1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

What's the Matter with Kansas? How Conservatives Won the Heart of America

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by No Worries, Jan 27, 2005.

  1. No Worries

    No Worries Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 1999
    Messages:
    32,938
    Likes Received:
    20,736
    What's the Matter with Kansas? How Conservatives Won the Heart of America
    by Thomas Frank

    Has anyone read this book? I read the below book review and was intrigued.

    ----

    http://www.frontlist.com/detail/0805073396

    What's the Matter with Kansas?
    How Conservatives Won the Heart of America
    by Thomas Frank
    Henry Holt and Co.
    Due/Published June 2004, 320 pages, cloth
    ISBN 0805073396

    Frank turns his eye on what he calls the "thirty-year backlash"--the populist revolt against a supposedly liberal establishment. The high point of that backlash is the Republican Party's success in building the most unnatural of alliances: between blue-collar Midwesterners and Wall Street business interests, workers and bosses, populists and right-wingers.

    In asking "what 's the matter with Kansas?"--how a place famous for its radicalism became one of the most conservative states in the union--Frank, a native Kansan and onetime Republican, seeks to answer some broader American riddles: Why do so many of us vote against our economic interests? Where's the outrage at corporate manipulators? And whatever happened to middle-American progressivism? The questions are urgent as well as provocative. Frank answers them by examining pop conservatism--the bestsellers, the radio talk shows, the vicious political combat--and showing how our long culture wars have left us with an electorate far more concerned with their leaders' "values" and down-home qualities than with their stands on hard questions of policy.

    What's the Matter with Kansas? presents a critical assessment of who we are, while telling a remarkable story of how a group of frat boys, lawyers, and CEOs came to convince a nation that they spoke on behalf of the People.

    Review

    Frank’s latest piece of scathing cultural criticism, What’s the Matter With Kansas, also illuminates how “liberalism” has evolved from a conscientious watchword for the downtrodden masses to a generic dirty name. Specifically, Frank shows how his home state of Kansas went from being a hotbed of Populism to a place where even (in fact, especially) the poorest of the poor are Right as can be. Conservatives have won the hearts of working-class people fed up with what they see as the degradation of their way of life by focusing constituents’ attention on cultural issues like abortion, the teaching of evolution, and prayer in schools, even as they champion an economic policy that erodes small town community. As incentive for keeping production of its new 7E7 at its Wichita plant, Boeing demands a raft of bonds and tax breaks from the city in a year when the budget can barely sustain teachers’ salaries. When it gets them, Boeing sends half the jobs to Puget Sound anyway, and then announces plans to sell the plant. Though vehement, Frank is also infinitely sympathetic. As he, a former Republican himself, recounts neighbors having to poll at country clubs where they are excluded from membership, and witnesses the poverty of his South Side Chicago neighborhood paling next to the desolation of the “heartland”, Frank describes his own gravitation to the left. To understand the paradoxes, though, he interviews people from all walks of life — from a regular factory line worker to respected politicians and Pope Michael I of Kansas — who have made the opposite move. A fascinating study not only of shifts in the political spectrum, but of the practice of politics, the book shows the fallacies built into the “red state/blue state” myth, how the Freedom to Farm Act has destroyed family farms, how conservatives co-opt the liberal rhetoric of victimization and anti-abortionists lay claim to the righteous abolitionist mantle, and why conservative Republicans so loathe their moderate party-mates, the “RINOs,” or “Republicans in Name Only”. The latest from the author of One Market Under God and The Conquest of Cool, is a bold and invaluable work in today’s capricious political climate.
     
  2. thegary

    thegary Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2002
    Messages:
    11,018
    Likes Received:
    3,145
    i'll give you a quick review:
    hillbilly neocons don't like this book
     
  3. wouldabeen23

    wouldabeen23 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2002
    Messages:
    2,026
    Likes Received:
    270
    "Ehh...Bob Dole won't read this book because Bob Dole is to busy with Viagra..."
     
  4. glynch

    glynch Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2000
    Messages:
    18,096
    Likes Received:
    3,607
    Conservatives have won the hearts of working-class people fed up with what they see as the degradation of their way of life by focusing constituents’ attention on cultural issues like abortion, the teaching of evolution, and prayer in schools, even as they champion an economic policy that erodes small town community. As incentive for keeping production of its new 7E7 at its Wichita plant, Boeing demands a raft of bonds and tax breaks from the city in a year when the budget can barely sustain teachers’ salaries. When it gets them, Boeing sends half the jobs to Puget Sound anyway, and then announces plans to sell the plant.

