1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

79Trillion wealth transfer from lower 90% to top 1% explains MAGA

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by glynch, Jun 12, 2025 at 1:20 PM.

  1. glynch

    glynch Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2000
    Messages:
    18,049
    Likes Received:
    3,576
    https://www.nationofchange.org/2025...edistributed-from-the-bottom-90-to-the-top-1/

    an excerpt: from RAND, definitely not a left wing outfit

    The RAND study paints a grim picture of wage stagnation for most Americans while the top 1% has seen exponential income growth. According to the report:

    • Since 1975, the bottom 90 percent of earners have lost a total of $79 trillion in cumulative earnings due to income inequality.

    • In 2023 alone, $3.9 trillion in wealth was redistributed from workers to the richest Americans.

    • If wages had kept pace with pre-1975 trends, the average full-time worker in the bottom 90 percent would have earned an additional $32,000 last year.

    • Median household income today would be double its current level if inequality had remained at 1975 levels.
     
    HP3 likes this.
  2. lionaire

    lionaire Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2010
    Messages:
    5,854
    Likes Received:
    7,710
  3. StupidMoniker

    StupidMoniker I lost a bet

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2001
    Messages:
    16,116
    Likes Received:
    2,811
    Very misleading phrasing. The wealthy have seen more earnings growth than the poor. No money was actually transferred from the poor to the wealthy, outside of the poor buying stuff the wealthy were selling them. Me buying a big mac isn't a wealth transfer from me to McDonalds.
     
  4. DaDakota

    DaDakota Balance wins
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 1999
    Messages:
    128,519
    Likes Received:
    38,749
    BULLSHIT, you cut their taxes and you take away benefits, it is a pure transfer of wealth.

    When corporations and their owners pay less % wise than migrant workers there is a problem.

    Stop sucking the billionaires knobs....

    DD
     
    Rocket River and HP3 like this.
  5. StupidMoniker

    StupidMoniker I lost a bet

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2001
    Messages:
    16,116
    Likes Received:
    2,811
    Cutting taxes is the opposite of transferring wealth. That is the purpose of taxation, to take wealth from people and spend it as the government sees fit, often by giving it to other people. A criminal who stops robbing you is not transferring wealth to you.
    Corporations and their owners pay much more % wise than migrant workers.
    Facts are not fellatio.
     
  6. Jugdish

    Jugdish Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2006
    Messages:
    9,066
    Likes Received:
    9,567
    We are sooo cooked.
     
    lionaire and Andre0087 like this.
  7. DaDakota

    DaDakota Balance wins
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 1999
    Messages:
    128,519
    Likes Received:
    38,749
    When you stop playing word games and give two ***** about anyone other than yourself, we might listen, but you don't you are a cuckold man for the billionaires....

    DD
     
  8. mtbrays

    mtbrays Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2007
    Messages:
    8,598
    Likes Received:
    7,980
    You're actually running a trade deficit with McDonald's at this point. Sad!
     
    StupidMoniker and Buck Turgidson like this.
  9. glynch

    glynch Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2000
    Messages:
    18,049
    Likes Received:
    3,576
    Good try.
     

Share This Page