1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

[Pain] HUGE, self-inflicted Recession incoming due to Trump/Musk

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by SamFisher, Feb 18, 2025.

  1. Buck Turgidson

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2002
    Messages:
    100,160
    Likes Received:
    102,127
    "Profiles in Courage Cartilege"
     
    Nook likes this.
  2. Buck Turgidson

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2002
    Messages:
    100,160
    Likes Received:
    102,127
    You're not wrong, but I'd maybe point out that a "white moderate" in 1963 is just a tad bit different than a "white moderate" in 2025.
     
    Nook and astros123 like this.
  3. SamFisher

    SamFisher Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2003
    Messages:
    61,728
    Likes Received:
    41,148
    Another lesson from this is that our so called leaders in the business sector - are not just giant cowards but openly unintelligent and not very bright

    [​IMG]

    Let's elect a mad King and we'll get lowered taxes. Oh wait he's destroying everything because he's mad. **** you.
     
  4. SamFisher

    SamFisher Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2003
    Messages:
    61,728
    Likes Received:
    41,148
    It's too late now but this analysis presupposes a world where the government is not already being illegally dismantled brick by brick and where the old rules still apply

    The Democrats don't have a lot of tools but they owe it to us to fight. Even if they lose

    The fact that a few of them didn't feel like it or thought it was some kind of strategy game id infuriating. -theres a reason why every D in the house is absolutely furious with Schumer now
     
    ROCKSS, JeffB and astros123 like this.
  5. Amiga

    Amiga Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2008
    Messages:
    25,032
    Likes Received:
    23,293

    A few quick observations:
    1. There is essentially no spending cut. The MUSK confidence expression that he can cut $1 trillion this year is fake news, given this CR. We've been lied to - but hey, that’s standard practice now.

    2. There are no spending cuts, but the executive branch may now have much more discretion in allocating funds appropriated by Congress. To what extent this is true, I don’t know - I don’t have time to read through the actual CR.

    3. In terms of spending, it’s pretty much business as usual from both Congress and the Executive.

    4. The DEMs will come to regret it when this administration uses the funds to build "freedom cities" and hand out $500 checks to everyone (for their obedience), or ....

    IMO, this was not only worth fighting over but also politically easy to fight over. The CR gives Musk the power to take funds and do as he wishes, while taking government services offline, stealing your private and sensitive data for who knows what, and tossing federal workers, including veterans, into the street like discarded trash. We won't be enabling this.

    The old men in Democratic leadership need to go and make way for more vital and fresh thinkers.

    OLD men and both parties --> This CR and the political maneuver over is pretty hilarious. Business as usual. It's as if everything is political theater.

    Below is Perplexity’s response on how H.R. 1968 (CR) affects the executive branch’s power of the purse (the format is weird, but it’s just a copy/paste).
    "It's important to note that the President does not have the constitutional authority to unilaterally impound or prevent the expenditure of funds appropriated by Congress for specific purposes. The debate around H.R. 1968 centers on whether its provisions might indirectly enable such actions, rather than explicitly granting new powers to the POTUS."

    H.R. 1968, the Full-Year Continuing Appropriations and Extensions Act, 2025, significantly impacts the balance of power between Congress and the executive branch, particularly concerning the "power of the purse." Here is an analysis of how it affects this constitutional authority:

