1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Rockets, Jalen Green agree to 3-year, $106M deal

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by J.R., Oct 21, 2024.

?

Do you like the deal?

Poll closed Apr 21, 2025.
  1. YES

    71.8%
  2. NO

    28.2%
  1. DaDakota

    DaDakota Balance wins
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 1999
    Messages:
    128,521
    Likes Received:
    38,752
    They would give us a FRP to take Zack's salary.

    DD
     
  2. RHU525

    RHU525 Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2002
    Messages:
    5,712
    Likes Received:
    8,012
    Sign me up. They can have Steven adams too,
     
  3. yixiixiy

    yixiixiy Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2010
    Messages:
    2,948
    Likes Received:
    5,174
    Are they not taking Jalen Green’s salary? Lavine is also playing very well this season so far.


     
  4. astrosrule

    astrosrule Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2002
    Messages:
    7,701
    Likes Received:
    7,599
    If we just sent them expiring money sure, but zach is way better than jalen and his contract is a year shorter. You’re not getting zach and a pick for jalen, that’s lunacy
     
  5. OremLK

    OremLK Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2010
    Messages:
    20,070
    Likes Received:
    17,677
    Voter fatigue is real, otherwise I'd agree

    Edit: Well, and I'd be surprised if he doesn't have one or multiple seasons where he misses a majority of the games due to injury.
     
  6. Reeko

    Reeko Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2017
    Messages:
    52,192
    Likes Received:
    143,587
    a career 33% 3 point shooter that is currently shooting 30.7% having a 49% 3 point attempt rate on the season is some nasty work

    his midrange remains extremely poor, and he doesn’t want to drive to the rim
     
    xtruroyaltyx likes this.
  7. MadMax

    MadMax Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 1999
    Messages:
    76,683
    Likes Received:
    25,924
    Someone will respond to say he can’t drive to the rim cause the paint is clogged. And someone else will reply to say Jalen’s inability to shoot is a huge reason why the paint is clogged. Wash. Rinse. Repeat.
     
  8. sealclubber1016

    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    21,300
    Likes Received:
    34,197
    17 shots and 8 threes per game, from a guy who who has never even managed a league average TS%.

    It's not exactly a recipe for a good offense
     
    glynch likes this.
  9. Thrilla

    Thrilla Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2002
    Messages:
    1,554
    Likes Received:
    2,412
    Even with the way Lavine is playing, he would not garner any positive value back in a trade, and in many trade scenarios additional value, such as pick(s) would have to be attached to Lavine.

    Chicago traded Caruso for a project in Giddey instead of pursuing draft picks, which, given the reports, were certainly offered by numerous teams. It is possible they would see some upside in taking a flyer on Jalen. However, the third year of Jalen's contract being a PO does make taking a flyer on Jalen less desirable and potentially impossible. The question is, would any other team be willing to trade expiring or more desirable multi-year contracts than Jalen's for Lavine because it seems inevitable that the Bulls will and should embrace a rebuild? It is the Bulls, so who knows? Maybe their ownership is content with being a play-in team.

    If the team does not buy into Jalen's upside in a new situation then I struggle to see Jalen having any positive value given his horrendous play and new contract. A scorer who cannot score. a high-volume shooter who is one of the least efficient shooters. A play-maker and primary option who has low-IQ, and struggles to even make the most basic of reads. I could go on and on, but we all know who Jalen is and what he is not.

    How far Jalen has fallen that we are talking about trading him for Lavine who in years past could not even be given away for free. It is a moot point because this would be a gigantic admittance of failure from Stone and the front office to trade Jalen for Lavine so shortly after inking Jalen to a new undeserved contract. It is the same thing we saw Stone do with KPJ - Double down on his pet projects instead of accepting sunk costs and moving on. It is concerning moving forward.
     