    It is sad to see these folks fall for the folksy elitist George Herbert Walker Bush of Andover, Yale and Harvard.
     
  5. RocketMan Tex

    RocketMan Tex Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 1999
    Messages:
    18,452
    Likes Received:
    119
    Ever seen a pic of his wife? I'd need Viagra, a bottle of Crown, and a blindfold.
     
  6. DaDakota

    DaDakota Balance wins
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 1999
    Messages:
    129,422
    Likes Received:
    39,985
    Why is it always something is wrong with the people?

    When in reality it should be, something is wrong with the message.

    Everyone gets a vote, no whining if your guy did not win...they should have gotten closer to what the American people wanted.

    DD
     
  7. thegary

    thegary Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2002
    Messages:
    11,018
    Likes Received:
    3,145
    dude, the book came out before the election.
     
  8. DaDakota

    DaDakota Balance wins
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 1999
    Messages:
    129,422
    Likes Received:
    39,985
    Not talking about the book.

    And I voted for Kerry.

    DD
     
  9. No Worries

    No Worries Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 1999
    Messages:
    32,938
    Likes Received:
    20,736
    I think that the book makes this point.
     
  10. DonnyMost

    DonnyMost Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2003
    Messages:
    48,993
    Likes Received:
    19,938
    God, guns and gays?
     
  11. HootOwl

    HootOwl Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2002
    Messages:
    113
    Likes Received:
    2
    I read some excepts from it a few months back. I want to say in the New Yorker, but that might be wrong.

    I am going to read the book though -- Thomas Frank is a fantastic author and a great cultural commentator. Conquest of Cool is one of the best books on the evolution of modern advertising I've read. I miss the Baffler.
     
  12. francis 4 prez

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2001
    Messages:
    22,025
    Likes Received:
    4,552
    if all he says is true then how are conservatives just so damn good at playing the game and liberals so bad?
     
  13. FranchiseBlade

    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2002
    Messages:
    51,814
    Likes Received:
    20,474
    Priorities, and one party being naive.
     
  14. ima_drummer2k

    ima_drummer2k Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2002
    Messages:
    36,425
    Likes Received:
    9,374
    OK, thanks. That's really profound.
     
  15. Refman

    Refman Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2002
    Messages:
    13,674
    Likes Received:
    312
    As opposed to the wooden elitist Al Gore of Harvard?

    Give me a break glynch. You don't really pretend that both sides of the aisle aren't elitist, do you?
     
  16. No Worries

    No Worries Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 1999
    Messages:
    32,938
    Likes Received:
    20,736
    Arrogant more than naive. The Democrats controlled Congress far so long, that when they lost control in the 90s they were in serious denial about the sea change that happened. The Dems still are pretending that small changes here or there will get them back on top.
     
  17. FranchiseBlade

    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2002
    Messages:
    51,814
    Likes Received:
    20,474
    I think only one side pretends their candidate isn't elitist. The other side sees that both are, and laughs at one for trying to label the other as an elitist and turn it into a negative.
     
  18. FranchiseBlade

    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2002
    Messages:
    51,814
    Likes Received:
    20,474
    I say naive because I really don't think Democrats ever expected people to get so upset about the Monica thing. I think they believed the citizens would look at issues, crimes, dishonesty, and a failure to hold anyone accountable for the mistakes this administration has made, and that those things would have a stronger role in deciding the recent election more than they did.

    I think they were naive when they believed that the GOP and media lie about Gore claiming he invented the internet, or the Love Canal, bs that was spread, would actually have an effect on the way people saw Al Gore.

    I think they were naive when they thought people wouldn't vote for someone because their voice cracked and was loud on television microphones even if it was the appropriate level for people at the hall.

    I honestly think Democrats didn't believe those things mattered that much, and that real important issues such as debt, education, jobs, war, and all that mattered more.

    They may also be arrogant, or clueless, but I do think they were naive. If they knew that the American folks were so up in arms about things like Monica they had even more ammunition to use against the GOP, and would have used it if they thought it would have helped them. But they weren't even thinking like that, and were slow to react once the ball started rolling.
     

Share This Page