We're going to need a balanced approach at best because once the tools are out it's going to almost impossible to keep them from being used. It would be like keeping students from using the Wikipedia to do research. Yes the process of any automation has been removing a lot of the basic labor from humans and freeing them up to do more complicated tasks. The problem with stuff like this is that the "complicated" tasks are now also being done by AI. For example it's one thing to use spell and grammer checkers when writing an essay but it becomes greater when the structure and content of the essay is being written by an AI. This means we're outsourcing fundamental concepts of langauge and thought like sentence structure to an AI. This is where I worry about where AI art starts removing or at least greatly changing the craft of art.
It will be interesting to see how it helps or harms. I don't think we know what happens when we free ourselves from "complicated" tasks. Perhaps we have the ability to evolve (or simply, as I suspect, reallocation resources) to perform "more complicated" tasks. That could be a good thing overall... I think lol.
This is really a Brave New World with what might happen not just to art but really human thought in the next few decades. My hope is that there is will be an appreciation of human made art and there will still be a demand for things like actual painting and sculpture. I hope it will be like how there was a backlash towards mass produced fast food and beer through the Slow Food movement and microbrews.
I've played around with ChatGPT. Really good at regurgitating information, but lacks the ability to form an opinion. It will even tell you it's not built to make decision. It probably got a B on the Business school test because it offered the technically right comparisons to the questions but failed to actually produce a workable solution.
ChatGPT, like other language models, has the potential to perpetuate harmful biases and stereotypes present in the data it was trained on. Additionally, ChatGPT can be used to generate fake or misleading information, which can be used to spread disinformation or manipulate public opinion. It's important to be aware of these potential risks and use the technology responsibly. It's also crucial to have human oversight and fact-checking of the output generated by ChatGPT.
Yo, ChatGPT and other language models might be repeating some messed up biases and stereotypes from the data it learned from. And it can also spit out some fake or inaccurate info, which can be used to hoodwink people or sway public opinion. It's crucial to be mindful of these potential risks and use the technology responsibly. It's also important to have human oversight and fact-checking of the output generated by ChatGPT.
ChatGPT and other talking computers might say things that aren't nice or true because of what they learned from the past. And it can also make up fake stories that aren't true. It's important to be careful with these talking computers and use them in a good way. And it's also important to have people check and approve what ChatGPT says.
Chatgpt is a talkin comp but it say not always nice things or not true things cuz of what it learn before an it can make up pretend stories too we need to be careful and use it for good things and we need peeps to check and make sure what it say is true not bad.
What Humanity Adds https://lawliberty.org/what-humanity-adds/ excerpt: ChatGPT has become ubiquitous. My first faculty meeting this semester considered the problem of law students using the technology to provide answers to exam questions or writing papers. Two law professors have published an article showing that ChatGPT could already pass two parts of the bar exam (the torts and evidence sections). A company last week offered a million dollars for an attorney to wear a headset and repeat the Chat’s answers to questions at an oral argument at the Supreme Court. The last development is, to be sure, a marketing gimmick. No attorney would do so, even if it were legal, and ChatGPT is not yet ready for Supreme Court primetime. Nevertheless, the company with the gimmick is offering services in traffic court next month. And these are just a few of the developments in the single field of law. Because ChatGPT is being offered now as a free service, millions of people have already used it for both work and pleasure—far more than Google and Facebook in their initial periods. One enjoyable parlor game is to ask it to write in a favorite author’s style, like Hemingway, or explain matters under different constraints, like writing a sonnet in iambic pentameter explicating the deterrence theory of Thomas Schelling. The latter result was not bad, particularly considering its instantaneous formulation. *** Meaning for Man Beyond its alteration of work, the new intelligent machines are likely to challenge man’s self-image in more profound ways. That’s nothing new: science and technology have been transforming it for the last five hundred years. The triumph of heliocentrism dethroned man from the center of the universe. Evolution raised questions that undermined his image as a select creature in touch with the divine rather than just one of many intelligent apes. But still, the human brain that devised such scientific theories continued to set us apart. While Chat GPS itself is not making these discoveries, it will summarize them better than almost any of us can, and other advances in AI may soon be responsible for actual scientific discoveries. But in one area, man does retain an advantage—morality. Machines have not replaced our conscience and do not appear to be on the verge of doing so. For instance, ChatGPT did not blush when it wrote up an article with entirely false cites. A commitment to truth is part of our conscience. To be sure, intelligent machines can make a list of the costs and benefits of decisions, but the weights given to these costs and benefits will remain debatable, as will even the larger questions of the extent to which we should be consequentialist rather than deontological in our judgments. Immanuel Kant said that two things filled him with wonder: the starry heavens above and moral conscience within. And that latter sense of wonder remains intact from the current advances of AI. Recognizing our moral sense as our real addition to the value of the world may do wonders for society as well. While capitalism and other modern science create great wealth and alleviate poverty, they remain instrumental goods. And like any instrument, these systems—and AI—must be guided by individuals making moral decisions, deciding for themselves such matters as what should be sold in the market and what should be left to other forms of human interaction. The rise of AI may remind us that morality is the ultimate measure of man and could thus even become a force for social regeneration. more at the link
it just spits out stuff eh? @DaDakota Oh Clutchfans, the NBA community so grand, Where fans of the Rockets come together hand in hand. A place where discussions on games and stats reign, And all things Houston basketball, fans eagerly explain. And among the members, a name stands tall, DaDakota, with knowledge, insight, and all. An analyst, expert, and fan with a heart, His passion for the Rockets, a work of art. With stats and graphs, he breaks down the game, Analyzing players, performance, and the team's aim. His insights, insightful, and his words so wise, He's a valued member of Clutchfans, that's no disguise. So here's to Clutchfans and DaDakota too, May their love for Houston basketball continue to renew. A community where fans can come together and share, Their passion for the Rockets, a bond so rare.
Nothing to do with AI. Human implement filters. He can report to OpenAI. The filters don't think he's Hitler, so there's that.
