https://substack.com/inbox/post/165...h5XAeLMp_HkU6XqOgA_aem_FJvK3BJwfbR4xydYpJFkNw That article seems to say, yes. It is in court in NY - where they are going to do a hand recount - if this is proven true, biggest traitorous act in US history. DD
She Won. They Didn't Just Change the Machines. They Rewired the Election. How Leonard Leo's 2021 sale of an electronics firm enabled tech giants to subvert the 2024 election. This Will Hold Jun 11, 2025 This Substack is reader-supported. For fearless reporting and expert-backed research, please consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. The Dark Enlightenment Coup The missing votes uncovered in Smart Elections’ legal case in Rockland County, New York, are just the tip of the iceberg—an iceberg that extends across the swing states and into Texas. On Monday, an investigator’s story finally hit the news cycle: Pro V&V, one of only two federally accredited testing labs, approved sweeping last-minute updates to ES&S voting machines in the months leading up to the 2024 election—without independent testing, public disclosure, or full certification review. These changes were labeled “de minimis”—a term meant for trivial tweaks. But they touched ballot scanners, altered reporting software, and modified audit files—yet were all rubber-stamped with no oversight. That revelation is a shock to the public. But for those who’ve been digging into the bizarre election data since November, this isn’t the headline—it’s the final piece to the puzzle. While Pro V&V was quietly updating equipment in plain sight, a parallel operation was unfolding behind the curtain—between tech giants and Donald Trump. And it started with a long forgotten sale. A Power Cord Becomes a Backdoor In March 2021, Leonard Leo—the judicial kingmaker behind the modern conservative legal machine—sold a quiet Chicago company by the name of Tripp Lite for $1.65 billion. The buyer: Eaton Corporation, a global power infrastructure conglomerate that just happened to have a partnership with Peter Thiel’s Palantir. To most, Tripp Lite was just a hardware brand—battery backups, surge protectors, power strips. But in America’s elections, Tripp Lite devices were something else entirely. They are physically connected to ES&S central tabulators and Electionware servers, and Dominion tabulators and central servers across the country. And they aren’t dumb devices. They are smart UPS units—programmable, updatable, and capable of communicating directly with the election system via USB, serial port, or Ethernet. ES&S systems, including central tabulators and Electionware servers, rely on Tripp Lite UPS devices. ES&S’s Electionware suite runs on Windows OS, which automatically trusts connected UPS hardware. If Eaton pushed an update to those UPS units, it could have gained root-level access to the host tabulation environment—without ever modifying certified election software. In Dominion’s Democracy Suite 5.17, the drivers for these UPS units are listed as “optional”—meaning they can be updated remotely without triggering certification requirements or oversight. Optional means unregulated. Unregulated means invisible. And invisible means perfect for infiltration. A New Purpose for the Partnership After the Tripp Lite acquisition, Eaton stayed under the radar. But in May 2024, it resurfaced with an announcement that escaped most headlines: Eaton was deepening its partnership with Palantir Technologies. Let’s be clear, Palantir wasn’t brought in for customer service. It was brought in to do what it does best: manage, shape, and secure vast streams of data—quietly. According to Eaton’s own release, Palantir’s role would include: - AI-driven oversight of connected infrastructure - Automated analysis of large datasets - And—most critically—“secure erasure of digital footprints” The Digital Janitor: also known as forensic sanitization, it was now being embedded into Eaton-managed hardware connected directly to voting systems. Palantir didn’t change the votes. It helped ensure you’d never prove it if someone else did.
