1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Trade 3 for Portland's 7 and 14..........

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by Mad Cornbread, May 21, 2024.

  1. Hemingway

    Hemingway Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2016
    Messages:
    6,390
    Likes Received:
    8,457
    This. I’m sure the Spurs are carousing the league for a trade out of this draft unless Sarr somehow falls to them. No way they give up anything of significance to move up for him however.
     
  2. Hemingway

    Hemingway Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2016
    Messages:
    6,390
    Likes Received:
    8,457
    No way the Rockets want to pay first round money at no. 14. If they trade the no. 3 pick it will be out of this draft altogether.
     
    BasketballMind, saleem and theDude like this.
  3. ApacheWarrior

    ApacheWarrior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2017
    Messages:
    9,368
    Likes Received:
    12,457
    I would go for

    #7 Dalton Knecht or Edey

    #14 Devin Carter or Kel'el Ware

    But I don't think Portland has any interest in #3 pick.,
    except for maybe Reed Sheppard Superstar lol
     
    BenjaminChen likes this.
  4. ApacheWarrior

    ApacheWarrior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2017
    Messages:
    9,368
    Likes Received:
    12,457
  5. saleem

    saleem Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2001
    Messages:
    29,488
    Likes Received:
    13,604
    No, thanks to Brogdon etc.
     
    ApacheWarrior likes this.
  6. ApacheWarrior

    ApacheWarrior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2017
    Messages:
    9,368
    Likes Received:
    12,457
    Yeah, I don't know why Jackson G. asked for Brogdon?

    I think he said, Brogdon played for Udoka and knows the system. I believe Udoka brought him
    to the Celtics in the off-season; but then Udoka was lifted before the season started
    (would've been Udoka's 2nd season)

    Maybe Mazulla ran the same system? I'm of the belief, they would have finished further that
    year with Udoka. (Previous year in the NBA finals vs Warriors)
     
  7. Spacemoth

    Spacemoth Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2007
    Messages:
    9,852
    Likes Received:
    4,515
    Brogdon + 7 (Buzelis, Cody Williams, Jared McCain, or Knecht) could work.

    Or Caruso + 11 (Ja’Kobe Walter, Ware, Knecht).

    either way I’m really glad we got #3. It’s like we added a solid vet to our squad, and still get to pick in the range we were supposed to be at (#9) with that Brooklyn pick.
     
  8. Francis3422

    Francis3422 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2000
    Messages:
    8,118
    Likes Received:
    5,878
    Yuck on trading down for those packages. Take Sheppard or Risacher. We need the shooting.
     
  9. rocket43

    rocket43 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2009
    Messages:
    81
    Likes Received:
    53
    Why trade one good infant for 2 not as good infants on a team full of toddlers?
     
  10. wlekfjv923n

    wlekfjv923n Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2012
    Messages:
    565
    Likes Received:
    817
    Don't think the trade would make sense from both team's perspective. For Portland, nobody considers this draft super strong at the top so why give up additional first round pick to move up 4 spots? For Rockets, under normal circumstances, I'd say yes to that trade for the same reason (that it's a weaker draft) but Rockets already have a number of young promising talent so doesn't seem to work. If it's Portland's #7 this year and like their next year 1st round pick, I think Rockets would go for it.
     
    snowconeman22 likes this.
  11. Rockets34Legend

    Rockets34Legend Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2002
    Messages:
    20,994
    Likes Received:
    16,109
    Why...............................
     
  12. nejyh

    nejyh Contributing Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2001
    Messages:
    426
    Likes Received:
    40
    If Clingan is a consensus n°3, not really needed. You can flip him to where he is sorely needed and still have one of the top guys you want at 7 (Topic, Sheppard, Knecht, Dillingham, Williams, Salaun,...), and then add Zach Edey @14. At least he could be a really valuable backup for 7+ years, a matchup nightmare offensively and defensively, in a league with again so many dominating bigs.
    The guy wants it, and he comes from a background of growing practicing all of the major north American sports.
    Great shape... Very intriguing...
     
  13. sydmill

    sydmill Member

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2002
    Messages:
    2,185
    Likes Received:
    2,149
    The deal Id swing with Portland:

    #3 for #7, #34 & Rayan Rupert
    Portland selects Sarr/Risacher/Clingan at 3 by moving up for 2 SRPs.

    Rockets select Sheppard (7), Bona (34) & Payton Sandfort (44). Rupert, Sandfort and Bona spend most of the season at RGV but would all be nice, cost controlled depth for the next few seasons.
     
  14. thegary

    thegary Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2002
    Messages:
    10,351
    Likes Received:
    2,357
    Idiots, we’re not doing any of that. We pick or trade out.
     
  15. BimaThug

    BimaThug Resident Capologist
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 1999
    Messages:
    8,353
    Likes Received:
    4,859
    Threw this out on Twitter, but what about 3 for 7 plus the 2029 Milwaukee first rounder (unprotected)?
     
    Y2JT, MadMax94$ and Ming The King like this.
  16. thegary

    thegary Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2002
    Messages:
    10,351
    Likes Received:
    2,357
    Why???
     
  17. BimaThug

    BimaThug Resident Capologist
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 1999
    Messages:
    8,353
    Likes Received:
    4,859
    Because they might be able to get a similar caliber player at 7, plus a future unprotected first that will be a VERY valuable trade asset going forward for a star trade.
     
  18. Plowman

    Plowman Contributing Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 1999
    Messages:
    12,434
    Likes Received:
    13,423
    No. Not close to enough.
     
  19. thegary

    thegary Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2002
    Messages:
    10,351
    Likes Received:
    2,357
    I guess, but okc has been caught in the lurch. Sure we want to maintain flexibility, but not at the expense of the here and now.
     
  20. nejyh

    nejyh Contributing Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2001
    Messages:
    426
    Likes Received:
    40
    Probably more attractive to Portland and potentially more rewarding to the Rockets too.
    I'm in, though I would ask to sweeten it with 34 (swap with 44) where Chomche/Bona can be had.
     
    MadMax94$ likes this.

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now