I embrace it, which is why I am asking you to divulge how you reached your seemingly mutually exclusive conclusions on this issue. Tell me what is the science behind your stated position that: 1) the earth is cooling; 2) the earth is warming but not because of CO2; and 3) Solar flares are causing the earth to warm How did you arrive at these observations?
Are you saying that the theory of anthropogenic global warming wasn't developed based on the scientific method? Can you or any of the skeptics elaborate on how it wasn't?
And did you read the whole article? Nothing in it states that the theory wasn't developed according to the scientific method. The interviewer asks questions in that regard but the Dr. Jones never says that the scientific method wasn't used.
I read that interview which you obtained from this posting on free republic - http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2453081/posts - what part of it shows you definitively that the entirety of GW is a fraud and that Denialists such as yourself are correct? Tell me what is the science behind your stated position that: 1) the earth is cooling; 2) the earth is warming but not because of CO2; and 3) Solar flares are causing the earth to warm How did you arrive at these observations?
Hey has anyone read these books by Bjorn Lomborg where he refutes climate change predictions as bogus?
oldie but a goodie There Is No Scientific Method https://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/04/...e_code=1.J08.I_aT.1475lQA6AJi8&smid=url-share
I read that and I don't think he quite understand the purpose of the scientific method. It's not a method of thinking or making discoveries - it's a method of testing and verifying the strength of thinking. It's not a way to think, it's a way to test thinking.
Greenland checking in. We continue to do a bang-up job of melting ice. It's one of the few things we humans are consistently good at.