BallotProof: The Front-End for Scrubbing Democracy Enter the ballot scrubbing platform BallotProof. Co-created by Ethan Shaotran, a longtime employee of Elon Musk and current DOGE employee, BallotProof was pitched as a transparency solution—an app to “verify” scanned ballot images and support election integrity. With Palantir's AI controlling the backend, and BallotProof cleaning the front, only one thing was missing: the signal to go live. September 2024: Eaton and Musk Make It Official Then came the final public breadcrumb: In September 2024, Eaton formally partnered with Elon Musk. The stated purpose? A vague, forward-looking collaboration focused on “grid resilience” and “next-generation communications.” But buried in the partnership documents was this line: “Exploring integration with Starlink's emerging low-orbit DTC infrastructure for secure operational continuity.” The Activation: Starlink Goes Direct-to-Cell That signal came on October 30, 2024—just days before the election, Musk activated 265 brand new low Earth orbit (LEO) V2 Mini satellites, each equipped with Direct-to-Cell (DTC) technology capable of processing, routing, and manipulating real-time data, including voting data, through his satellite network. DTC doesn’t require routers, towers, or a traditional SIM. It connects directly from satellite to any compatible device—including embedded modems in “air-gapped” voting systems, smart UPS units, or unsecured auxiliary hardware. From that moment on: - Commands could be sent from orbit - Patch delivery became invisible to domestic monitors - Compromised devices could be triggered remotely This groundbreaking project that should have taken two-plus years to build, was completed in just under ten months. Elon Musk boasts endlessly about everything he’s launching, building, buying—or even just thinking about—whether it’s real or not. But he pulls off one of the largest and fastest technological feats in modern day history… and says nothing? One might think that was kind of… “weird.” Lasers From Space According to New York Times reporting, on October 5—just before Starlink’s DTC activation—Musk texted a confidant: “I’m feeling more optimistic after tonight. Tomorrow we unleash the anomaly in the matrix.” Then, an hour later: “This isn’t something on the chessboard, so they’ll be quite surprised. ‘Lasers’ from space.” It read like a riddle. In hindsight, it was a blueprint. Let’s review what was in place: This wasn’t a theory. It was a full-scale operation. A systemic digital occupation—clean, credentialed, and remote-controlled.
The Outcome Data that makes no statistical sense. A clean sweep in all seven swing states. The fall of the Blue Wall. Eighty-eight counties flipped red—not one flipped blue. Every victory landed just under the threshold that would trigger an automatic recount. Donald Trump outperformed expectations in down-ballot races with margins never before seen—while Kamala Harris simultaneously underperformed in those exact same areas. If one were to accept these results at face value—Donald Trump, a 34-count convicted felon, supposedly outperformed Ronald Reagan. According to the co-founder of the Election Truth Alliance: “These anomalies didn’t happen nationwide. They didn’t even happen across all voting methods—this just doesn’t reflect human voting behavior.” They were concentrated. Targeted. Specific to swing states and Texas—and specific to Election Day voting. And the supposed explanation? “Her policies were unpopular.” Let’s think this through logically. We’re supposed to believe that in all the battleground states, Democratic voters were so disillusioned by Vice President Harris’s platform that they voted blue down ballot—but flipped to Trump at the top of the ticket? Not in early voting. Not by mail. With exception to Nevada, only on Election Day. And only after a certain threshold of ballots had been cast—where VP Harris’s numbers begin to diverge from her own party, and Trump’s suddenly begin to surge. As President Biden would say, “C’mon, man.” In the world of election data analysis, there’s a term for that: vote-flipping algorithm. Billionaires and Tech Giants Pulled Off the Crime of the Century Why? There wasn’t just one reason—there were many. Elon Musk himself hinted at the stakes: he faced the real possibility of a prison sentence if Trump lost. He launched his bid for Twitter—at $20 billion over market value—just 49 days after Putin invaded Ukraine. That alone should have raised every red flag. But when the ROI is $15 trillion in mineral rights tied to Ukraine losing the war and geopolitical deals Trump could green light, it wasn’t a loss—it was leverage. It’s no secret Musk was in communication with Putin for over two years. He even granted Starlink access to Russian forces. That’s not just profiteering. That’s treason. Then there’s Peter Thiel and the so-called “broligarchs”—tech billionaires who worship at the altar of shower-avoidant blogger Curtis Yarvin. They casually joke about “humane genocide for non-producers” and have long viewed democracy as a nuisance—an obstacle to their vision of hypercapitalism and themselves as the permanent ruling elite. Well, what is the elimination of Medicaid if not “humane genocide”—and does anyone really wonder why his 40-year-old protégé and political rookie, JD Vance, is Vice President? With this technology in place, if the third-term legislation were to pass, it would hand Vance a minimum of twelve years at the helm of Thiel’s regime. And of course, Donald Trump himself: He spent a year telling his followers he didn’t need their votes—at one point stating, “...in four years, you don't have to vote again. We'll have it fixed so good, you're not gonna have to vote.” Trump was facing eighty-eight felony indictments—he was desperate to avoid conviction and locked in a decades-long alliance with Vladimir Putin. An alliance that’s now impossible to ignore—look no further than his policy trail. He froze aid to Ukraine and has threatened to place sanctions on them, while planning to lift sanctions off Russia. He openly campaigned for anti-EU candidates, and sided with Russia in multiple key United Nations votes related to the Ukraine conflict. Let’s be clear: Donald Trump pledges allegiance to a red, white, and blue flag— It’s just not the American one. What Happens Now? We don’t need permission to enforce the Constitution. We need courage. While state attorneys general begin their investigations, it only takes one U.S. senator to initiate the disqualification proceedings against the unelected and unfit occupant of the Oval Office. State Attorneys General and Investigators: - Conduct independent audits of UPS firmware on Dominion and ES&S machines - Subpoena communications between Eaton, Palantir, Starlink employees, and Pro V&V - Audit Starlink satellite logs for the week of the election - Freeze uncertified infrastructure updates - Recount physical ballots—by hand Now they’re rolling out the same technological toolkit abroad—forcing countries into Starlink contracts in exchange for tariff relief. The U.S. election wasn’t their endgame. It was their litmus test. Want the truth they’re not telling you? For fearless reporting and expert-backed research, read The Common Coalition Report. And if you believe in funding real, independent work—support our all volunteer team here.
