1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Japanese government approve changing history again

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by pirc1, Mar 30, 2005.

  1. pirc1

    pirc1 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2002
    Messages:
    14,137
    Likes Received:
    1,882
    What if American history book said slavery never happend or no Indians were killed? What about German histroy book said no Jews were killed in WWII? You hardly ever hear anything in the western media about these things.:rolleyes:

    Link

    Chinese and S.Koreans sue over Japan textbook
    TOKYO (Reuters) - A group of Chinese and South Koreans have sued a Japanese regional government over a textbook that critics say whitewashes Japan's militaristic past at a time of frayed ties between Japan and its two neighbours.

    Japan's Education Ministry approved the textbook, written by nationalist scholars for junior high schools, in 2001 despite strong protests from China and South Korea and a new version is expected to be approved early next month.

    The lawsuit, filed at a district court in Ehime prefecture in western Japan, seeks damages over decisions in 2001 and 2002 by Ehime's board of education to adopt the textbook for use at several junior high schools.

    "(The textbook) justifies and hides the facts of ... Japan's invasion in Asia and the Pacific Ocean region and distorts history," the plaintiffs said in the lawsuit on Wednesday .

    The suit was filed by around 260 plaintiffs, mostly South Koreans including over 50 parliamentarians.

    There were also 68 Chinese plaintiffs and several Japanese.

    They demanded that Ehime Governor Moriyuki Kato and several current and former members of the Ehime school board pay each plaintiff 10,000 yen in damages.

    They are also seeking published apologies in Chinese and South Korean newspapers, saying the board's decision to adopt the textbook had caused them mental anguish.

    Critics have attacked the history text for downplaying the 1937 Nanjing Massacre in China, the sexual slavery of women by the Japanese military, and for depicting World War Two as a war aimed at liberating other Asian countries.

    Although approved by the Education Ministry, only less than one percent of state school districts in Japan decided to use the textbook, which Japan said did not represent the government's official view of history.

    Ehime's school board became one of the rare exceptions when it adopted the textbook for use at several schools for the physically and mentally handicapped in 2001 and three ordinary state junior high schools in 2002.

    DIPLOMATIC FLARE-UP

    The textbook issue is back in the spotlight ahead of the expected approval of the new version. Critics are worried that more local school boards may decide to use it this time.

    The issue also seems set to flare up again as a diplomatic dispute.

    South Korean President Roh Moo-hyun said in a letter to the South Korean people this month that Seoul's determination to set Japan right on a territorial dispute over tiny islands claimed by both countries and the row over the history textbook "may cause stinging diplomatic war".

    On Wednesday, South Korean Foreign Minister Ban Ki-moon stressed the need to resolve the history issue and the dispute over the islands, called Tokto in Korea and Takeshima in Japan.

    "We believe it will be impossible to establish future-oriented relations with Japan in a genuine manner if we are to put the issues of Tokto and (colonial period) history aside," Ban said at a regular media briefing.

    There is lingering resentment in South Korea toward Japan's brutal 1910-1945 colonial rule over the Korean Peninsula.

    Japanese history textbooks, periodically updated under a system of screening by the Education Ministry, have often aroused fierce debate at home and in Asian countries invaded by Japan in the first half of the 20th century.

    Over the past two decades, Japanese textbooks have gradually included more critical accounts of Japan's military aggression.

    But that shift has prompted a backlash among Japanese nationalists, who criticised what they considered a "masochistic" view of history that deprived Japanese of pride and patriotism.
     
  2. kpsta

    kpsta Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2001
    Messages:
    2,654
    Likes Received:
    166
    Yeah, this isn't new by any means. Nationalists have been pushing these kinds of textbooks in Japan for years. It happens in other countries too... more than you might think.

    But still, it just doesn't look good any way you slice it.

    I know you haven't said/implied anything, but based on some things in the other threads in this forum recently... let's not make any generalizations about Japanese people based on this news item.
     
