morrison.
Good post. I'm not too high on Redick either (thought that is chaning) but he is much more team oriented in the way he catches and shoots, very rarely will he get the ball and stop or try to create on his own. Obviously Morrison is much better at creating his own shot, but when the ball comes to you and you hold it, it quickly becomes an iso-situation, something all Rocket fans should quiver at the sound of it.
Great comparison to Wally, although Morrison's a bit bigger than Wally. Of course we'll take him if he's there when we pick; Wally Sczerbiak would have looked real good on this team with all those open shots. One good thing about taking a guy like Morrison or Redick: you know they are not afraid to shoot it. These guys won't let a certain style of offense or coach dictate how they play on the floor!
I like the kid and the fire he plays with. I actually think he would be perfect in a 6th-man role for a team. I could see the Rockets taking him depending on a couple factors, namely their draft position, and if guys like Redick are already taken. In the right draft scenario, he could be a sparkplug that this team definitely needs.
What Bayless has no idea about was Larry Bird in college. I saw him play extensively his last 2 years at Indiana State. Bird showed flashes of greatness and savvy in college, but he improved himself a lot AFTER he got to the pros. He was the classic gym rat who went all out during practice and was obsessed with getting better. In college, Bird played against very soft competition and destroyed them. He padded his stats big time in the 2nd half of blowout games. He had a sidekick player his senior year named Carl Nicks and the two of them together were dynamic. Watching their run to the NCAA Finals was great, but I watched MSU too and most of us who did knew ISU had little chance against them in the final game. My point: Morrison at Gonzaga compares quite well against Bird in college.
I could never get behind drafting a guy whose personal style/grooming ideal is the kid reporter from Almost Famous:
I just loved his interview.... "Bottom line.. I HATE TO LOSE." I think he's going to be fine in the NBA, I have a good feeling that he's similar to Bird in the head, if the Rockets find a way to get him we will win the West as soon as next season.
Agreed...Adam is the type of gamer you want and need on your team...I'd take him over Brokeback Reddick any day of the week...Adam should get the naismith (sp?), but JJ probably will just because he's from Duke...Duke is overrated...
Exactly. Did anyone else see the interview? At the press conference, for a few moments he was trying to talk about the game, all of a sudden he just snapped, must of thought "****! Why does this matter?", after that little moment he just summed up what he was feeling and said, "Bottom line... I HATE TO LOSE.", then he stared into the crowd, and Sports Center cut to another high light. Now maybe he is a selfish A-hole, maybe he was so pissed because he didn't get a chance to shine INDIVIDUALY on a brighter stage, but IMO the reason why shouldn't matter, this guy is extremely competitive and wants to win no matter the cost. That, along with his skills, is going to transfer into the NBA.