1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

(ESPN) Jeremy Woo: Rockets have interest in Sheppard, with both the FO and ownership intrigued

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by HealthyHamstring, Jun 19, 2024.

  1. CXbby

    CXbby Member

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2002
    Messages:
    9,081
    Likes Received:
    11,967
    Sheppard is a shooting savant, a pick pocket savant, affects winning savant. He happens to be a good passer too but I haven’t seen anyone call him a PG savant, seems to be made up in YOUR mind.
     
  2. Dobbizzle

    Dobbizzle Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2021
    Messages:
    6,340
    Likes Received:
    9,543
    Yeah "CP3 with a more lethal shot" or Nash as comps isn't implying a PG savant? Put down the crackpipe.
     
    Verbal Christ likes this.
  3. ROXTXIA

    ROXTXIA Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2000
    Messages:
    20,843
    Likes Received:
    12,920
    [​IMG]
     
  4. xtruroyaltyx

    xtruroyaltyx Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2011
    Messages:
    12,457
    Likes Received:
    15,888
    What a stupid remark on so many levels.

    There's reasonable anti Reed arguments and then theres this.

    I'd throw Dobizzle in there also since he has shown he's completely clueless and also a hypocrite.

    Wants to call people out who he says he saw say Reed is CP3 with a shot, but then says he's only seen him be a "connective passer".

    Some of this **** you just cant take seriously.
     
    clutchdabear likes this.
  5. Dobbizzle

    Dobbizzle Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2021
    Messages:
    6,340
    Likes Received:
    9,543
    I said put it down, not send me a self portrait :p
     
