1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Everytime someone mentions something about banging trash cans

Discussion in 'Houston Astros' started by strosb4bros, Feb 18, 2025.

  1. strosb4bros

    strosb4bros Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2025
    Messages:
    478
    Likes Received:
    224
    Non stop post this

    MLB's Manfred: Blame system, not Dodgers for payroll disparity - ESPN


    The Dodgers' competitive balance tax payroll is currently estimated at about $392 million, well beyond the highest threshold, according to Spotrac. Only the New York Mets, a distant second at roughly $321 million, have even cracked $300 million. And while offseason spending has reached $4.6 billion, the Dodgers and Mets have accounted for nearly a quarter of that total. Eight teams, meanwhile, spent $50 million or less this winter.

    "Disparity should be, it certainly is, at the top of my list of concerns about what's occurring in the sport," Manfred said. "When I say I can't be critical of the Dodgers -- they're doing what the system allows. If I'm going to be critical of somebody, it's not going to be the Dodgers. It's going to be the system."


    This is what an actual unfair advantage is. You know, the thing we try to outlaw in professional sports. Absolutely pathetic to casually have a $400 million payroll deferring payments while the Stros carefully manage the books and lose Tucker, Bregman, Cole, etc. because they have to follow a business plan
     
    cmoak1982, rusHour, IBTL and 3 others like this.
  2. Hey Now!

    Hey Now! Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2000
    Messages:
    14,526
    Likes Received:
    5,526
    The Astros do not "have" to follow a business plan. Any and every team can spend like the Dodgers or Mets. There is nothing stopping them.

    We need to stop carrying water for 28 billionaires who constantly cry poverty, villainize the players, bully municipalities into paying for stadiums - all while pocketing tens of millions of dollars on an investment that has risen in value. The Dodgers and Mets are not the issue.

    Personally, I don't have any issue with how Crane runs the team - generally, he spends and I appreciate that, at least when he has a competent GM, he understands the market and how to balance past/present/future costs.
     
    Snake Diggit, cbass, eric.81 and 5 others like this.
  3. IBTL

    IBTL Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2010
    Messages:
    15,560
    Likes Received:
    15,766
    Wet and ready, ain't talkin bout that water.
     
  4. Qan

    Qan Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2012
    Messages:
    5,014
    Likes Received:
    7,190
    I can never side with billionaires when it comes to lack of spending. More power to players getting paid. But I can't hate on owners wanting to run a sports team without good gains like any company, for without them, cities like Houston will never have a sports team. It's too bad Astros don't draw in as much revenue as the Dodgers to incentivize Crane & Co. to spend without a care in the world. Of course some owners are just mtherfcking stingy and don't spend at all, no matter how much profit the team brings them...fck those guys.

    It's all business.
     
  5. Major

    Major Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 1999
    Messages:
    41,681
    Likes Received:
    16,205
    The players and owners specifically agreed to the system in place - no one tried to outlaw it.
     
    awc713 and raining threes like this.
  6. Hey Now!

    Hey Now! Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2000
    Messages:
    14,526
    Likes Received:
    5,526
    It does feel a little loop-hole-y; I suspect MLB feels the same way and will address it - because doesn't it impact the CBT and allow owners to pay less?

    Having said that, that we direct our ire at the owners who spend, rather than the owner who don't - that's messed up. I think Crane is a good owner. I'd love for him to be financially irresponsible but I completely understand why he isn't, and most of his "cheap" decisions are firmly rooted in both an economic reality as well as baseball-smart decision-making.

    But there are WAY too many owners who do *nothing* and get away with it. That's who fans from every city should be mad at.
     
    eric.81 and raining threes like this.
  7. IdStrosfan

    IdStrosfan Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2021
    Messages:
    8,716
    Likes Received:
    10,924
    This is true to a point, but the system needs to be changed.

    The problem is that NY, LA, and a few others to a lesser extent have access to bigger revenue streams and the CBT penalties are too little to really hurt them but big enough to hurt and deter mid and lower level markets.

    The system is perfect to help the big markets while holding the mid to lower level ones down.

    They need a hard ceiling and floor.

    Since the MLBPA is very very against that, they need to raise the minimum teams must spend to qualify for revenue sharing which will bring more competition for FA, raise the CBT so mid market teams are not penalized and significantly increase the penalties for going over it so big market teams actually hurt if they do it.
     
