1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Dorian Finney Smith Contract Details

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by #TheBeard, Jul 7, 2025 at 12:39 PM.

  1. RocketsFido

    RocketsFido Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2013
    Messages:
    10,490
    Likes Received:
    12,745
    I think 3rd and 4th year being non-guaranteed is a good sign. He is a bit older as a role player and I have seen Lakers fans say that his movement laterally has clearly declined. He used to be able to guard 1 to 5 pretty well, now he's struggling a bit more staying in front of guards. Nonetheless, I think his workload will be less on the Rockets and he's the type of player that prides himself on being the glue guy.
     
  2. Aware

    Aware Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2014
    Messages:
    2,775
    Likes Received:
    3,671
    Rafael Stone.
     
    roslolian and matchesmalone like this.
  3. today

    today Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 1999
    Messages:
    2,226
    Likes Received:
    1,210
    Initially I was not pleased about a 4 year deal, but now I'm pumped... great 2 yr deal, with flexibility in yr 3 and 4 to waive him or turn the contract into a trade filler contract and guarantee the exact amount we need to complete the trade. Stone. Cold. Stunner.

    Looking forward to seeing the FVV and Capela details.
     
    Arnel likes this.
  4. DaDakota

    DaDakota Balance wins
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 1999
    Messages:
    129,342
    Likes Received:
    39,898
    Stone has been amazing on contracts.

    DD
     
    fattz likes this.
  5. duluth111222

    duluth111222 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2006
    Messages:
    3,968
    Likes Received:
    4,234
    The PO on the 4th year is kind of weird coz his 3rd year is also non guaranteed. You’d think he’d want a PO on the 3rd year instead
     
    Arnel likes this.
  6. Marsarinian

    Marsarinian Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2006
    Messages:
    2,098
    Likes Received:
    325
    It's hard to criticize this contract given the amount of flexibility it gives us, especially as a potential trade piece down the line. Excellent work by Stone & co.
     
  7. peleincubus

    peleincubus Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2002
    Messages:
    26,771
    Likes Received:
    15,092
    I don't understand how that works. How do you have a player option but it's not guaranteed?
     
    duluth111222 likes this.
  8. duluth111222

    duluth111222 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2006
    Messages:
    3,968
    Likes Received:
    4,234
    I’m guessing he can still opt out even after the non guaranteed salary becomes guaranteed? But then again it only works if the PO is on the 3rd year. Otherwise if he’s cut on year 3, the PO becomes useless
     
  9. A_3PO

    A_3PO Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2006
    Messages:
    46,787
    Likes Received:
    12,378
    The way I read it:

    Year 3: The Rockets have a team option. They can cut him loose if they want.

    Year 4: Both the Rockets and DFS have an option. IIRC, whenever both the player and team have an option, it is highly unlikely both sides exercise.
     
    Arnel, OremLK and leebigez like this.
  10. duluth111222

    duluth111222 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2006
    Messages:
    3,968
    Likes Received:
    4,234
    Interesting. If Rox decide to cut him on year 4, he still can exercise his option to stay on the team, right?
     
  11. sealclubber1016

    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    21,467
    Likes Received:
    34,785
    No

    Mutual options are about getting him more money if he is overperforming the contract and wants to opt out even if the Rockets want to keep him. If he's not playing well enough for the Rockets to exercise then he has no say.
     
    Easy and Arnel like this.
  12. duluth111222

    duluth111222 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2006
    Messages:
    3,968
    Likes Received:
    4,234
    I’m more confused now lol. How can he get more money if it’s non guaranteed to begin with?

    Edit: see your edit. That makes more sense. Thanks!
     
  13. sealclubber1016

    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    21,467
    Likes Received:
    34,785
    If he's coming off an amazing 3rd season and the Rockets want to keep him, he can just opt out and go get more money.

    If he's a scrub after year 3 and wants that last season, the Rockets can just reject it.
     
    duluth111222 and A_3PO like this.
  14. Forza Juve

    Forza Juve Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2023
    Messages:
    8
    Likes Received:
    18
    This. We can only hope the ankle surgery solve his lingering injuries and Pelinka being dumb.
     
  15. roslolian

    roslolian Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    30,084
    Likes Received:
    20,285
    If Ausar is good he will cost more than 12M. If he is not good then we shouldnt bother.
     
    Arnel likes this.
  16. HI Mana

    HI Mana Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2006
    Messages:
    1,428
    Likes Received:
    1,084
    My reading of the CBA is that any option year (player or team) needs to have more salary guaranteed than the previous year (I believe this is what Nate Duncan keyed in on when he mentioned that the 3rd year needed to be non-guaranteed as well when the 3+1 structure was originally reported).

    So a contract structure that makes sense to why they would put in a year 4 "mutual option" would be similar to what the Rockets did with KPJ; if they want DFS for 2027-2028, they need to guarantee both Y3 and Y4 on some trigger date; this would then allow DFS to have a true player option that matters in 2028-2029. I think this is pretty nice for both sides; it protects the Rockets in case DFS can't recover from his ankle and knee injuries, but it also lets him time the market if he proves he is recovered and aging gracefully into his mid-30s.

    If this is the actual structure, it will essentially be FVV's Rockets tenure all wrapped into a single contract: guaranteed two year salary with either an out after year 2, or a new 1+1 PO.
     
    Easy, Marsarinian and duluth111222 like this.
  17. roslolian

    roslolian Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    30,084
    Likes Received:
    20,285
    This contract is an S+ when you consider it expires the same time as FVV. Rox will be able to clear massive capspace in 2 yrs.
     
  18. OremLK

    OremLK Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2010
    Messages:
    20,218
    Likes Received:
    17,985
    It's an odd contract structure, but if this is the case it seems pretty favorable for the Rockets.
     
  19. roslolian

    roslolian Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    30,084
    Likes Received:
    20,285
    DFS is basically a clone of Dillon Brook with a cheaper contract with better terms. Its ok if he cant stay in front of quicker guards the rest of the crew can chase small guards (FVV, Reed, Amen, Tari).
     
  20. meh

    meh Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2002
    Messages:
    16,197
    Likes Received:
    3,409
    The original terms felt like an overpay, but is overall fine if you just want to win now and pay later. Later with the 4th year turning out to be a nothing-burger felt like a fair deal, but still 3 years seemed a little steep. 2 years guaranteed is the true "fair" deal given his age and role. I wouldn't call it team-friendly, since if you look at this off-season signings, a lot of similarly thought of role players took even less money. But it's definitely a good structure for the Rockets to not be hamstrung by year 3. As that's the year Amen will be making $50-60mil/yr.
     

Share This Page