    Key Impacts on Congressional Power
    1. Increased Executive Discretion Over Spending:
      • The bill grants the Trump administration broad discretion to allocate federal funds without requiring explicit Congressional approval. This effectively weakens Congress's constitutional role in deciding how taxpayer money is spent
      • .
    • Creation of "Slush Funds":
      • Critics argue that H.R. 1968 creates mechanisms for the administration to redirect funds toward its priorities, bypassing traditional Congressional oversight. This could allow the President to use federal dollars to further specific agendas without legislative input
      • .
    • Undermining Spending Mandates:
      • Provisions in the bill do not explicitly require the administration to spend appropriated funds as directed by Congress. This raises concerns that funds for programs Congress intended to support could be withheld or redirected entirely
      • .
    • Empowerment of Executive Agencies:
      • The bill aligns with recent executive orders that centralize decision-making within agencies under the President’s control, such as the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). These orders allow agency heads to review and modify contracts, freeze federal credit cards, and cut programs, further consolidating spending power in the executive branch
      • .
    • Weakened Oversight and Guardrails:
      • By ceding control over spending decisions to the executive branch, H.R. 1968 reduces Congress's ability to oversee how funds are used. This lack of accountability has been described as a "blank check" for the administration
      • .
    Broader Implications
    • Erosion of Checks and Balances: The bill shifts significant fiscal authority from Congress to the President, undermining the separation of powers established in Article I of the Constitution.

    • Potential for Abuse: Critics fear this discretion could lead to politically motivated funding decisions or cuts to essential services like education, healthcare, and veterans' benefits
    • .
    • Partisan Divide: The bill has been criticized by Democrats as a partisan measure that prioritizes executive power over democratic accountability
    • .
    In summary, H.R. 1968 significantly diminishes Congress's power of the purse by granting unprecedented spending flexibility to the executive branch, raising concerns about accountability, oversight, and constitutional checks and balances.
     
    #485 Amiga, Mar 15, 2025
    Last edited: Mar 15, 2025
    ROCKSS, HP3, JeffB and 1 other person like this.
  6. SamFisher

    SamFisher Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2003
    Messages:
    61,728
    Likes Received:
    41,148
    This is the extent of the economic plan, if there is one, it's basically turn us into a poor stupid **** hole like Russia or Hungary



    ‪David Atkins‬ ‪@davidoatkins.bsky.social‬

    ·
    24m
    Trump and Musk are basically trying to deskill America:

    1) kill all white-collar jobs and replace them with AI

    2) kill universities

    3) use tariffs to turn the U.S. into an economic island manufacturing, oil and ag hub

    4) empty the cities

    5) push men into manual labor & women back into the kitchen

     
  7. astros123

    astros123 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2013
    Messages:
    13,485
    Likes Received:
    10,875


    Destroying the economy to own the libs and his braindead supporters eat it up @Space Ghost
     
    AleksandarN likes this.
  8. SamFisher

    SamFisher Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2003
    Messages:
    61,728
    Likes Received:
    41,148
    I'm going to post this a million times

    [​IMG]
     
    Nook, AleksandarN and HP3 like this.
  9. SamFisher

    SamFisher Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2003
    Messages:
    61,728
    Likes Received:
    41,148
    ROCKSS, Nook, AleksandarN and 2 others like this.
  10. Sweet Lou 4 2

    Sweet Lou 4 2 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2007
    Messages:
    39,181
    Likes Received:
    20,334
    What do you want them to do?
     
    astros123 likes this.
  11. Sweet Lou 4 2

    Sweet Lou 4 2 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2007
    Messages:
    39,181
    Likes Received:
    20,334
    Nothing, the purpose to the tariffs is to weaken the US and western economies. Also Trump and co short positioned the stock market - so they want to drive the markets down to make money.

    This is why they don't care about the stock market performance of late, and make up stuff like fentanyl as the reason behind the tariffs.
     
    astros123 likes this.
  12. AleksandarN

    AleksandarN Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2001
    Messages:
    5,078
    Likes Received:
    6,754
    With how much gold he decorated the White House I wouldn’t be surprised how holdings they have in gold. You know Trump loves gold.
     
  13. astros123

    astros123 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2013
    Messages:
    13,485
    Likes Received:
    10,875


    Destroying the economy to own the libs @GOATuve
     
    ROCKSS and No Worries like this.
  14. Invisible Fan

    Invisible Fan Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2001
    Messages:
    45,954
    Likes Received:
    28,046
    Good luck to them if that's their intention. Everyone hates taxpayer fueled bailouts and Fed puts until they see their 401ks. Trump will likely pivot and this guy will be thrown under the bus.

