Church on Sunday, White Hood on Monday. Good Ole Bible Belt- http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tm...ashpost/20041128/ts_washpost/a16443_2004nov27 TUSCALOOSA, Ala. -- On that long-ago day of Alabama's great shame, Gov. George C. Wallace (D) stood in a schoolhouse door and declared that his state's constitution forbade black students to enroll at the University of Alabama. He was correct. If Wallace could be brought back to life today to reprise his 1963 moment of infamy outside Foster Auditorium, he would still be correct. Alabama voters made sure of that Nov. 2, refusing to approve a constitutional amendment to erase segregation-era wording requiring separate schools for "white and colored children" and to eliminate references to the poll taxes once imposed to disenfranchise blacks. The vote was so close -- a margin of 1,850 votes out of 1.38 million -- that an automatic recount will take place Monday. But, with few expecting the results to change, the amendment's saga has dragged Alabama into a confrontation with its segregationist past that illuminates the sometimes uneasy race relations of its present. The outcome resonates achingly here in this college town, where the silver-haired men and women who close their eyes and lift their arms when the organ wails at Bethel Baptist Church -- a short drive from Wallace's schoolhouse door -- don't have to strain to remember riding buses past the shiny all-white school on their way to the all-black school. "There are people here who are still fighting the Civil War," said Tommy Woods, 63, a deacon at Bethel and a retired school administrator. "They're holding on to things that are long since past. It's almost like a religion." There are competing theories about the defeat of Amendment 2, the measure that would have taken "colored children" and segregated schools out of Alabama's constitution. One says latent, persistent racism was to blame; another says voters are suspicious of all constitutional amendments; and a third says it was not about race but about taxes. The amendment had two main parts: the removal of the separate-schools language and the removal of a passage -- inserted in the 1950s in an attempt to counter the Brown v. Board of Education ruling against segregated public schools -- that said Alabama's constitution does not guarantee a right to a public education. Leading opponents, such as Alabama Christian Coalition President John Giles, said they did not object to removing the passage about separate schools for "white and colored children." But, employing an argument that was ridiculed by most of the state's newspapers and by legions of legal experts, Giles and others said guaranteeing a right to a public education would have opened a door for "rogue" federal judges to order the state to raise taxes to pay for improvements in its public school system. The argument plays to Alabama's primal fear of federal control, a fear born of years of resentment over U.S. courts' ordering the desegregation of schools and the creation of black-majority legislative districts. "Activists on the bench know no bounds," Giles said. "It's a trial lawyer's dream." Giles was aided by a virtually unparalleled Alabama celebrity in his battle against the amendment, distributing testimonials from former chief justice Roy Moore, whose fame was sealed in 2003 when he defied a federal court order to remove a two-ton granite Ten Commandments monument from the rotunda of the Alabama Supreme Court. They were joined by former Moore aide Tom Parker, who handed out miniature Confederate flags this fall during his successful campaign for a seat on the Alabama Supreme Court. Arguing that the amendment could lead to higher taxes is a potent strategy in Alabama, which is one of the nation's most lightly taxed states and which resoundingly rejected a record $1.2 billion tax increase proposed last year by Gov. Bob Riley (R), a conservative, to pay for school improvements and lessen the tax burden on the poor. But many blacks view the Amendment 2 opponents' tax pitch as a smoke screen. As the vote results sink in, the deacons and the Bible-toting ladies at the Bethel church here have spoken of dark conspiracies, of sinister agendas. They speak from experience. Vertia Killings, 72, was riding on a bus that had to be rerouted because of the commotion at the University of Alabama on the day Wallace -- who eventually renounced his segregationist past -- made his stand. Her father, Benny Mack, paid a $45 poll tax and "ate a little less" because of it, she said. Others chose to eat instead of vote. Killings does not see the amendment's defeat as a matter of mere symbolism, even though Alabama's constitutional ban on integrated schools was trumped -- then and now -- by federal law. She has watched school testing results with growing uneasiness. Black students in Alabama have struggled on some national tests, with 73 percent of black eighth-graders rated below basic competency in math, compared with 32 percent of white eighth-graders. Killings also frets about Alabama schools -- just as schools in many other parts of the country -- steadfastly resegregating. This phenomenon, which is getting increased attention among national education experts, is attributed to a kaleidoscope of factors, including the suburban migration of white families, private school expansion and the rising popularity of home schooling among white conservatives. "It seems like we're having a reversal," Killings said. It matters not at all to Killings and her friends that the amendment's opponents say they want to remove the segregated-schools portion of the constitution but cannot abide by guaranteeing a public education and fear mandates for higher education taxes. The people who are most affected by poorly funded schools are the same people who were affected in another era by poll taxes: poor blacks and poor whites. "I don't know but a few black folks who can afford to send their kids to private school," said Charles Steele Jr., a former Democratic member of the Alabama legislature who lives here and is national vice president of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference. This is not the first time that Steele has tangled with Alabama's constitution, a gigantic document that has more than 740 amendments and more than 310,000 words, making it the world's longest, at nearly 40 times the length of the U.S. Constitution. Four years ago, voters repealed a constitutional amendment banning interracial marriage. The state constitution, which most historians agree was written to protect large landowners and to disenfranchise blacks, is so riddled with antiquated wording that some high school students in Birmingham make an annual trip to the city library for a project known as the search for "the loony laws." Yet the constitution, with its racist past and its racist present, only grows. On Nov. 2, it was amended three times -- numbers 743, 744 and 745. Giles has said he would support taking out the passage about separate schools for "white and colored children" as long as the part about not guaranteeing a right to an education is kept. Ken Guin, the Democratic House majority leader who wrote Amendment 2, is talking about trying again. Next time, he said, he might do it Giles's way.
