That's a personal decision. Some people choose to end their own lives to avoid burdening their families, while others, due to religious beliefs, choose to keep life support going indefinitely, even if the person is brain-dead. The debate about what the government should do in these cases is well, sometime complex and emotional. The story here focuses on a father who sought financial help for his disabled son from his uncle, Trump. Trump declined to assist. Given Trump's wealth, the amount requested was relatively small, which is why the story is noteworthy. It highlights Trump's preference for preserving his wealth over helping family members sustain a life.
And I bet there is more to the story than just what you're saying. There typically is when it comes to Trump
Maybe. It's a firsthand account from Fred C. Trump III, Donald Trump's nephew. You can read it here: https://time.com/7002003/donald-trump-disabled-americans-all-in-the-family/
Do you find it wrong to suggest letting people with disabilities die, if the cost to care for them is expensive?
I would say that it is up to the individual being asked to spend the money whether or not they want to spend the money.
You didn't answer my question. Do you find it wrong to just let someone with disabilities die simply because you don't want to spend money to provide the care for they need?
this is how next gen alt-right is made. those kids will grow to hate their parents for this later on.
he is trying desperately to distance himself from Project 2025, but unfortunately for him, the receipts are there and his VP is deeply involved with it as well they are definitely shook right now
He is the king of denial. It comes with the territory when you live every single day of your life as a pathological lying con. He will never admit what is the honest truth. Never.