    Jake Tower, Qan, Snake Diggit and 3 others like this.
  8. Qan

    Qan Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2012
    Messages:
    5,014
    Likes Received:
    7,190
    The new CBA negotiation is gonna be a doozy. Get ready for a lockout.
     
  9. The Beard

    The Beard Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2012
    Messages:
    11,364
    Likes Received:
    7,107
    Unfortunately, this is very true
     
    raining threes likes this.
  10. Hey Now!

    Hey Now! Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2000
    Messages:
    14,526
    Likes Received:
    5,526
    You're leaving out what I think is an important part of this equation: depending on service time, owners can grossly underpay superstar players for 6, sometimes 7 seasons.

    So, yes - we often see those players eventually flee for big-market deals. But every team can cost-control them through the bulk of their prime. So why is no effort made to spend around an underpaid superstar (the Pirates are going to pay Paul Skenes less than a $1MM this season)? Why do we allow those same owners to cry poverty?

    An imbalance does not grant owners the right to do nothing. Sorry! It just frustrates me that the owners have been so successful at getting fans to gobble up their bullshit (not you, per se - but, generally, it's far more likely for fans to call players out for being greedy than owners out for being cheap.)
     
  11. IdStrosfan

    IdStrosfan Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2021
    Messages:
    8,716
    Likes Received:
    10,924
    I agree with this point.

    And just FTR ( I know you acknowledged not including me) look over my past posts, I have been very vocal about this inequality based on service time as well as fans being pro-owner on that issue.
     
    Hey Now! likes this.
  12. IBTL

    IBTL Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2010
    Messages:
    15,560
    Likes Received:
    15,766
    Greedy ****s.
     
    #12 IBTL, Feb 19, 2025
    Last edited: Feb 19, 2025
  13. IBTL

    IBTL Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2010
    Messages:
    15,560
    Likes Received:
    15,766
    Like hell they aren't the issue. I swear I'm dumber for having read any of your posts.
     
  14. GOATuve

    GOATuve Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2023
    Messages:
    3,983
    Likes Received:
    3,358
    I don't think you can get dumber
     
    Hey Now! likes this.
  15. IBTL

    IBTL Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2010
    Messages:
    15,560
    Likes Received:
    15,766
    Silence b**** boy.
     
  16. GOATuve

    GOATuve Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2023
    Messages:
    3,983
    Likes Received:
    3,358
    I don't listen to you. Dance. You're my puppet
     
  17. Tomstro

    Tomstro Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2016
    Messages:
    25,595
    Likes Received:
    22,637
    I agree with most of this. However, Drayton and especially the guy before him, McMullen, were called out fairly often for being cheap.
     
    Jake Tower and Hey Now! like this.
  18. strosb4bros

    strosb4bros Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2025
    Messages:
    478
    Likes Received:
    224
    It's not actually fair to put this on the owners. They're billionaires, but it's still a business.

    However, it's not retail. It's the SPORTING business where fair play is what makes the fans interested.

    So when the Dodgers earn $300-400 million more in revenue due to local media contracts and sponsorships than every team outside of New York, and there's no distribution model for that money, then it is absolutely an unfair advantage. No one anywhere will actively fund a loss making project. Even the guy with $300 billion like Elon couldn';t run twitter at a loss.

    While you have extremes like Oakland.. for the most part, owners with a chance to win spend. But when that spend caps out at $200-230 million, while the Dodgers keep looting their marquee talent with 9 figure contract after 9 figure contract.. you have a lack of competitive fairness.

    LA is all about inclusion and fairness... so let's petition for them to include local media contracts into the revenue sharing model.
    You'll see a fire sale real quick if that happens.
     
    Jake Tower, Htown Stros and Stephen66 like this.
  19. strosb4bros

    strosb4bros Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2025
    Messages:
    478
    Likes Received:
    224
    Again, none of those owners (outside of new york) have access to the extra $300 million a year (as stated on ESPN today) the Dodgers do of local media contracts and exclusive sponsorships. They can only generate so much revenue in their markets no matter how good a team they field. So you can cap spending at $250-300 million per team OR share revenue from the local media contracts... which LA and NY will absolutely not want to do.

    Having payrolls around $400 million has nothing to do with the "generosity" of the owner, but of the unfair advantage in revenue's.
     
  20. Htown Stros

    Htown Stros Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2015
    Messages:
    6,535
    Likes Received:
    8,975
    No, not every team can spend like the Dodgers and Mets. Can’t believe how many people actually liked this comment.
     
    jjsmooth, Jake Tower and IBTL like this.

Share This Page