Tyreek Hill stop video released

I know that we (west) wanted Zoran to be y'alls leader but ya assassinated him, as a result we made sure ya lost Montenegro n Kosovo for good.

I'm done bro, think w/e you want of this or me, but I might know more than you think. Have a good night bro

 

There's nothing to talk about. The man didn't comply, hopefully in the future he'll make better decisions. He got away scot-free/no harm no foul.

P.S. You've edited your post, not being cute, I had to know the history, language and everything of your people to blend in, you're just surprised of my knowledge

 

Well I'll still take that as a compliment (the last sentence at least).

 

Better football player but worse person than Rison… I don’t think Rison beat the mother of his child or beat his son and almost broke his arm.

Hill is a problem - a dangerous person who has choked out women before… but he is also probably the best receiving weapon since Randy Moss.

 

You keep saying that, but I don't know what you mean

 

If everyone followed the law, we wouldn't need LEOs, right? So by definition, most of the people getting detained are not "average". We need LEOs, as the only person on the scene that is being paid to be there, to remain professional.

So again, this isn't about how you would respond. Out of 100 people that get pulled over, it's predictable some of them won't behave as you would. Is that license for LEO to lower their standard of professionalism?

 

Police behavior, particularly as it relates to African Americans, is not a teeny tiny issue. It's a recurring theme. In general, black people don't trust or even respect LEO. This situation did nothing to help that fact.

History: The first organized police forces were established for the express purpose of rounding up run away slaves. Decades ago, Public Enemy had a hit song about "F the police". To this day, people of color are disproportionally incarcerated.

So no, it's not a teeny tiny issue. And this officer did not help the cause.

 

Let's compare the pool of people that get detained by the police versus the public at large. What % of those detained people would you say are "half-decent humans?" By definition, if you get detained by the police, it's cause you are a criminal. So the police are naturally exposed to unsavory people in the course of their day.

So if LEO should encounter an unsavory person, is that license for them to behave less than professional?

That is similar to blaming a rape victim for wearing a sexy outfit. Just cause the other person does something you wouldn't, that doesn't justify bad behavior in return.

But again, LEO is the only person on the scene that is being paid to be there and should have the training to deal with difficult situations.

 

Only reason I could see it getting that heated so fast is if they say him speeding several times. It sounded like/looked like other officers were already following him? There were about 6 officers there pretty quick so maybe they were already following him? Or maybe they were just in the area for traffic control. If it was just the one stop though, and they weren't trying to get to him for awhile, it escalated pretty quickly.

 

So what you're saying is a police officer should cater/adjust to you? N not the other way around? What world do you live in?

Follow orders, its not that hard as a grown up/adult, you've been doing it since you were 3 years old. If you can't - you're either a loose cannon, can't function in our society, or your parents failed you, there's no other explanation.

 

Hill is scumbag but cops are horrible.

 

The world I live in, as a professional, is I attempt to prepare for unexpected situations. Again, this isn't about how you feel people "should" behave.

In the military (and in business), they do contingency planning. You make a plan and then you brainstorm how that plan can go wrong. You make educated guesses for how the plan will fail and then you build IF THEN statements or plans. Cliche: Fail to plan, plan to fail.

It is predictable the police will encounter belligerent or uncooperative people. The person was either already having a bad day, or now they are so they are under severe stress. Since that is a known variable, the police need to be trained how to not take a situation, impart themselves into it, and make it worse. It's not an excuse ...it's a factual statement. I'm 100% confident I can find scientific backing that humans under stress are more prone to make judgement errors.

It's like the referee who makes a bad call and then ejects the player. As a fan, that is the worst! The ref gets caught up in the emotion, escalates the situation, and in the end, everyone loses. Makes him look bad. Player looks bad. The spectators get an inferior product. It's predictable the players will get emotional. The refs are supposed to be the level headed one and be impartial. That's what they are paid to do.

 

Nobody cares about Tyreek Hill…

 

This is a horrible analogy.

There very much are expectations regarding conduct for athletes and if an athlete fails in that they face the appropriate consequences.

It's only biased fans who believe the situation is the referees fault most of the time. That's nonsense. The referees are making judgments and it's incumbent on the players to accept those calls in a respectful and proper manner. Not for referees to put up with foul and abusive behavior from athletes.

People believing referees are the problem in sport and not the athletes poor conduct is so laughably on point here.

 

I disagree. Once you get pulled over, you've done something wrong (most of the time), n thats the reason you're interacting with him, now you've entered his world, you should and will act accordingly, n if you can't thats on you.

If you don't wanna do all that don't break the law

 

People in here would have you believe it's ok to treat civil servants like ****.

Then they will throw out, "I'm not defending Hills conduct" but then say the officer acted incorrectly without explaining what an appropriate response by the officer for Hills poor conduct would be? I'm waiting to hear what consequences Hill should have faced for his poor conduct if you think the conduct undertaken by the officers was "inappropriate" or "excessive" - the truth is these people thinks the cops should just eat it and be treated like ****.

Hill was taken from his car, not injured and briefly detained. A mild consequence for his poor behavior. That's a perfectly appropriate result.

Most in here though would rather we all live in a society where we treat public servants like **** and suffer no consequences. Great suggestions everyone.