Of course. Humans go toward the path of least resistance. Most middle class and wealthy people haven't committed a crime because it satisfies their path of least resistance. The less wealthy you are the more likely stuff like petty crime becomes part of your path of least resistance. And you are still bisexual if you can be convinced to have a sexual attraction to the same sex.
Yes because now they don't have to hide it. There's also more black/white interracial couples than there were 60 years ago. Does that bother you too? Why does it bother you if there's more gay **** around? Just ignore and keep walking. I don't stare at gay couples making out but I don't stare at straight couples either. You're ****ing weird
No parent teaches children to be petty criminals. The lack of opportunities turning to cynicism and nihilism is what eventually leads to things like petty criminal behavior. A child of a wealthy robber barron famous for corruption isn't more likely to commit petty crime than a child of a poor hardworking adult for example. The child is being taught worse lessons by the parent in the wealthy household than the poor hardworking parent but is less likely to do something like shoplift. Why?
You're very naive. There's also mothers who teach their daughters to be prostitutes. Usually no father is in the house. The government helps make it possible.
Usually sexual exploitation of children happen the most in communities where the concept of "women must obey their husbands" is a literal aspect of life. Hence why you see mass sexual abuse cases trying to be covered up in these male patriarchy dominated communities like the Southern Baptist Convention, Catholic Church and conservative Muslim communities. When you create an infrastructure where women are powerless and are told to obey their horny husbands you get this culture of mass child sexual abuse being covered up to protect the adult men of the community. Single mothers selling their children for sex is far less common than what I described. Another large population pool of child sex trafficking comes from children who were kicked out of ran away from families that didn't accept their sexual identity hence why a disproportionate amount of child sex trafficking is from the teen lgbt community. It's almost all runways or kids who were disowned. Criminals like the path of least resistance and therefore will target children who won't rile up a nation wide search party.
This is why we wanted someone younger. Also as a woman she understands what pokes at the ego of wannabe masculine men like the entire maga movement.
Do you have stats on that because I know several people who are involved in rescue of girls being on streets in Houston, it's a massive problem.
I don't think you are the type to have sincere empathy for poor single mothers to receive objective information and process it. You heard stories... I have actual reporting from the Houston Chronicle when it comes to systemic efforts from patriarchal communities having systemic methods to cover up child sexual exploitation. Also there are studies that tell us that runaway teens and teens that have been kicked out prematurely from their households are the most susceptible to child sex trafficking. I can't find one saying anything about single mothers. https://www.acf.hhs.gov/fysb/fact-sheet/overlap-human-trafficking-and-runaway-and-homeless-youth And let's hypothetically buy into the claim that single mothers are more prone to exploiting their children to sex trafficking relative to the general population of households. What would be the solution to this issue? What would be the solution to the issue that conservative Muslim and Christian communities that place males above women in their hierarchy are more prone to cover up sex abuse of minors to protect the men in the community from consequences? For the former I'm assuming having incentives that provide stable income to not be desperate enough to sell your child... The later? What is the solution to the later? Making sure the girls in these communities receive zero sex education to not be able to verbally express the abuse they experienced from their father or creepy uncle to independent third party officials?
A girl with a father or other strong male presence in her life is far less likely to be promiscuous -- that's just a fact silly to argue otherwise. Some fathers abuse their children. Some mothers abuse their children. We have teachers getting impregnated by their underage students. Most domestic violence (man-woman) is mutual combat. Most 1-way DV is woman on man. The most abusive relationships are lesbian. Women cheat at the same rate, if not more, than men. There's too much information available to continue the "men-bad / women-good" narrative. Music in generally reflects the state of a nation. For every one Meg the Stallion, there's 0.1 Taylor Swift -- and Meg is far more a prostitute within her music. Guess whose father was more present in their life than the other.
Are you that type of creepy dad that likes to rack their shotgun in front of their daughters' date to show how concerned you are over your daughter's virginity? Those type of dudes are more likely to molest their daughters than actually protect them from promiscuity. If a father thinks they are protecting their daughter from sex that daughter is hiding having sex from their father and as soon as she is detached from the grips of her controlling father will be more sexually expressive than ever because that's what teenagers do. Rebel. It's this type of behavior that has protected male figures in communities from being exposed for their sexual exploitation. They pretend their possessiveness of their daughters is a sign of caring about them rather than being sexually jealous.
"Her body, her choice"... right?? The mother *chose* to be a single mother. Obviously I have more empathy than that -- just showing how stupid some of the demo rhetoric is. There should be more incentive to have fathers in the home. She *chose* a loser and birthed his child knowing the government would try its best to save her.
Humans don't plan for pregnancies like this. They don't think "let me pop out a baby because governor benefits". You need to be around more humans in real life to understand their motivations and desires. This is exactly what we mean by "weird". This is a weird narrative. Only weird dudes think this way.
The bottom line is daughters are less like;y to be promiscuous with a strong male presence. Go ahead and argue your scrotum-less, factless points though. It's hilarious. LOL Hilarious
There is no study that suggests this. If a woman is not sexually promiscuous from the fear of a over controlling father that isn't them being protected. That's them being abused and most likely being the ire of their father's jealous desires on themselves. Again society has moved along to understand this type of possessiveness of daughters is weird. It's creepy. That's what we mean by "weird*.
You didn't leave of these premisea from actual real world experiences. You got these talking points from social media algorithims and pundit grifters like Thomas Sowell.
