Who cares about clean air and water. Who wants more soot and mercury? ****ing idiot. Trump takes an ax to more than a dozen pollution rules in rapid-fire deregulation https://www.cnn.com/2025/03/12/climate/trump-ev-power-plant-rollbacks/index.html
Of course he is. He doesn't care who gets cancer or dies from chemicals in the air, land, or water. His country club and resort isn't near any petrochemical companies. It doesn't affect him, and that's always his priority. He is doing what the oil barons paid him to do. Greed is an ugly thing when it harms others.
Who cares about clean air? I do. That's why I drive an EV. Meanwhile the left went from mandating EVs to burning Teslas. And Democrats cheer enthusiastically as thes fires create massive amounts of pollution. So ya, nobody really cares about the environment
You are so ****ing intellectually dishonest you can’t even comment on what Trump did. You are a pathetic shill for the right.
Why would I share a YouTube video. You know the deregulations. Why don’t you think for yourself. But you won’t because you are intellectually dishonest
No, I don't. I know very little about regulations. So why would you think I would know anything about these regulations? I'm literally so confused. Did you mean for me to make up some bullshit like you do just for argument sake?
Tesla is no longer the only EV player. There are plenty of much better choices for the conscious consumer or Musk haters. BTW, it could very well be a Trump voter who got pissed at Musk for cutting his job. There's a lot of hate toward that guy all around. So yeah, plenty of people care about the environment. In fact, almost everyone does.
Oh look you are “acting ignorant” again when it is time to call out the right. Are you this dishonest in person?
It's every country for themselves yall. The race to the bottom already started a long time ago. Ironically, China is now best positioned for helping countries meet sustainability targets but turriffs... Europe needs to figure out how they can reboot their manufacturing. Offshoring every dirty thing to China was one reason how they had their once best in class solar tech stolen from them like candy from a baby. www.politico.eu /article/europe-green-laws-economy-environment-red-tape-regulations/ Brussels to slash green laws in bid to save Europe’s ailing economy – POLITICO The Commission is siding with businesses after years of backlash against its overzealous environmental rulemaking. The European Commission will radically simplify EU green regulations in a bid to jumpstart Europe’s struggling industry and compete with faster-growing economies in Asia and America. The changes will affect three laws that force companies to take more responsibility for their environmental impacts, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said. Business had complained these rules were complicated and onerous, and suffocated Europe’s competitiveness. It’s a decisive pivot away from the Green Deal program of the last five years, which put climate and the environment at the center of European lawmaking. The hope was that where Europe went, the world would follow. But the latest retreat suggests Brussels no longer trusts this narrative, and is worried its green regulations in their current form will have a negative economic impact — a fear shared by a growing number of European countries, businesses, and economic experts. It also reflects Europe’s new political reality, where a shift to the right in national governments and European Parliament has brought rising skepticism about Europe’s environmental regulations. Less is more Von der Leyen said earlier this month she would trigger a legislative procedure to simplify three of the EU’s flagship environmental laws from the last mandate: the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive, the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive and the EU Taxonomy. The reporting rules were introduced in the last mandate as part of the European Green Deal, — the bloc’s package of environmental regulation. They require businesses to provide extensive information about their environmental footprint, exposure to climate risk and contribution to the green transition. To comply, businesses must disclose environmental information about their own operations, and their supply chains. They are among the most far-reaching green reporting rules anywhere in the world. The announcement, which received little attention at the time, was made just days after the re-election of Donald Trump as the next U.S. president — a climate change skeptic who has promised to withdraw from the Paris climate agreement for a second time, slash regulation, and impose trade tariffs on all imports into the country. Speaking to reporters at a press conference following the informal European Council in Budapest in early November, von der Leyen said her decision would reduce reporting burdens “in one step,” but without compromising the intentions of the directives. “The questions we are asking, the data points we are collecting — thousands of them — is too much, often redundant, often overlapping. So it’s our task to reduce this bureaucratic burden without changing the correct content of the law that we all want,” she said. The announcement came after member countries said during the Council meeting that the EU needs “a simplification revolution” to ease regulatory burdens on businesses coming from Brussels, and boost competitiveness. Growing increasingly concerned that the region is crippling itself with the so-called “red tape,” country leaders also asked the Commission to make “concrete proposals on reducing reporting requirements by at least 25 percent in the first half of 2025.” The Commission has heeded these calls already. In October, the Commission caved under pressure to propose a delay to the EU anti-deforestation rules, to give businesses more time before having to prove the products they sell and materials they use are not linked to deforested land. Von der Leyen has also tasked all European commissioners-to-be, particularly Valdis Dombrovkis, who is taking on the economy and productivity portfolio, with cutting red tape. In the line of fire Criticism of EU corporate disclosure regulation is not new. In a leaked policy paper drafted by former German Finance Minister Christian Lindner, the minister said Berlin should seek to abolish the EU regulation on sustainability reporting rules, among others. The suggestion echoed one made by French Prime Minister Michele Barnier in October, arguing that some aspects of the EU’s rules on corporate sustainability reporting be delayed by up to three years. But there’s a long time between the moment EU countries express their discontent with EU law and when Brussels actually does something about it. Not everyone is convinced by von der Leyen’s assurances that simplification won’t lead to a weakening of the regulations. “Of course I’m worried,” said Marie Toussaint, a French Greens MEP and a former shadow rapporteur on the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive. After all, the proposed delay to the deforestation law ultimately prompted center-right lawmakers in the European People’s Party (EPP) — von der Leyen’s political group — to attempt to water it down. The common political line in the European Parliament and among EU countries, Toussaint argues, is to blame regulation — specifically environmental rules — for the lack of competitiveness in Europe. “It’s the opposite of what we were saying five years ago, which was [that] defending European competitiveness is ensuring we have the best products, produced in the best conditions,” she said.
Doesn’t seem to cause significant harm to the environment or substantially increase greenhouse gas emissions. The proposed changes in the EU Omnibus Package primarily focus on simplifying, delaying, or reducing requirements, especially for smaller companies (basically narrowing the scope of regulations to larger companies). This seems more like a correction to an overzealous regulatory package than a complete 180. It also primarily deals with greenhouse emissions. The EPA rules rollback is more significant. It rolls back regulations on soot, mercury, and coal emissions. It also weakens the "Good Neighbor Rule" (which prevents polluting a neighbor's air). It made some rash changes that resulted in errors (but that's pretty common with this administration). Most importantly, this isn’t just about greenhouse emissions; it’s also about clean air and water. https://www.sierraclub.org/press-re...ollbacks-are-wholesale-attack-american-people https://www.reuters.com/sustainabil...ider-biden-clean-power-plant-rule-2025-03-12/ https://earthjustice.org/press/2025...s-trumps-epa-signals-new-deregulatory-efforts
It's a random bunch of extremists burning cars. Remember when Trump was so anti-EV, and mocked them? "They don’t go far. They cost a lot of money. They got some basic problems. They're very expensive and they don't go far. I think they want to keep you somewhere around your home. They don't want to build highways or something." Now he's promoting his big donor Musk's EV line on infomercials courtesy of the White House. SMH at the hypocrite and grifter.
Trump has everyone all twisted up. But instead of looking at each action individually folks have to stick to party lines and either be all in or all against.
Their economy heavily banked on cheap Russian gas while promoting it as green energy. Germany couldn't keep their factories on 24/7 due to energy shortages and resulted to restarting coal plants during the height of the crisis. I don't like Trump's moves. We should be leading by example with more emphasis on innovation over words. But there's also a race to the bottom vibe as we collectively exploit the most resources to stay afloat in the rat race.