    The deliberate, wonkish Wall Street veteran who once called for the gradual implementation of new trade barriers has transformed into a bullhorn for President Donald Trump’s MAGA 2.0 agenda, making it clear that short-term market reactions are secondary to administration priorities such as sweeping tariffs.

    As financial markets suffered the most precipitous drop in years this week, Bessent went on television earlier this month and argued that the U.S. needs to “detox” itself off government spending. And he raised eyebrows in a recent speech by declaring that “access to cheap goods is not the essence of the American Dream.” He also said he was “less concerned” about the short-term economic impact of tariffs.

    When pressed on a recent market sell-off that pushed down the S&P 500 by more than 10 percent from its recent peak, he said that “corrections are healthy.”

    “What’s not healthy is straight up, that you get these euphoric markets. That’s how you get a financial crisis,” he said during an appearance on NBC’s “Meet the Press” on Sunday. “I’m not worried about the markets. Over the long term, if we put good tax policy in place, deregulation and energy security, the markets will do great.”

    This wasn’t what many on Wall Street expected.

    “He definitely has not played the role to date that the markets had expected,” said Sarah Bianchi, a senior managing director at investment bank advisory firm Evercore ISI. “It’s always hard for anyone to figure out when and how to go to the president and say you need a big course correction — and it’s particularly hard in Trump 2.0.”

    Bessent’s muted reassurances to financial markets shows there may be no one in the administration willing to stand in the way of Trump’s emboldened mandate for reshaping U.S. economic policy. Stock market convulsions, along with the advice of conventional economic policymakers like Trump’s first Treasury secretary, Steven Mnuchin, helped temper the president’s protectionist and potentially calamitous priorities during his previous stint in the White House.

    Now, “whatever the guard rails that were in place the first administration no longer exist,” said one former Trump administration official, who was granted anonymity to speak candidly.

     
    ROCKSS, Nook and Andre0087 like this.
  15. SamFisher

    SamFisher Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2003
    Messages:
    61,728
    Likes Received:
    41,148
    Woah, right wing techbro Paul Graham is surprised when the conventionally predictable consequences of MAGA go off exactly as predicted

    Maybe he's not as smart as he thinks he is ?
     
    astros123 likes this.
  16. SamFisher

    SamFisher Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2003
    Messages:
    61,728
    Likes Received:
    41,148
    I've seen people cite this as a way to rationalize the madness & stupidity & malignancy - but I don't buy it.

    Sometimes people are just dumb, stupid & evil - especially people with great power & wealth - who tend to overestimate their own abilities
     
  17. El_Conquistador

    El_Conquistador King of the D&D, The Legend, #1 Ranking

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2002
    Messages:
    15,503
    Likes Received:
    6,500
    Our debt and interest expense is simply not sustainable. Without DOGE slashing spending, our country will be in financial ruin. Trump is doing what other Presidents have lacked the courage to do. Take the political heat by slashing federal spending in order to literally save the country in the long term. There is no greater patriotic act.



    GOOD DAY
     
  18. astros123

    astros123 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2013
    Messages:
    13,485
    Likes Received:
    10,875


    Doge has only found 8.6 billion dollars of waste while house Republicans added 4 trillion dollars in deficit induced tax cuts.

    Why does MAGA everyone is just as braindead as they are when they speak in public. Were not morons and were not in a cult. You can't fool us with your garbage

    Complain about interest payments while passing trillions in cuts.
     
  19. SamFisher

    SamFisher Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2003
    Messages:
    61,728
    Likes Received:
    41,148
    Lol that manufacturing sentiment

    [​IMG]

    Is this bad?
     
    Nook likes this.
  20. Sweet Lou 4 2

    Sweet Lou 4 2 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2007
    Messages:
    39,181
    Likes Received:
    20,334
    Rationalize?

    You act like Trump is the one concocting these plans.
     

Share This Page