1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

[Wired]Nine-Year Sentence for Spammer

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout' started by LegendZ3, Apr 9, 2005.

Tags:
  1. LegendZ3

    LegendZ3 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2002
    Messages:
    4,196
    Likes Received:
    5
    http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,67172,00.html?tw=rss.TOP

    11:54 AM Apr. 08, 2005 PT

    LEESBURG, Va. -- A Virginia judge sentenced a spammer to nine years in prison Friday in the nation's first felony prosecution for sending junk e-mail, though the sentence was postponed while the case is appealed.

    Loudoun County Circuit Judge Thomas Horne said that because the law targeting bulk e-mail distribution is new and raises constitutional questions, it was appropriate to defer the prison time until appeals courts rule.

    A jury had recommended the nine-year prison term after convicting Jeremy Jaynes of pumping out at least 10 million e-mails a day with the help of 16 high-speed lines, the kind of internet capacity a 1,000-employee company would need.

    Jaynes, of Raleigh, N.C., told the judge that regardless of how the appeal turns out, "I can guarantee the court I will not be involved in the e-mail marketing business again."

    The prosecutor, Lisa Hicks-Thomas, said she was pleased with the sentence and confident that the law would be upheld on appeal.

    "We're satisfied that the court upheld what 12 citizens of Virginia determined was an appropriate sentence — nine years in prison," Hicks-Thomas said.

    Defense attorney David Oblon argued in court that nine years was far too long given that Jaynes was charged as an out-of-state resident with violating a Virginia law that had taken effect just two weeks before.

    "We have no doubt that we will win on appeal," Oblon said outside court. "Therefore any sentence is somewhat moot. Still, the sentence is not what we recommended and we're disappointed."

    Jaynes declined to talk to reporters. He remains under $1 million bond.

    Though Oblon has never disputed that his client was a bulk e-mail distributor, he argued during the trial that the law was poorly crafted and that prosecutors never proved the e-mail was unsolicited. He also has said the law is an unconstitutional infringement of free speech.

    Under Virginia law, sending unsolicited bulk e-mail itself is not a crime unless the sender masks his identity. Prosecutors brought the case in Virginia because it is home to America Online, the leading internet service provider.

    Prosecutors have described Jaynes as among the top 10 spammers in the world at the time of his arrest, using the name "Gaven Stubberfield" and other aliases to peddle junk products and p*rnography. Prosecutors say he grossed up to $750,000 per month.

    The jury also convicted Jaynes's sister, Jessica DeGroot of Raleigh, but recommended only a $7,500 fine. Her conviction was later dismissed by the judge. A third defendant, Richard Rutkowski of Cary, N.C., was acquitted of all charges.

    End of story
     
  2. pirc1

    pirc1 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2002
    Messages:
    14,138
    Likes Received:
    1,882
    Good,

    A few more cases like this and there might be a little less spam.;)
     
  3. olliez

    olliez Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    2,124
    Likes Received:
    1
    Very Good !

    How about 15 years minimum ?

    :)
     
  4. PhiSlammaJamma

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 1999
    Messages:
    29,969
    Likes Received:
    8,053
    Day'um, $750,000/month gross for spamming. That is amazing. I never knew it really worked. But I hope this crackdown works. And I hope it works all around the world.
     
  5. TraJ

    TraJ Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 1999
    Messages:
    2,089
    Likes Received:
    2
    I hope we see more stories like this in the weeks to come. They only thing that would make it better is if they seized his assets and distributed them to various charities.
     
  6. MR. MEOWGI

    MR. MEOWGI Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2002
    Messages:
    14,382
    Likes Received:
    13
    Throw him in the splammer.
     
  7. Mr. Brightside

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2005
    Messages:
    18,965
    Likes Received:
    2,148
    gross injustice...let the spammers do want they want... if you don't like spam, don't read it. if you don't want spam, don't post you email address everywhere you go. :mad:
     
  8. pirc1

    pirc1 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2002
    Messages:
    14,138
    Likes Received:
    1,882
    Are you a spammer yourself?:rolleyes:
     
  9. Chance

    Chance Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2000
    Messages:
    3,664
    Likes Received:
    4
    You're taking the wrong side here pal. Spam is to the internet what cancer is to a body. It's ruining it. I guess you are into pop-ups, SPIM, and telemarketers too.
     

Share This Page