  6. J.R.

    J.R. Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2008
    Messages:
    113,900
    Likes Received:
    175,211
    Magic Johnson: 6’9 | 215 lbs
    Luka Doncic: 6’7 | 230 lbs
    James Harden: 6’5 | 220 lbs
    Oscar Robertson: 6’5 | 205 lbs
    Nate McMillan: 6’5 | 195 lbs
    Micheal Ray Richardson: 6’5 | 189 lbs
    Jason Kidd: 6’4 | 205 lbs
    Jrue Holiday: 6’4 | 205 lbs
    Walt Frazier: 6’4 | 200 lbs
    Richie Guerin: 6’4 | 195 lbs
    Goran Dragic: 6’4 | 190 lbs
    Glenn Rivers: 6’4 | 185 lbs
    Derek Harper: 6’4 | 185 lbs
    Dennis Johnson: 6’4 | 185 lbs
    Alvin Robertson: 6’4 | 185 lbs
    Gary Payton: 6’4 | 180 lbs
    Baron Davis: 6’3 | 209 lbs
    Chauncey Billups: 6’3 | 202 lbs
    Andre Miller: 6’3 | 200 lbs
    Jose Calderon: 6’3 | 200 lbs
    Jarrett Jack: 6’3 | 200 lbs
    Steve Nash: 6’3 | 195 lbs
    Terry Porter: 6’3 | 195 lbs
    Jeff Teague: 6’3 | 195 lbs
    Steve Francis: 6’3 | 195 lbs
    D’Angelo Russell: 6’3 | 193 lbs
    Joe Dumars: 6’3 | 190 lbs
    Jo Jo White: 6’3 | 190 lbs
    Eric Snow: 6’3 | 190 lbs
    Sam Cassell: 6’3 | 185 lbs
    Earl Monroe: 6’3 | 185 lbs
    Dave Bing: 6’3 | 180 lbs
    Brad Davis: 6’3 | 180 lbs
    Randy Smith: 6’3 | 180 lbs
    Jerry West: 6’3 | 175 lbs
    John Lucas: 6’3 | 175 lbs
    Rod Strickland: 6’3 | 175 lbs
    Steve Blake: 6’3 | 172 lbs
    Kenny Smith: 6’3 | 170 lbs
    Sleepy Floyd: 6’3 | 170 lbs
    Fat Lever: 6’3 | 170 lbs
    John Wall: 6’2.75 | 195.6 lbs
    Kirk Hinrich: 6’2.75 | 186 lbs
    Gilbert Arenas: 6’2.25 | 199 lbs
    Russell Westbrook: 6’2.25 | 192 lbs
    Ricky Rubio: 6’2 | 190 lbs
    Tony Parker: 6’2 | 185 lbs
    Jason Terry: 6’2 | 185 lbs
    Stephen Curry: 6’2 | 181 lbs
    Stephon Marbury: 6’2 | 180 lbs
    Gus Williams: 6’2 | 175 lbs
    Hal Greer: 6’2 | 175 lbs
    Lou Williams: 6’2 | 175 lbs
    Norm Nixon: 6’2 | 170 lbs
    De’Aaron Fox: 6’2 | 169.6 lbs
    Deron Williams: 6’1.75 | 202.4 lbs
    Kyrie Irving: 6’1.75 | 191 lbs
    Damian Lillard: 6’1.75 | 188.8 lbs
    Reed Sheppard: 6’1.75 | 181.6 lbs
    Derrick Rose: 6’1.5 | 196 lbs
    Donovan Mitchell: 6’1.25 | 211.4 lbs
    Raymond Felton: 6’1 | 205 lbs
    Derek Fisher: 6’1 | 200 lbs
    Jalen Brunson: 6’1 | 198.4 lbs
    Mo Williams: 6’1 | 198 lbs
    Jason Williams: 6’1 | 190 lbs
    Mike Bibby: 6’1 | 190 lbs
    TJ McConnell: 6’1 | 190 lbs
    Larry Costello: 6’1 | 186 lbs
    Isiah Thomas: 6’1 | 180 lbs
    Mark Jackson: 6’1 | 180 lbs
    Rajon Rondo: 6’1 | 180 lbs
    Maurice Cheeks: 6’1 | 180 lbs
    Lenny Wilkens: 6’1 | 180 lbs
    Kevin Johnson: 6’1 | 180 lbs
    Bob Cousy: 6’1 | 175 lbs
    Norm Van Lier: 6’1 | 173 lbs
    John Stockton: 6’1 | 170 lbs
    Nick Van Exel: 6’1 | 170 lbs
    Gail Goodrich: 6’1 | 170 lbs
    Brandon Jennings: 6’1 | 170 lbs
    Kenny Anderson: 6’1 | 168 lbs
    Tiny Archibald: 6’1 | 150 lbs
    Trae Young: 6’0.5 | 177.8 lbs
    Kyle Lowry: 6’0 | 196 lbs
    Jameer Nelson: 6’0 | 190 lbs
    Guy Rodgers: 6’0 | 185 lbs
    Dick McGuire: 6’0 | 180 lbs
    Mookie Blaylock: 6’0 | 180 lbs
    Greg Anthony: 6’0 | 176 lbs
    Tim Hardaway: 6’0 | 175 lbs
    Mark Price: 6’0 | 170 lbs
    Rickey Green: 6’0 | 170 lbs
    Kevin Porter: 6’0 | 170 lbs (no, not him)
    Allen Iverson: 6’0 | 165 lbs
    Chris Paul: 5’11.75 | 178 lbs
    Kemba Walker: 5’11.5 | 184 lbs
    Ty Lawson: 5’11.25 | 196.6 lbs
    Terrell Brandon: 5’11 | 180 lbs
    Mike Conley: 5’11 | 175 lbs
    JJ Barea: 5’10 | 180 lbs
    Avery Johnson: 5’10 | 175 lbs
    Brevin Knight: 5’10 | 173 lbs
    Damon Stoudamire: 5’10 | 171 lbs
    Slater Martin: 5’10 | 170 lbs
    Michael Adams: 5’10 | 162 lbs
    Calvin Murphy: 5’9 | 165 lbs
    Isaiah Thomas: 5’8.75 | 186 lbs
    Spud Webb: 5’6 | 133 lbs
    Muggsy Bogues: 5’3 | 136 lbs
     
  7. Nook

    Nook Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Messages:
    59,708
    Likes Received:
    132,013
    He isn't an elite defender. I don't know anyone that thinks that he is going to be as good a defender as someone like Jrue Holiday.

    His weakness is as a defender at the point of attack. He wasn't terrible in college, still better than guys like Dillingham. Still, there is some concern that he will never be better than adequate at POA defense.

