Musharraf warns Israel of dire consequences against attack on Iran

Not to be flippant, but I'd put my money on Israel in that showdown.

Israel does what is best for their own interests.

Who do you think the US would support in such a conflagration?

 

more than saddam, a stronger case can be made for removing musharraf from power.

more connections to al queda and the taliban; has weapons of mass destruction which he threatens to use (before these threats on israel, he has threatened india); people in his govt sell nuclear weapons designs to iran, libya, north korea(his involvement in this is still unclear)....

of course, if you remove him, the people that take his place could be much worse. and i think thats what frightens india, israel, and the US. but i cant see what could be much worse than a person that has been responsible for bringing 1/6th of the world on the brink of war on numerous occassions (see kargil war 1999, support of terrorists in india 1989 - present)

 

mulletman.

i don't understand your point on

who has the right to go into another country and say your government or leader is inadequate. who is to deliver this power. taking people's freedom in human society is huge. it's been a major reason to why wars have take place.
and secondly where do you think Pakistan got its neclear capabilities? they did'nt figure it out by themselves. your answer: China. why not go after china. because it will cause WWIII. there are politics behind politics which
you don't see in the news. India is supported actually by the U.S. Pakistan has China. that's the way it has been for a LONG time.

just a question to anyone who can answer this question.

For what reason did the U.S help Saddam assasinate the
previous Iraq regime, and place Saddam as ruler?