Remember the vote for the 87 billion before the vote against it.

FranchiseBlade · Feb 1, 2005

Kerry took a lot of hell for that comment. One of the reasons why Kerry did vote one version of the bill to fund the 87 billion dollars to Iraq that lost was because it had accountability.

That bill lost and Kerry voted against the subsequent bill that didn't include accountability. Had the bill Kerry voted for passed, and the other bill failed, then maybe there wouldn't be nearly 9 billion dollars missing now. The reconstruction effort would still have gotten it's 87 billion dollars, and it wouldn't have added to the national debt.

Instead we have this. And the move which actually prevented govt. waste was used against Kerry, by the Bush campaign.

Iraq unable to account for US$ 8.8 billion

2005-02-02 / Agence France-Presse /

The Coalition Provisional Authority that governed Iraq until last June under former U.S. Ambassador L. Paul Bremer is unable to properly account for US$8.8 billion that it transferred to the interim Iraqi government, an audit has found.

In a scathing review, the CPA's inspector general said the occupation authority failed to implement adequate controls over the money even after a warning that the financial systems at one ministry was open to fraud, kickbacks and misappropriation of funds.

"Specifically, the CPA disbursed over US$8.8 billion in DFI (Development Fund for Iraq) funds without assurances the monies were properly used or accounted for," said the report by Stuart Bowen, the CPA inspector general.

Bowen said there was no assurance that the money was not used to pay salaries of thousands of "ghost" employees.

The CPA authorized payment of funds for 74,000 guards even though the guards or the number of sites to be guarded were never validated, the report said.

At one ministry, 8,026 guards were on the payroll but the existence of only 602 guards could be validated. At another ministry, the CPA authorized funds for 1,471 guards but only 642 guards could be shown to exist.

"However, when the CPA staff recommended that the Iraqi Ministry of Finance require certified payrolls prior to salary payments, CPA Ministry of Finance personnel stated the CPA would rather overpay salaries than risk not paying employees and inciting violence," the report said.

Bremer took issue with the audit's conclusions, arguing in a eight-page rebuttal that the inspector general had failed to understand the context in which the CPA was operating.

"The IG auditors presume that the coalition could achieve a standard of budgetary transparency and execution which even peaceful western nations would have trouble meeting within a year, especially in the midst of a war," he wrote.

"Given the situation the CPA founding Iraq at liberation, this is an unrealistic standard," he said.

The Development Fund for Iraq was established under U.N. Security Council Resolution 1483, which authorized the CPA to administer Iraqi oil revenues and other funds provided it be done in a transparent manner in behalf of the Iraqi people.

Outside assessments and allegations of corruption by Iraqi ministries in the U.N. oil-for-food program should have raised concerns about the ministries' ability to administer the money without oversight, Bowen said.

A management consultant for the U.S. Agency for International Development concluded after reviewing one ministry's US$435 million budget that "the financial process was open to fraud, kickbacks and misappropriation of funds," the report said.

To comply with the transparency requirements, the CPA published the Iraqi national budgets and the amounts disbursed to Iraqi ministries on the Internet.

But the review found that the CPA did not maintain adequate documentation to support budget disbursements. So, it was unable to explain significant differences between spending plans, budget disbursements and cash allocations.

"For example, approximately 1.5 billion dollars in cash allocations were made to Iraqi banks between January and April 2004 for operating expenses, yet spending plans supported only approximately US$498 million in operating expenses," the report said.

The report said CPA senior advisers to Iraqi ministries did not have clear guidance on their oversight responsibilities, there were shortfalls in personnel in CPA budget and finance staffs, and a high turnover of personnel in key financial management positions.

Senior CPA advisers did not review internal financial controls in Iraqi ministries, nor did they compare financial, budgetary or operational performance to plans, the report said.

The CPA awarded a 1.4 million dollar contract to a NorthStar Consultants Inc. in October 2003 to evaluate the design and effectiveness of the internal controls over the Development Fund for Iraq.

But the inspector general found that they "were not certified public accountants and did not perform a review of internal controls as required by the contract."

Instead, the CPA's comptroller verbally changed the contract and had them perform accounting duties in his office, the report said.

http://www.etaiwannews.com/World/2005/02/02/1107310915.htm
Click to expand...

Cohen · Feb 1, 2005

FB,

You can look at who was in the 'right' and then who was more politically adroit. Both sides would argue the first point, but I imagine many Kerry supporters would concede the 2nd to Bush and his team. I do.

FranchiseBlade · Feb 1, 2005

Originally posted by Cohen
FB,

You can look at who was in the 'right' and then who was more politically adroit. Both sides would argue the first point, but I imagine many Kerry supporters would concede the 2nd to Bush and his team. I do.
Click to expand...

I agree that the Bush side was far more politically adroit, and it worked.

To me that is more profound than the fact that the bill that past allowed this kind of waste to happen, while there was a bill out there that prevented it, and didn't add to the deficit.

I agree 100% that they used this as a political attack on Kerry. It just shows that smart votes, and bills can be twisted to be effectively used against a person in today's political climate. That is a sad thing. If I bought into that line of bull from Rove & Company I would probably feel duped after realizing that I held Kerry in a negatvie light for something that turns out he was correct about.

As for arguing which side was right, I don't think there is any question that a bill which makes puts accountability with that kind of money as a priority is better than a bill which doesn't. This is only proof of that.

Forums

Remember the vote for the 87 billion before the vote against it.

FranchiseBlade Member
Supporting Member

Cohen Member

FranchiseBlade Member
Supporting Member

Share This Page

About ClutchFans

Rockets Content

Support ClutchFans!

Remember the vote for the 87 billion before the vote against it.

FranchiseBlade Member Supporting Member

Cohen Member

FranchiseBlade Member Supporting Member

Share This Page

FranchiseBlade Member
Supporting Member

FranchiseBlade Member
Supporting Member