    He is very good as a team defender and an off-ball defender. There is little concern about him being an above average team/off ball defender.

    He gets a lot of steals and blocks because he has exceptional hands and very good athleticism.

    So his defense is a mixed bag - but it isn't "bad", and he is better than most of the guards in this draft.


    He doesn't make flashy passes, but he doesn't need to. He makes the right pass at the right time. He had a very high assist rate, and his assist to turnover rate is excellent. As an actual passer, he is very solid.

    If there is any criticism, it is that he needs to get better at dealing with swarming defenses - but he was 18 years old.


    Who are all these people expecting Reed Sheppard to become LBJ or MJ - because I don't see them.


    Dude - he shot 53% on nearly 5 3's a game - he shot 54% on mid-range shots - he shot nearly 60% at the rim. He shot in the mid 80's from the free throw line as a 19-year-old.

    As for Steph Curry - he is the best shooter in history.... and FWIW as a freshman, at a smaller school, he shot 41% from 3.

    Does that mean Reed will be a better shooter? No - but questioning Reed Sheppard's shooting is pretty absurd.

    He literally shot an elite percentage everywhere on the court.

    Again - I don't get where you see all of these people claiming that he is a transcendent player..... they don't exist.
     
    Little Bit, Easy, joshuaao and 9 others like this.
  8. Verbal Christ

    Verbal Christ Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2009
    Messages:
    19,925
    Likes Received:
    31,269
    Connective passer for Reed Sheppard sounds accurate.
     
    Rudyc281 likes this.
  9. Hemingway

    Hemingway Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2016
    Messages:
    10,631
    Likes Received:
    13,844
    At least one, BTG. He makes it seem like there are dozens though with the hundreds of posts only outweighed by the negative Jalen posts.
     
    Nook likes this.
  10. Nook

    Nook Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Messages:
    59,708
    Likes Received:
    132,013
    Dillingham has great juke and quickness, he will be a good to great scorer in the NBA. The question is on the defensive side of the ball and how good will he be as a passer. His most likely outcome is an excellent 6th man type player - but the upside is there for him to do more.
     
    xtruroyaltyx and Rudyc281 like this.
  11. Nook

    Nook Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Messages:
    59,708
    Likes Received:
    132,013
    Sheppard is going to be short, and he is not ever going to have a good reach. However, I do think that he will eventually have a very strong lower half and he has a good center of gravity, so the weight issue doesn't bother me long term.
     
    Rudyc281 likes this.
  12. RC Cola

    RC Cola Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2002
    Messages:
    11,504
    Likes Received:
    1,347
    I've probably come close to calling him a PG savant, so I can clarify those thoughts if that helps at all (though I doubt it will given...reasons).

    I do think in his highest ceiling outcome (like 1 percent of outcomes), he's something approaching Nash (maybe Curry, but I see less of that) as an offensive player. Not quite Nash, but something like that. Maybe something between Mark Price and Nash? But yeah...sure...PG savant. For context, I suppose Sarr would be AD in his top 1 percent of outcomes, Clingan a better Gobert/Brook Lopez, Sengun is Jokic, Jalen is Booker, etc. Just throwing that out there in case people think this is unreasonable hype (1 percent outcomes usually are unreasonable hype).

    In his more realistic ceiling outcomes (maybe like 20%-30% of outcomes), he's closer to like a FVV on-ball. Maybe not quite as good of a playmaker (though arguably a better passer?). Probably wouldn't use the term PG savant, but a good PG for sure.

    In his median outcome, he's probably like a Derrick White (sorry, I know all guards are compared Derrick White, but can't think of a better example at the moment). Not good enough to be your primary creator, but a solid playmaker when needed and a solid connective passer.

    In his floor outcomes, he's probably like a DiVincenzo or something like that as a playmaker (DiVincenzo probably better overall maybe, don't really watch him a ton to fully make that call). Again, not good enough to be a primary creator, mostly just going to shoot/score, but still a solid high IQ player in your offense. Possibly more like Kennard if I'm underrating DiVincenzo's playmaking game.

