[CyberSecurity] Trump Team Accidentally Includes Magazine Editor in War Plans Chat

this dumb fck never knows anything

Just how little does he care about the troops?

 

"Nor anything that was said in the chat" lol yes leaking details about a future attack and giving the enemy a 2 hour heads up is totally fine. Naming CIA operatives by name who were working under cover is completely fine now according to the boomer MAGA

Right wingers have lost whatever few brains cells they had left.

 

This is why the forest is burning. These guys don’t believe in anything except themselves. They think they are smart and know what they are doing. They see process, protocols, etc., as outdated obstacles in their way, so they throw them all away.

The problem is, they aren’t smart. They don’t understand security. They don’t have a good replacement. They act rashly and irresponsibly. The burning forest here is this attitude - the non-experts who think they know more than experts and act on it.

I’ll say this, though - since these guys move fast, eventually, they get it right. But the cost might be... the forest has already burned down.

 

Goldberg is pathological

 

Mike Walz ADDED him to the chat. You are an idiot if you listen to this and want to use it as an excuse to play clean up on behalf of the Trump regime.

There’s nothing for Elon to investigate. Walz manually added the journalist to the text chain for some reason or because he’s an idiot who got his Jeff’s confused. End of story. These guys are incompetent clowns who put our military at danger with their incompetence.

Why can’t you just admit that yourself instead of feeling the need to be an activist/apologist?? Have some fcking self respect for fcks sake.

 

The Hegseth attack/war/whatever plans were pretty fcking detailed. So much so that if Iran had seen that text or Goldberg leaked out when he got this these details those F18 pilots would be shot out of the sky and the target would have fleed the building he was in because it would have been obvious to the Houthis who this target was.

The fact you guys are trying to play cleanup on this sh$tshow just shows how deep in the cult you are. It’s a pathetic new low of lack of self respect.

 

Ain't no point of talking to these guys anymore.

I'm at the point where I just say "you know what? You right. Have fun"

 

Because these peoples entire existence and identity is tied to their political party. So any criticism of that party is a personal attack. That's why they defend it till death, no matter how wrong they are.

"me so scared" is a slip up of that.

 

LOL.
We are supposed to feel relieved Elon is on it.

@basso how long does it take you to take off the clown makeup every night?
Must be exhausting no?

 

Never used for national security issues.

Using signal to group chat about housing policy is a lot different than military targets. I hope you realize that

 

Ooohhh he does. But Obama wore a tan suit. So none of this matters.

 

from the Chief national security correspondent at the Pentagon for Fox News



There is a debate about whether the operational details Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth shared in the Signal Group Chat were "classified" or not. So I surveyed a range of current and former US defense officials who agreed "war plans" is not the right term but what was shared may have been FAR MORE sensitive given the operational details and time stamps ahead of the operation, which could have placed US military pilots in harms way.

What Hegseth shared two hours ahead of the strikes were time sensitive “attack orders” or “operational plans” with actual timing of the strikes and mention of F18s, MQ9 Reapers and Tomahawks. This information is typically sent through classified channels to the commanders in the field as “secret, no forn” message. In other words the information is "classified" and should not be shared through insecure channels.

“Attack orders” or “attack sequence” puts the joint force directly and immediately at risk, according to former senior defense official #1. “It allows the enemy to move the target and increase lethal actions against US forces.”

This kind of real time operational information is more sensitive than “war plans,” which makes this lapse more egregious, according to two former senior US defense officials.

“This information was clearly classified,” according to former senior defense official #1.

The Defense Secretary can retroactively declassify information after the fact, but the fact that this was shared in real time before the strike took place makes it unlikely to have been declassified when it was being shared and seen by the journalist for The Atlantic who was inadvertently included in the Signal chat.

According to a second former senior US defense official, when Hegseth says he didn’t release “war plans” that is pure semantics. These were “attack plans.” “If you are revealing who is going to be attacked (Houthis – the name of the text chain), it still gives the enemy warning. When you release the time of the attack – all of that is always ‘classified’.”

 

When Dave is more right than the clowns on this forum.
lol.

This is why I can't take any Trump supporters seriously. They refuse to admit wrong. Ever.

 

The one bite pizza guy has known political positions? lol

 

That this even has to be explained...

Common sense is dead.








It’s not dead - only voluntarily suppressed by some folks here, especially one who keeps ranting about "your team," clearly showing that they were always projecting.