You can tell it's a right wing publication because it wants to frame both candidates as "stupid". The GOP media apparatus understands they can't hide Trump's unhingedness so they create this perception of Harris being uniquely "stupid" for a presidential candidate when in reality she's no more dumb or intelligent than the vast majority of candidates like Romney, McCain, the Bushes etc.
Viewers that are more wonkish will focus on the subjects and Harris will easily win with those viewers. The general viewer isn't wonkish has a general feeling for each candidate and will judge it on different criteria. A stylish performance or witty remark can can win the day for either candidate. Harris might have a slight edge, but it will be pretty close. If the debate is tiresome and boring because candidates are just going back and forth over each other, that hurts Harris. Trump would have the advantage. My guess is Harris with a slight positive takeaway on the evening. But I don't feel strongly one way or the other.
I was listening to some pundits saying that Harris’ team is actually much more focused on impression than on just facts and policy. That she is not looking to win a factual debate or slog it out against Trump
Holy shiit. Kamala is all over the damn place and never answered the damn question. Are you better off now than 4 years ago?
