I am coming to the reality that Bush will be our next president, but this is why I'm nervous. Pollution permit program falters Many of state's 'dirty plants' big industrial facilities are slow to reduce emissions By BILL DAWSON Copyright 2000 Houston ChronicleEnvironment Writer Environmentalists have already branded Gov. George W. Bush's voluntary program for "grandfathered" polluters a failure, and now statistics indicate it is off to a sluggish start. No major industrial facilities have obtained voluntary permits or reduced emissions under the program, nearly 15 months after its creation, according to a draft report issued Wednesday by the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission. Thirty-seven companies have applied for the voluntary permits, and 125 others have promised in writing to apply by the program's expiration on Sept. 1, 2001, the TNRCC said. "Grandfathered" refers to the many older industrial facilities that state lawmakers exempted from a 1971 requirement for emission permits. Such permits often impose tighter pollution limits than general regulations. Because of other mandatory state programs -- including proposed smog-reduction plans for Houston and Dallas-Fort Worth -- about 23 percent of emissions from major grandfathered facilities will be eliminated, the report said. "What this report shows is that there has been a substantial level of activity dealing with these grandfathered facilities, though not so much yet in the pure (voluntary permit) arena," TNRCC Chairman Robert Huston said. The voluntary program has helped "raise the attention level" of industry officials about grandfathered emissions -- a carrot that complements the stick in other programs, Huston said. But the state director of the Sierra Club renewed the charge -- already leveled by environmentalists in September upon the voluntary program's first anniversary -- that the effort has flopped. The new TNRCC report reveals "dismal results," Ken Kramer said. "This is exactly what environmentalists and the public health community predicted would be the outcome of reliance on a voluntary approach," he said. A 1997 inventory by the TNRCC revealed that grandfathered facilities in Texas still released nearly 900,000 tons of air pollutants annually. Even the most stringent regulatory program would not erase all of it, however. After much agitation by environmentalists and others for an end to the permit exemption, the Legislature passed two laws dealing with the issue in 1999. In that year's electricity deregulation act, grandfathered utility plants were ordered to make pollution cuts. In the second law, other grandfathered facilities, such as oil refineries and chemical plants, were allowed to volunteer for a new kind of emission permit. Unlike regular TNRCC permits, these voluntary permits cannot be contested by the public in agency hearings. For two years, Bush steadfastly promoted the voluntary approach for all industries. But near the end of the 1999 legislative session, he agreed to the mandate for utility plants proposed in the Legislature. The governor's preference for a voluntary program was strongly criticized by Vice President Al Gore and his supporters in the presidential race. Once companies with grandfathered facilities have the opportunity to correct any erroneous data on the draft issued Wednesday, the TNRCC report will be presented to state legislators to consider in the session that starts in January. Kramer noted that the lawmakers who sponsored the 1999 bills "indicated that if the voluntary program was not successful, they'd come back and reconsider that (nonmandatory) approach." The TNRCC report supports "putting a mandatory end to the grandfathering of these dirty old industrial plants," he said. Huston would not predict what legislators may do, except to say that he expects they will not renew the voluntary program. He said he is "a little surprised we have not had more actual applications (for voluntary permits) to this point," but added that it is still too early to draw firm conclusions about what that means. "The report shows that thus far, 45 percent or so of (major grandfathered facilities') emissions have been subjected to some sort of agency process," Huston said. "And out of that, we actually are showing we have eliminated, or will eliminate as permits take hold, about half of that, so that's good news," he added. Until the voluntary program's scheduled expiration, Huston said he will focus on achieving pollution reductions at grandfathered facilities, regardless of the means. How the emission cuts happen "doesn't matter that much," he said. Now, how in the world are we supposed to trust someone who would support the continual polluting of the most polluted city in America rather than do the right thing and come down on the companies that are funding his campaigns? I don't have a problem with supporting industry, but most of the chemical plants in an around Houston, after being forced to change, eliminated the vast majority of their polluting plants by replacing them with more efficient one's. The grandfathered companies represent only about 20% of the total chemical refineries in and around Houston, yet they produce more than 98% of the total pollutants that come from refineries. That 98% represents more than 50% of the total pollutants in the air. The rest comes from cars. Faced with either dealing with the problem and protecting the health of his citizens the right way, Bush cowered to the polluters. So, in essence, our health is not as important as his campaign war chest. ------------------ Mmmmmmm. Sacrelicious.
I guess that scares me, but what really scares me is a Vice-President who is only looking out for himself by putting the country through this turmoil for his own vain gain. This is unprecedented for his challenge to certification. We are in uncharted waters and must let the rule of the law prevail. ------------------ Sometimes you gotta do the next best thing!
Why must every political discussion attempt to justify the actions of one candidate by bringing up something about the other candidate? Maybe with Bush as President, Texas can fix the grandfathering problem. Personally, I don't see this situation in the same level of black and white as you do, Jeff. (Black and white in the metaphorical sense, of course). There are always different interests that have to be balanced with any legislation. This was an attempt to make a balance. I assume that they had some hope of this plan working and probably had some people telling them that it would work. It didn't work, so let's try something else with more teeth. In every issue you find, there will be people on both sides of the issue who support their position passionately. Legislators often have to find the middle ground. Sometimes they fail to do that. But I'm not going to impugn their motives since I do not know for sure what motivated these people (including Democrats. Bills don't get out of the Texas House without Democratic support) to pass this Legislation. I just hope that they realize their attempt didn't work the way they thought it would and that they go back and give it another shot. ------------------ Houston Sports Board The Anti-Bud Adams Page
ROXRAN: I don't care about Gore. I didn't vote for him and don't really like him. This isn't about Gore. It's about Bush. mrpaige: The problem is that Bush ignored every recommendation including his own appointees to grandfather in these companies. He ignored the TNRCC. He ignored several republican state representatives. He even ignored several chemical industry groups that supported plant upgrades over shutdowns as a way to incorporate new technology. Instead, he just said, "Oh, will just let them be on the honor system." As much as I don't trust the government, I trust industry even less. They would rather pollute the VERY AIR THEIR EMPLOYEES BREATHE than cost their shareholders a few bucks. Awful. ------------------ Mmmmmmm. Sacrelicious.
It wasn't just "he", though. There were at least 92 other people responsible for the Legislation, as well. If there were Republicans state reps against the plan, they were the minority. There was obviously support in the Texas House and Senate for the bill. It ended up being a mistake, but even the people who sponsored the law said they'd revisit the issue if the companies didn't comply. ------------------ Houston Sports Board The Anti-Bud Adams Page
Luckily the majority of our country cares about the enviroment. ------------------ Ceo of the Walt Williams fan club. Web site coming soon atheistalliance.org [This message has been edited by DEANBCURTIS (edited November 30, 2000).]
This is not suprising. . . remember Bush is trying to get back to Good ole Reaganomics one word: DEREGULATION S&L Crisis??? anyone. . .anyone bueler bueller?? [hhhhmmmmm Didn't Dubya make a mint on a deregulated S&L?] Rocket River ------------------
"Something 'doo' economics... Voo-doo economics" --Ferris Bueller's Day Off ------------------ Jazzkiller