  10. astrosrule

    astrosrule Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2002
    Messages:
    7,701
    Likes Received:
    7,599
    Ultimately, why would the bulls trade a better player on a better contract for a worse player on a worse contract AND attach assets? Would be insane
     
  11. deb4rockets

    deb4rockets Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2013
    Messages:
    24,742
    Likes Received:
    31,856
    Yeah, the fact is he's just not good enough, and hasn't improved his shooting at all. Remember when folks went nuts screaming about Westbrook and his 3's? Lots of people hated him on our team. LOL. Sure, Westbrook was a bad 3 PT shooter, but he took less than 4 three's a game. He was a 47.2% FG shooter though, and averaged. 7.9 rebounds a game, 7.0 assists, and 1.6 steals per game. Jalen averages 4.8 rebounds, 2.4 assists, and 0.9 steals. Westbrook's turnovers and 3 PT shooting were his biggest weaknesses, but he had other positives that compensated for it. He didn't jack up a bunch of bricks per game and his asst/turnover ratio was around the same as Harden at 1.6. Look at Jalen's assist/turnover ratio this year. It's 2.7/2.4.

    I just don't get all the excuses for Jalen being our starting shooting guard. It would be different if he was making huge progress in his proficiency each year but he isn't. He isn't a great passer either, or some kid with a great basketball IQ. I just don't get the fandom. We have other young guys that I think have more promise, but I'd definitely love to see us sign a better SG before playoffs, and trade Jalen, Cam, and Adams for a true contender.
     
  12. AroundTheWorld

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2000
    Messages:
    83,288
    Likes Received:
    62,280
    He has a nice dunk once in a while though.
     
  13. daywalker02

    daywalker02 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2006
    Messages:
    98,848
    Likes Received:
    48,780
    The fandom of a lot stays the same because otherwise they would have to say sorry and admit that they were incompetent riding a player who has minimal BBIQ......

    They would have to admit that they have had minimum IQ as well rooting for a player like that.

    It is the hardest to change people who are stubborn in their views.

     
  14. HardenReturns

    HardenReturns Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2023
    Messages:
    1,725
    Likes Received:
    2,184
    He's bouncy as the Jumping Jews of Jerusalem though.
     
  15. jayhow92

    jayhow92 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2011
    Messages:
    8,804
    Likes Received:
    6,080
    He’s already a negative asset and he hasn’t even started the next contract.
     
    NewAge likes this.
  16. Thrilla

    Thrilla Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2002
    Messages:
    1,554
    Likes Received:
    2,412
    That really depends, DD, on the Bulls still believing in the "potential" of Jalen as well as what direction the Bulls take - Embrace the rebuild or stay in mediocrity. Jalen's contract does not improve the Bull's cap situation as it expires a year after Lavine's and that last year is a PO, so that is not a selling point for trading for Jalen.

    If the Bulls want to rebuild then trading for Jalen would be a viable option as he is not going to help the Bulls win any games, and in place of Lavine, will help them lose more games. The Bulls would be taking a gamble on Jalen improving while he helps them tank. However, is that gamble worth being stuck with his contract for an extra year when they could just let Lavine walk a year earlier? The Bulls could still tank without trading Lavine by trading some of their other guys who have value or at least can be traded for expiring contracts. Guys like Vuc, and White.

    While it is fun to dreamcast shipping Jalen out, Stone would never make this trade because it would admit that drafting Jalen was a colossal mistake. I hope that singing Jalen to the extension does not have collateral damage, such as not being able to afford to resign Tari and Amen who will command a big payday, and deservingly so.
     
  17. HardenReturns

    HardenReturns Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2023
    Messages:
    1,725
    Likes Received:
    2,184
    Q'n: Do you like the deal?
    Yes: 72.8%
    No: 27.2%

    Well, looking at the results of the (Oct. 21, '24) poll, almost 3 out of every 4 fans still are imbeciles.
     
    daywalker02 likes this.
  18. jayhow92

    jayhow92 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2011
    Messages:
    8,804
    Likes Received:
    6,080
    Them trading Zach for a guy whose production is at a Jordan Clarkson level on a worse contract would be a tough sell.

    But then again, it’s the Bulls and they make awful moves consistently. Trading for Giddey, the Veucevic trade and plenty of other bad moves in recent years.
     
    astrosrule likes this.
  19. daywalker02

    daywalker02 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2006
    Messages:
    98,848
    Likes Received:
    48,780


     
    HardenReturns likes this.
  20. Thrilla

    Thrilla Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2002
    Messages:
    1,554
    Likes Received:
    2,412
    I am not saying that the Bulls would consider trading Lavine and additional assets for Jalen. I do see it as plausible that the Bulls would entertain a straight-up trade for Jalen, but this depends on various variables, such as if the Bulls decide to rebuild and if they believe that a change of scenery could unlock some of Jalen's potential.
     

Share This Page