That is full article - don't know if true, but it is being challenged in court, and a hand recount will take place.....interesting times we live in. We should all be voting on our phone using 2FA anyway. DD
U sound like dem conservatives crying when trump lost. If we spent the previous years declaring our elections to b secured and fair, cant just be going full blown conspiracy whenever a side u root for lose.
I don’t think there’s credible evidence the election was rigged. If Elon could do that, he would’ve rigged that Wisconsin Supreme Court race as well. Biden’s CISA even said the election was secure.
Just interesting, and glad it is being investigated, Trump is a known criminal, so wouldn’t be surprised. Journalists always ferret out truth. DD
Don't entertain his stupidity. Its just as dumb when people would say Trump was the winner in 2020. 2020 Trump support was abysmal and 2024 Harris was even lower.
Probably true, can't hurt them to investigate it then, right? Only fair after 61+ frivolous lawsuits by Trump. Nothing to fear by investigating and getting truth, no matter what it is. DD
If 70% of today's Democrats are convinced, based on weak, loosely connected arguments and deeply flawed reasoning like the one shown in this blog, that the 2024 election was stolen, we would truly be doomed. We're here today because that's exactly what happened in 2020, when 70% of Republicans bought into the Big Lie so deeply that now they are not just divorced from reality, they want to stay that way. Fear the mindless cult. Stay grounded.
The statistics are weird. And the article starts off strong and then goes into lala land. It's clear this person knows nothing about tech. You're a tech guy, you must have shut off your brain to even consider this. So Starlink has direct to cell now and these UPS's are connected to ballot counting software and ... magically hacked the computers. They are missing the critical part where all these UPS's must have ****ing cell phone receivers in them to get the updates. And if they all have cell phone receivers then Starlink isn't even necessary. This is just flat out dumb. And let's throw in Thiel, Palantr, Leo Leonard and the Federalist society just so all the lefts favorite villains are involved. This is fan fiction. Now the obvious hack, if you are going this route. Find a vulnerability between UPS and tally computer. Update all the UPS firmware with the malware. UPS hacks tally computer. done.
