The Rape Gang Inquiry Report

I thought nothing says Republican like discriminating based on religion, race, or anything

https://www.texastribune.org/2026/06/15/texas-republican-party-convention-muslims-sharia-law/

A Muslim Texan sought to find his place in the party at the state GOP convention. He left in tears.



Rocket River

 

Boohoo. I wonder if we can go to their countries and be Christian and still be part of their movement to destroy all “infidels”. Don’t forget to cry about that too. What a sad injustice.

suicidal empathy is a massive grift

Is it just “white people bad” posts with you? Do anything else?

 

There's thousands of churches in India lol and there's a higher percentage of Christians in India vs Muslims in America. It's just so revealing how you expose yourself as a braindead moron time after time. There's millions of Christians that live in muslim countries throughout the ME

You are literally dumber than a bag of rocks

This dumbass @Tomstro posted a video of people praying on private property and thought it was public property. These people get their entire knowledge from social media and are brainwashed to the max.

 

Not sure why you think revealing was referring to racist... but anyhow...

You didn't answer the question. Let me post it again:

To keep the logic consistent, if 10% of any group commits a crime, say Americans in general, would you say the other 90% should be treated as guilty or removed as well?

If the answer is no in that case, then the standard being applied is not consistent. If the answer is yes, then we are no longer talking about justice based on individual actions.

 

If one group kills and rapes at a much higher rate than anyone else, especially the natives, like in this case, then the convicted criminals of that group should be sent packing and the border closed to that group going forward.

Rape gangs, 250,000 girls raped/abused
Beheadings in the street
Two tier, suicidal empathy policing

when these things are going on, the country is in danger correct?

You are trying to argue that they don’t commit worse crimes at a higher rate, so why not also remove the Irish and British criminals because it’s all the same. You think this is a “gotcha” and an example of taking some moral high ground. It’s the opposite though. So caught up admiring your moral purity in the mirror that you can’t realize I answered your question in my last response. You aren’t proving anything in your argument other than your naiveté.

Plenty of laws could be established to curb these disgusting people committing crimes in your country. If you are an immigrant and you commit a violent crime, you’re gone. As soon as your sentence is complete, you’re gone. Sexual crime or violent crime you have to go. Of course you don’t deport your own people. Pakistani Muslims, with their 250,000 girl rape ring, should be put on full stop at the border. Not sorry. Don’t care about your virtue signaling.
Maybe you’re like Piers Morgan and don’t understand “per capita”. Maybe you’re one of those.

 

Try a little harder to stay on subject.

India 14% muslim
Pakistan 97% muslim

 

Xenophobia isn't usually the answer. Who is to judge what assimilation is? Texas and the United States never had that kind of assimilation. Schools in parts of Houston were still taught in German well into the 20th century. They didn't teach English at all.

Thinking another nation should have a mandated arbitrary assimilation requirement is only a way for problems and ruin.

 

Lol. Xenophobia? Not at all. It’s survival.

Those German speakers weren’t forming rape gangs either.

They assimilated just fine

 

Not to the existing culture. They had been in the country for generations and were still leaning everything in their mother tongue.

Collective punishment, which is what you're proposing, is nothing but wrong

 

Yeah why do you defend (albeit weakly) the rape gangs?

 

No, I'm taking your own principle, that it's okay to treat the innocent 90% the same as the convicted 10% for safety reasons, and applying it universally. If you can't do that, then safety isn't actually what's driving your position. It's not a gotcha, it's just consistency.

You already answered part of this: you said citizens don't get deported because, well, you don't deport your own people. Fine, but that's a claim about legal status, not about safety. So separate the two. Forget deportation. Just monitoring. If a native-born group had the same elevated crime rate, would you support closely monitoring or separating the innocent 90% of that group too, the same way you'd accept it for the foreign group?

If yes, you're consistent, and I'll grant the safety argument applies evenly. If no, then the variable doing the work was never "this keeps us safer." It was "this group isn't one of mine, so I'll accept costs to their innocent members that I wouldn't accept for my own." That's not a safety policy. That's just a different standard for insiders and outsiders, dressed up as one.