Big if true. The person closest to saying that Elon stole the election is saying ... Methinks that you (@Space Ghost) are not a careful reader and perhaps just **** posting. Again, you be you.
Yes, but it requires a hand recount - which should be fine.......actually, hand counts should be done anyway and compared - we can't rely on technology.... There is very little voter fraud as far as people voting many times but hacking could be a problem....need to recount and see..... DD
I wouldn't be surprised if there is still election fraud. It's been going on as long as we've been a country. Classic cases include the LBJ senate election; the political machines in the Northeast such as Tammany Hall; and every election in the history of Chicago However if it did happened, it didn't happen like this article states. At this point we know the elections are going to come down to several thousand votes in a few states. So I wouldn't be surprised if someone figured out how to illegally game the system. No need for some weird space laser conspiracy.
My gut tells me this. It seems like this is entirely plausible given the resources (unlimited) and weird inconsistencies. But if they could pull this off, do you think the powers that be will ever let this reach any sort of conclusion? With the small amount of people (read: money) that give a **** currently, I don't think so. Opposing people are at the b**** and complain stage, not the shut up and do something stage. I think the American public needs to get ****ed so many times, so hard and so long, that they get fed up with it and there is a change reaction.
I read somewhere that it was statistically improbable for Trump to win all 7 swing states and it had something to do with Bullet ballots being miscounted, or a much higher percentage in swing states....let me see if I can find that. https://www.planetcritical.com/p/cyber-security-experts-warn-election-hacked Nothing wrong with a recount, and one is going on - if nothing is found, no big deal, same for all those recounts we did in 2020. DD
It's odd that Democrats would break from Harris to vote Trump. But comparing their race to the AG's in NC is not the best comparison. Jeff Jackson was a popular congressman before running for AG and ran a great campaign against an unpopular Republican. I would like to see how Trump and Kamala fared in other races, and how Trump's numbers compared to 2020, etc. Also, I still can't believe he won, and god knows if anyone were to ever try it would be him, but "It Will Hold" posting a big ass screengrab from ProPublica at the top of their article is not the best look.
You boys running down that rabbit hole like MAGA did in 2020. It was harder to find a hard core Harris supporter in 2025 than a hard core 2021 Trump supporter … by a wide margin. And ya think the election was rigged.
What would be the downside to him of doing it? The effort to prove something like that would seem near impossible and beyond the capabilities of any particular state to pull off. No matter who ended up winning the election, nothing federal would be pursued, but for different reasons in each case.
Just about all ballots are paper, even if the ballot box is a touchscreen. It will print out a paper ballot that you put in an envelope and stick in a box. This is because democrats were upset about voting and tabulating machines owned by Republicans aligned corporations that had no paper trail. If something is suspicious. or the result is close, the ballots can be hand counted. There were a lot of changes in the last 20 years or so to make elections more secure. You had an independent federal agency, Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, doing good work on election security. Of course Trumps budget is going to gut this agency.
So this is very suspicious. It seems Trump has already gutted election security. This was one of those things that went under the radar due to the firehouse of ****. In February 2025, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) implemented significant changes to its election security efforts under the Trump administration. Key actions and developments in February 2025: Freeze on election security activities: CISA strategically paused all election security activities pending an internal review, as confirmed by a memo obtained by NBC News and reported by Wired. A DHS spokesperson confirmed this action. Termination of employees: CISA acting director Bridget Bean fired approximately 130 employees, including election security advisers, in early February. These were experts in election administration who helped state and local officials obtain resources and support. The agency hasn't publicly released the outcome of the internal review, which was completed in March. End of funding for EI-ISAC: The Trump administration stopped funding the Election Infrastructure Information Sharing and Analysis Center (EI-ISAC), which previously alerted state officials of election threats, stating it "no longer supports Department priorities". Concerns from election officials: State election officials expressed grave concerns about the impact of these cuts on election security infrastructure and the loss of federal support, especially for smaller counties with limited resources. They worried about the ability to secure elections against potential threats and the potential loss of intelligence about foreign interference. The FBI's Foreign Influence Task Force was also disbanded in February by Attorney General Pam Bondi.