I highly doubt it's anything substantial, most likely human error or general anomalies that occur and won't make a difference either way. Judge in 2024 Election Results Lawsuit Sets Timeline A lawsuit questioning the accuracy of the 2024 election will go to trial early next year, a judge has said. SMART Legislation, the action arm of the nonpartisan watchdog group SMART Elections, brought the lawsuit over voting discrepancies in Rockland County, New York. Why It Matters The lawsuit has brought the results of the 2024 election under scrutiny. However, as Congress has certified the results declaring President Donald Trump the winner, it won't change the outcome. Election integrity has become a concern for many Americans following Trump's unsupported claims of widespread voter fraud in the 2020 election. What To Know Last month, Judge Rachel Tanguay of the New York Supreme Court ruled that the allegations in the lawsuit were serious enough for discovery to proceed. In an order filed on Wednesday, Tanguay said all discovery—where the involved parties exchange information and evidence relevant to the case—must be completed within 210 days, about seven months. The order also said the plaintiffs "shall file Note of Issue and Trial Readiness Order" no later than eight months from now "unless otherwise directed by the court." According to the complaint, more voters have sworn in legal affidavits that they voted for independent U.S. Senate candidate Diane Sare than the Rockland County Board of Elections counted and certified, contradicting those results. The complaint said at least nine votes must have been cast for Sare in District 39, with seven voters signing sworn statements saying they voted for her on Election Day, but the Rockland County Board of Elections recorded five votes. The complaint also cited numerous statistical anomalies in the presidential election results. They include multiple districts where hundreds of voters chose the Democratic candidate Kirsten Gillibrand for Senate, but none voted for then-Vice President Kamala Harris, the Democratic candidate for president. The complaint said that in Rockland County, 9 percent of voters who voted for Gillibrand did not vote Harris, giving Harris a -9 percent drop-off rate. "The difference in the drop-off rate between the Republican Presidential candidate and the Democratic Presidential candidate is in excess of 30 percent," the complaint said. "A study conducted by researchers at Yale, Harvard, MIT and Columbia Universities found that split-ticket voting averaged between 1-2 percent in the 2020 election. Therefore, split-ticket voting seems a very unlikely explanation of the Rockland BOE data." What People Are Saying Lulu Friesdat, the founder and executive director of SMART Legislation, said in a statement: "There is clear evidence that the Senate results are incorrect, and there are statistical indications that the presidential results are highly unlikely. "If the results are incorrect, it is a violation of the constitutional rights of each person who voted in the 2024 Rockland County general election. The best way to determine if the results are correct is to examine the paper ballots in a full public, transparent hand recount of all presidential and Senate ballots in Rockland County. We believe it's vitally important, especially in the current environment, to be absolutely confident about the results of the election." Max Bonamente, a professor of physics and astronomy at the University of Alabama in Huntsville and the author of Statistics and Analysis of Scientific Data, said in a paper on the voting data from Rockland County: "These data would require extreme sociological or political causes for their explanation, and would benefit from further assurances as to their fidelity." Costas Panagopoulos, a professor of political science at Northeastern University, previously told Newsweek: "Statistical irregularities in elections should always be investigated, but the sources of such inconsistencies, which can include error or miscalculation, are not always nefarious. Still, scrutinizing election results can strengthen confidence in elections. Mistakes can happen. "In this case, the drop-off inconsistencies could reflect the idiosyncratic nature of the 2024 presidential election cycle. Alone, statistical comparisons to previous cycles cannot provide definitive proof of wrongdoing. "In any case, it does not appear that any of these inconsistencies would be sufficient to change the outcomes of any of the elections in question in New York state. That does not mean they should not be scrutinized, and any errors, if verified, should be corrected for the historical record. But there is not necessarily any need to invalidate any of these elections in these jurisdictions." What Happens Next The lawsuit is seeking a full hand recount of ballots cast in the presidential and U.S. Senate races in Rockland County. A hearing has been scheduled for September 22. https://www.newsweek.com/judge-2024-election-lawsuit-timeline-2084468
No, but Trump' 2.0 s biggest donor did influence lots suburb women to not vote for Kamala. in the 2020 election against Trump, Biden had enjoyed a sizeable margin of victory among registered women voters, in particular suburbanites. for the 2024 election, Trump actually won this demographic, one that he had lost in 2016 and 2020. this voting shift can be attributed to Musk's money. Musk Financed Pro-Trump Group That Invoked Ruth Bader Ginsburg Billionaire Elon Musk financed a pro-Donald Trump super PAC that---thru sleight-of-hands---compared the president-elect's abortion views to those of late Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. In the final weeks leading up to the November 5 election, RBG PAC aired a television ad highlighting Trump's remarks that he would not endorse a nationwide abortion ban. The ad emphasized Trump's position, with a narrator stating he "does support reasonable exceptions for rape, incest and the life of the mother." According to federal campaign finance filings released on 6 Dec 2024, RBG PAC, a political action committee established in mid-October 2024 , received a $20.5 million donation just a week later after forming from an entity named the "Elon Musk Revocable Trust," The rapid timeline between the contribution and th 6 Dec 2024 disclosure deadline kept Musk's connection to the group—which he had not publicly discussed—hidden until the filings were made public.
I have no clue, honestly - but am ok with a hand recount there are a lot of statistical anomalies - best to find out. And, I don't doubt for a second that the GOP would cheat if they could, they break the law every chance they get. DD