I can't say for sure, but something is off with the shadows in that video, as well as the way the shooter merges with the background. I'd say it would probably be best to share these kinds of videos after their authenticity is more confirmed. But that's not going to happen.
good luck getting a response the liberals always ghost or block people when its time to provide evidence for the nonsense they spew online
Remember when Democrats underminded the integrity of the 2016 election with baseless claims of Russian collusion? Or when Democrats have underminded the justice system because they didn’t like the make up of the supreme court even calling for court packing? Guess those events slipped your mind.
You're misrepresenting events. It was not merely "saying a foreign government supports your opponent" There were widely circulated claims the Trump campaign systematically "colluded" with Russian foreign services to win the 2016 election subverting the integrity of the election. The Mueller report found those claims to be baseless.
What about saying the sitting President is an illegitimate President? Does that count as fake news? Is that saying our vote count is fake news?
I searched for any news stories reporting on this video, because it would be huge news if true. I found nothing, but I'd definitely welcome being wrong. (The only video showed the shooting taking place, and not someone crawling on the roof.) This is the story I found about someone who said he witnessed the shooter minutes before the shots. Don't think he took a video. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cn4v7v2g5l1o
Look I'm glad the dude didn't die. I have not reached a point where I wish death on anyone I do have major concerns about shenanigans Probably the biggest election of our lifetime Rocket River
Not sure if I've seen major news stories with the video, but the still shot of the alleged shooter on the roof that has been in many stories seems to have come from that video. I wouldn't believe anything either.
“It was not a witch hunt,” Mueller said during testimony to the House Intelligence Committee, as part of a grueling, six-hour day of questioning by lawmakers about the findings of his report. “It was not a hoax,” he said later/ And in his testimony before the Intelligence panel, Mueller said Trump’s answers were “generally” not truthful. Mueller repeatedly affirmed evidence he gathered that Trump took actions to impede his investigation, and he refuted Trump’s claim that the report showed “no obstruction” and “no collusion” “The president was not exculpated for the acts that he allegedly committed,” Mueller told the House Judiciary Committee, adding that Trump could theoretically be indicted after he leaves office. He added, “We did not address ‘collusion,’ which is not a legal term. Special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 election identified 10 instances of possible obstruction of justice by President Donald Trump.
LOCK HER UP! Former President Trump said Sunday that he never called for former election rival Hillary Clinton to be sent to jail, despite making the demand during his 2016 campaign.
