trade exceptions are worthless now...

LOL. I was just doing a search for your comments on this...

http://bbs.clutchfans.net/showpost.php?p=1899017&postcount=17

And here...

http://bbs.clutchfans.net/showpost.php?p=1899091&postcount=25

 

I'm honored. Keyword definitively. That was (and still is) my instinct on the matter, but until we get text, it's all conjecture.

 

Thanks for the update Nike, let us know when you get the text and find an answer.

 

One of the best comeback I have ever seen. Luther is so clutch!

 

My bad I posted a reply in the wrong thread

 

Only thing I'd add is that a team that is not a taxpayer in 2005-06 may utilize an amnesty waiver for tax relief in future seasons, provided that it waives a player (or designates a previously waived player) prior to the start of the 2005-06 season.

So, if a team that is not currently being charged luxury tax waives a player under the amnesty rule this year, that team can use the waived player's contract for tax relief down the road.

The rules on this are not totally worked out, but this will allow teams other than the Knicks and Mavs to benefit from "amnesty."

 

when people say its a one time thing does that mean only one time up until the cba expires or what?

 

One time, one player this off-season.