    Pulling from Vecenie's comments on Reed (but from his strengths this time, which apparently is not showing up on CF for some reason):

    Anyway I'm probably in the minority in my thoughts about his high end PG potential, and I'll still willingly admit he's got big concerns on defense (which I've repeatedly gone over), and even if I'm unsure how much it will matter, he definitely has concerns as a primary creator when working without a ball screen. At the very least, he will need to be able to get by NBA bigs, which I do have some concerns about.
     
    xtruroyaltyx likes this.
  13. Nook

    Nook Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Messages:
    59,708
    Likes Received:
    132,013
    Brah.
     
  14. Hemingway

    Hemingway Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2016
    Messages:
    10,631
    Likes Received:
    13,844
    I think Dillingham might actually be the better choice for the Rockets, because of his superior handles. One thing that is troublesome on the offensive end, is that he is not a good finisher. In fact he is a poor finisher. If he can become a better passer that aspect will improve as well. His rookie year (if he gets minutes), he will get absolutely mauled in the lane so don’t expect those finishing numbers to be very good.
     
    Verbal Christ likes this.
  15. Verbal Christ

    Verbal Christ Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2009
    Messages:
    19,925
    Likes Received:
    31,269
    Dillingham would be awesome. His ability to break down a defense, create for others via gravity, and get to the line gives me confidence that he can contribute even when his outside shot is not going down. Defensively is where he is in the crosshairs, but I think a good peripheral defense around him would help mitigate his shortcomings there while his body fills out and he gets accustomed to playing NBA defense. You cant teach the natural instinct to create off the bounce that he has. He reminds me of Kyrie.
     
  16. Nook

    Nook Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Messages:
    59,708
    Likes Received:
    132,013
    It is hard to say - but I am concerned about Dillingham defensively going forward.

    Reed Sheppard is a better passer than Dillingham, but Dillingham does have better handles and more wiggle.

    At this point I think that Sheppard is just the better prospect, but I can see a world where Dillingham is a high-level scorer.
     
    Rudyc281 and Bobbythegreat like this.
  17. RC Cola

    RC Cola Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2002
    Messages:
    11,504
    Likes Received:
    1,347
    I definitely see a world where Dillingham is able to just light up defenses. Could easily be a high level scorer in the league.

    I do think his defense is bad enough that it might not matter. Almost the opposite of something like Garuba (pretty good defense, but lack of offense keeps him off the floor). Luckily NBA probably caters more towards offense, so maybe he still has a good shot at having success.

    I'd personally just pass on Dillingham (especially at #3 with what his draft stock appears to be) given the various concerns, but I would not be surprised if he blew up in the NBA.
     
  18. Bobbythegreat

    Bobbythegreat Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2013
    Messages:
    68,482
    Likes Received:
    31,949
    I'm not saying anything different than most smart analysts are saying about Sheppard.

    I've tried to spell out for everyone how talking about his ceiling isn't suggesting those things are likely...a ceiling is a best possible outcome.

    I've spelled out how I think a more likely outcome is a better version of FVV.

    I get how this can be confusing for our low IQ friends though.
     
  19. rpr52121

    rpr52121 Sober Fan
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2006
    Messages:
    7,780
    Likes Received:
    3,260
    I feel like most people critiquing Sheppards defense point out the size and being target on switches.

    However, most teams have at least one smaller guard as starter, and nearly have one in the main rotation. Only a few run out consistent big line ups like Boston and Minn.

    Also, the Rockets already have to deal with Sengun's perimeter defensive limitations right now, and would be silly to utilize a pure-switch or switch heavy defensive scheme if he is going to be a major factor. In which case, the Rockets may be able to hide Sheppard a bit against those types of teams with an alternative approach.
     
    RC Cola likes this.
  20. Bobbythegreat

    Bobbythegreat Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2013
    Messages:
    68,482
    Likes Received:
    31,949
    Not only will Dillingham be a defensive liability, but he only shot 35% on NBA distance 3's so there's some question as to how well his shooting will translate.

    Also he's very much tiny SG rather than a PG. He's not a natural passer, his first instinct is to find his own shot and his second instinct is to take a shot himself even if it isn't there. I'm not sure how well that'll work for him at the NBA level.

    If it works, he'll be a bucket, if not he might struggle to find a role.
     
    Nook likes this.

Share This Page