1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

[Review] Saw II

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout' started by Two Sandwiches, Oct 29, 2005.

  1. Two Sandwiches

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2002
    Messages:
    23,135
    Likes Received:
    15,071
    Took the gang out to see it tonight. It was GREAT. Very gory, though. Very thrilling. Overall, I thought it was just as good, if not better than the first.
     
  2. JunkyardDwg

    JunkyardDwg Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2000
    Messages:
    8,703
    Likes Received:
    841
    Some of the actors left a lot to be desired...otherwise it was just as good as the original and had a great ending. I would say the gore and squirm factor was taken up a notch too.
     
  3. Dave2000

    Dave2000 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2001
    Messages:
    11,091
    Likes Received:
    813
    Honestly, i thought the first was still better, but the second one is up there. The ending was sort of predictable but I didnt guess all of it.

    Still worth the price of admission :)
     
  4. ClutchCityReturns

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2005
    Messages:
    13,426
    Likes Received:
    2,664
    Just saw it too (no pun intended) and I thought it was as good as the original. In fact it was probably a little better than the original, since sequel's are always at a disadvantage to the original, yet I still liked both of them equally. Acting was better overall, but a couple of people definitely should have taken a couple more classes (the big guy and the chubby white dude in particular). On the flipside I thought Donny Whalberg and whoever the dude is that plays the mastermind were both really good in this. I didn't guess the ending, but I had my suspicions.

    GOOD movie overall. Better acting could have made it VERY good.
     
  5. ddly_tng

    ddly_tng Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2003
    Messages:
    231
    Likes Received:
    1
    I liked the movie, though not nearly as much as the first.

    It didn't have the same puzzle-solving novelty of the first movie alot of their actions seemed counter-intuitive unlike the first one where you could reason why the characters did what they did.

    Other than that, pretty good movie overall and definitely enough gore to last me for a while.
     
  6. Hakeem06

    Hakeem06 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2003
    Messages:
    1,855
    Likes Received:
    3
    very good movie. saw it last night. the first is always better but it picks up very well from where it left off. i liked it, i couldn't predict what was coming most of the time, which is always good. i don't like being able to predict what is going to happen. worth the money to see in the theater.
     
  7. Master Baiter

    Master Baiter Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2001
    Messages:
    9,608
    Likes Received:
    1,376
    The first one was so incredibly horrible that I would never pay to see II. The only thing about the first one that was entertaining was the sheer terribleness was comedic.
     
  8. DieHard Rocket

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2000
    Messages:
    9,413
    Likes Received:
    1,161
    If you liked the first one, you'll like the second one as well.

    I loved both of them mainly because of the concept and plot behind them. I usually end up laughing through "horror" movies because they are so ridiculously stupid and unrealistic.

    Not to say that what happens in "Saw" and "Saw II" is necessarily realistic, but as you watch it you can think about what you would do in their dilemma. That's why I like it so much. (Of course you have to have some kind of tolerance, or even like the gore).
     
  9. Ender120

    Ender120 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2003
    Messages:
    1,774
    Likes Received:
    171
    Seems most of the people that liked it also liked the first. I don't hear any "Well, I didn't care for the first one, but the second one really improved in all the areas the first was lacking and I liked it a lot."


    At this point, that's about the only thing that would make me feel a desire to see this movie. The first had too many plotholes and just very stupid things in it for me to be anything but extremely disappointed with it.



    I'm sure in the end, morbid curiousity will win out and I'll see Saw II.
     
  10. Rivaldo2181

    Rivaldo2181 Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2003
    Messages:
    2,480
    Likes Received:
    246
    I didn't see the first one until it came out on video b/c most horror films are crap but I really liked Saw and went to see Saw II on Friday night and I thought it was as good if not better than the original. It was intense, very gory, and kept the same theme of the first one but changed it up a little. Very entertaining movie.
     
  11. Davidoff

    Davidoff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    5,643
    Likes Received:
    9
    [​IMG]

    It was a great movie..

    [​IMG]

    FOR ME TO POOP ON!!

    SAW 1 was so bad it had me LMAO when the guy from the Princess Bride (Cary Elwes) was crying and pissed off through out the movie.. I do think it was the worst plot, and acting I have seen in a horror movie.. and I've seen lots of cheesy 80's horror movies..

    I wont be seeing part 2..
     
  12. Master Baiter

    Master Baiter Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2001
    Messages:
    9,608
    Likes Received:
    1,376
    I dont think that the plot was horrible, I actually thought that it had potential. It was just that the acting was so incredibly horrible that they could have never pulled it off. It was so bad that I was embarrassed for a lot of the actors in the movie.

    My favorite part was when the dude with the clown mask comes rolling up on a tricylce. I mean we were on the floor laughing. It was so ridiculous and not scary that it was comic genius.
     
  13. Billyp

    Billyp Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2005
    Messages:
    346
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yeah for me really, the first one was horrible. I've never been able to understand why people liked it either. The torture/death scenes were pretty cool I'll admit but not enough to make the movie good. If they had somehow combined those scenes with a movie like se7en then it would probably be pretty badass.
     
  14. FlyerFanatic

    FlyerFanatic YOU BOYS LIKE MEXICO!?! YEEEHAAWW
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2002
    Messages:
    7,457
    Likes Received:
    189
    I don't get the people who knock these movies for bad acting. I havent seen Saw 2, but saw the first one. The same knocking the acting occured then too, it seems realistic to me, people being messed with will freak out and who knows what they'll do, it wouldnt surprise me if people screamed and what not like they did in the movie, IMO.
     
  15. Got Em

    Got Em Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2003
    Messages:
    502
    Likes Received:
    1
    I just saw this movie last night with a lot of my friends and everybody liked it. The movie isn't perfect, but it does its job and scares the **** out of people. If you don't care too much about acting and enjoy plot twists, this will definitely be one of the BEST scary movies you'll see in years.
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now