Muslims and Christians….. Adding Muslims to the groups that support the GOP! Can’t wait to see those neo nazis and Muslims marching together against teh gayz
Abrahamic faiths are outdated and have a vapid sense of morality that is meaningless. Now go side with the Muslims ATW, the group of people for a decade on this message board you advocated against their migration patterns.
LGBT is playing a dangerous game here. This is the only issue that can unite the Christians, Jews, and Muslims together. And once they do, all hell will break lose on the LGBT asses.
I have always said that the strange "alliance" between leftists and Islamists doesn't make sense. Leftists HATE the Catholic church, but the average Muslim is much more "socially conservative" than the average Christian. Yet, leftists have been having a very strange double standard, looking the other way when it comes to Islam's intolerance, but shouting bloody murder towards all things even slightly socially conservative from Christians. The farther out leftists push their trans agenda, the harder it will be for them to keep up their "pro Islam charade". Leftists' heads are already exploding lol.
Leftist will always hedge whatever Christians support or reject, right or wrong. And Christians will do the same. Society should reject both side of these religious zealots.
To make clear where I stand: Contrary to religious conservatives, I think everyone should be free to live their lives the way they please That includes gay (and trans) people being allowed to marry other adults. That includes no discrimination against gay, lesbian, trans, asexual, whatever people Religions or countries which actively discriminate against or sanction these lifestyles are very wrong, in my opinion. Obviously, more so the harsher the attitudes towards and treatment of people who have minority sexual preferences. E.g. a religion teaching that people who live these lifestyles "go to hell" is a stupid religion. A country that sanctions homosexual behaviour with fines or even the death penalty is medieval, and wrong. However, people in Western societies, or anywhere, should not be FORCED to "celebrate" these lifestyles. Accepting them and being tolerant of them is one thing, but to be FORCED to "celebrate" their sexual preferences for an entire month, OR ELSE YOU WILL BE BRANDED A BIGOT AND A FASCIST is too much. I predict that the more wokies go over the top with trying to shove all this "PRIDE" stuff down people's throats, as in trying to forcefully re-educate the majority, the more people will get fed up with it. So this attempted forceful "re-education towards tolerance" actually breeds more intolerance, because the pendulum will swing back. That's regrettable. If an adult wants to change their appearance, including via chemical castration and/or genital mutilation, in order to appear as a member of the opposite of their actual biological sex, they should be allowed to do it. They should not be ridiculed or discriminated for their choices. They should also not expect to be celebrated for their choices. If asked to do so, people should try to accommodate trans people's wish to be addressed by the gender they attempted to modify their appearance towards. If people address someone by what they appear to be, without hurtful intent, and that happens to be the actual biological gender of the person being addressed, then that is not something to get shamed for. It's just pattern recognition, and despite efforts to pretend someone is not their biological sex, they will often still look and sound more like their biological sex. Except for extremely rare intersex cases, there are only two genders, male and female. If someone tells you there are 72 or whatever genders, they are a ****ing idiot. Pronouns are bullshit, especially "they". Except if someone is actually trans and politely asks the people they interact with to make an attempt to address them as the gender they try to pretend they are. Then one should make an effort to accommodate that person's gender dysphoria. But it's not something that should be enforceable in any way. After all, everyone is just pretending, to make the person in question feel better. Children should be left alone with all things sexual. That should be left to the parents, and only from an older age to some extent also the teachers. Chemical castration, puberty blockers, genital mutilation applied to children must be made illegal. Doctors who practice these things should lose their license and go to jail. Parents who do this to their children should be sanctioned as well. "Gender-affirming care" is a misleading misnomer. It's an attempt at changing the appearance of someone's gender, not affirming the gender. The biological sex cannot be changed. Children should not be FORCED to celebrate "Pride", just like adults should not be forced to do it, but even less so than adults. There is nothing inherently "better" that needs to be celebrated about some people choosing minority sexual preferences. There is also nothing inherently "worse" about it. It is what it is. Leave children alone with it. Draq queen readings in schools are absolutely inappropriate, they are an attempt at indoctrination of young children. Anyone who reads up on it can see that there is an ideological and sexualized twist to this, and children need to be protected from this. Parents who take their children to this or to "pride" events are woke idiots who have a false understanding of what tolerance means, and they are making themselves feel more virtuous at the expense of their children. A lot of gay people, and in fact I believe the majority of gay people, agree with this view. Summary: I believe that I am tolerant and accepting overall. Protecting children is the top priority. Parental rights are the next priority (but there cannot be a parental right to chemically castrate or mutilate a child - a child cannot consent to this, and a parent cannot take over that consent, because it potentially permanently deprives the child of the ability to procreate). Any adult should be allowed to live the way they please, without discrimination, and certainly without any legal or religious sanctions, as long as it does not involve a sexualization of or towards children. But nobody should be forced to celebrate the sexual choices these adults make. Being tolerant is good, but being forced to celebrate other people's sexual preferences is not.
Where did you copy and paste that from? 26 minutes from your last post on here and you come up with that in that amount of time? No one is forced to celebrate and no one believes this is about protecting the children, aside from other conservatives. You post way too much anti homosexual and transsexuals to be tolerant. You may think you are but your fellow posters do not. You are what you argue
well stated. I too will do my best to be tolerant like this but there’s also a line and the line simply stops at children…The amazing thing is a lot of gays will agree with that- A lot of gays want nothing to do with “pride”
No no no…. You define “stop at the children”. What does that mean? How does that work? @AroundTheWorld you can jump in as well. What does it mean? How would you go about “stopping at the children”?