  3. Sishir Chang

    Sishir Chang Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2000
    Messages:
    11,064
    Likes Received:
    8
    Unfortunately this isn't surprising. The Japanese have continued to tip toe around facing up to their militaristic past and until they stop doing that they're always going to face some level of distrust throughout the rest of Asia.
     
  4. pirc1

    pirc1 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2002
    Messages:
    14,137
    Likes Received:
    1,882
    I agree this should not be generalized to all Japanese, but there is a group of Japanese that clearly do not believe in reality, and they have a lot of power in Japan.
     
  5. GladiatoRowdy

    GladiatoRowdy Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2002
    Messages:
    16,596
    Likes Received:
    496
    There are still people who don't believe that early Americans gave smallpox infested blankets to the Native Americans. Most textbooks for lower than college level gloss over the genocide of Native Americans, touting "Manifest Destiny" among other things.

    It happens to some extent in most countries.
     
  6. Deckard

    Deckard Blade Runner
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2002
    Messages:
    57,789
    Likes Received:
    41,219
    We have the same problem in this country, although it is a problem more on the state and local level. (I'll attempt to leave the unreality of the current Administration out of this!) There is a constant battle in Texas, for example, between religious extremists and the rest of the state's educators, about how to portray science in our textbooks.

    That the Japanese Education Ministry goes along with this is disturbing. The Japanese government has much to apologize for regarding the actions of the past. They should just do it and get it behind them. They are doing no favors to their neighbors in the region, the Japanese government's standing around the world, or the Japanese people.



    Keep D&D Civil!!
     
  7. JuanValdez

    JuanValdez Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 1999
    Messages:
    35,055
    Likes Received:
    15,229
    While the textbook may be a misleading propaganda tool, I don't see any basis for a lawsuit against them from foreign nationals.
     
  8. pirc1

    pirc1 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2002
    Messages:
    14,137
    Likes Received:
    1,882
    Does foreigners have no right to sue US government under any condition? I doubt Japanese court will do anything.
     
  9. SamCassell

    SamCassell Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 1999
    Messages:
    9,503
    Likes Received:
    2,358
    I guess it's not just the winners who write the history books.
     
  10. JuanValdez

    JuanValdez Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 1999
    Messages:
    35,055
    Likes Received:
    15,229
    I doubt the US would recognize any suit brought against them from foreigners. But, that they are foreigners is somewhat beside the point I was trying to make. What I was trying to say is, in what way is Japan required to bring an accurate portrayal of history to its own citizens? I understand how it's harmful for the Japanese, and even injurious to China and South Korea that Japan would cultivate misunderstandings of the history. But, why wouldn't Japan be free to do it anyway? I'd understand taking it to the World Court, or imposing sanctions, or letting the diplomats get testy, or invading the country and printing the textbooks they like. But, suing in a local court seems just weird. On what grounds can they complain?
     
  11. Sishir Chang

    Sishir Chang Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2000
    Messages:
    11,064
    Likes Received:
    8
    I believe the US does allow foreigners to sue the government as their are several lawsuits involving foreigners detained after 9/11 and I also believe the US allows for people to bring suits in the US against foreign governments. I seem to recall Germany allows foreigners to sue German individuals and companies in regard to Holocausts and Nazi rhetoric.

    Just throwing that out there for info. I have no idea what laws regarding these issues are like in Japan but I presume they would've thrown this case out already if the plaintiffs weren't able to show some standing.
     
  12. MFW2310

    MFW2310 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2002
    Messages:
    2,393
    Likes Received:
    0
    Actually the British did it first.
     
  13. Invisible Fan

    Invisible Fan Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2001
    Messages:
    45,954
    Likes Received:
    28,048
    The Economist always seems to be more balanced than other periodicals. I'm not a libertarian.

    China and Japan
     
  14. Deckard

    Deckard Blade Runner
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2002
    Messages:
    57,789
    Likes Received:
    41,219
    Thanks for the read, Invisible Fan. And you were right about it being a balanced article. Just curious... why mention that you aren't a Libertarian? Aren't they as common as the Houston Toad? Or the Circle C liberal?? ;)



    Keep D&D Civil!!
     

Share This Page