Isn't it Alabama where Barkley wants to become governor? Good luck with that. It's like the Land That Time And Good Sense Forgot. How sad.
SO the people of Alabama are spending untold amounts of time and money fighting over whether or not to change something in their constitution that has no effect on the way they live their lives. That would be like the people of Massachusets fighting over an amendment banning the burning of witches. People of Alabama, your schools were desegregated decades ago, it doesn't matter what your constitution says, just go to the local high school and check out the intermingling of black and white students. What a tremendous waste of resources.
I understand what you're saying and respectfully disagree. The fact that so many people would vote against something that would seem to be a slam dunk only opens old wounds and forces me to question how much has really changed. I may be friends with a white guy at school but now I wonder....... am I welcomed in his home? Why didn't I get that job? Why was that paper only a B? Why didn't I get that loan? Why was I pulled over? Not saying that racism is the reason, only that it must always be factored as a possibility. A vote like that only strengthened that possibility, at least in my mind.
R you a minority? If not it is easy for you to say If you are. . . .IMO you are delusional if you think it does not matter people died for the right . .. A NATIVE BORN AMERICAN RIGHT for you to dismiss it as useless. . . is disrespectful ALSO Just because it is not being enforced now. . .doesn't mean it cannot be enforced later BEing able to go into a building. . but seeing a sign saying N*GG*S can't come in . . . does not equal you are welcome Rocket River
No surprise that Roy Moore was involved. If it's such a waste of time and money, why did people vote against removing both parts? If it wasn't a big deal, they would have just removed it and it would be over with.
There was this kind of vote, in which the segregationists won. Yet it seems like much of the time when people bring up racial concerns they are looked on as being annoying complainers who are keeping PC talk alive, and how bad everything is because it is all too PC these days. Look at the vote. Racism is alive. Talking about it isn't just meaningless whining from people who can't move on. It certainly has little to do with PC. For the record I can't stand PC. I think it is censorship, and often times prevents learning the truth. But I hate racism more, and talking about it, pointing it out, etc. isn't just a PC thing, or meaningless complaining.
My close friend was in Alabama at graduate school just a few years back when the state legislature voted to amend the state constitution to allow for interracial marriage. it only passed by a few votes! that is unbelievable to me. i've mentioned this before...i didn't grow up understanding or knowing of racism. i knew it existed, but it was foreign to me. my parents always taught me that everyone is worthy of respect..that i'm no better than anyone else, particularly not because of skin color. my theology matched that as well. so i find myself fighting the PC movement sometimes...or at least I have in the past...simply because i don't PERCEIVE the problem. but as i've grown older and talked with more and more people who are victims of racism, even still today, the more i've realized how my ignorance was largely in control of those previous opinions. i'm thankful i didn't see it firsthand and wasn't taught it by my parents....but i'm also thankful that i've met others who see it in reality from day to day. it sucks.
I believe that one can fight against PC and against Racism. PC isn't the solution to racism. I hate PC as much as anyone. That's part of the reason I have a problem with people calling speaking out on racism, just conforming with PC. To me PC is changing things, changing history, censoring literature, art, and diverting from the real problem.
i hear ya....i agree with you. i guess PC is a term that has to be defined for every conversation its used in.