University Instructor Fired for Showing Islamic Art

I'll say it. She shouldn't be upset.

 

My position is simple. She was taking a university art history course with other students who mostly don’t share her views. She should have understood that the purpose of presenting this work of art was not to cause offense or to somehow elevate Muhammad to status of God. So, what is she upset about? Can she explain it? If not, then she shouldn’t be upset.

I understand that her emotional reaction is somewhat outside her control because of how she’s been conditioned. Having racist feelings may also be outside of someone’s immediate control. Doesn’t change my view that people shouldn’t have those feelings. And if they have them, they should use their reasoning faculties to decondition themselves from having them.

 

But I wasn’t arguing against her “right” to have her feelings or be a petulant jerk as a result of those feelings.

Some feelings are toxic and divisive in a diverse, pluralistic society. I would include in that feelings that lead to one thinking they are justified in censoring important historical works of art in an art history class.

I don’t agree with this notion that we must always validate or respect other people’s feelings, no matter where it leads them or what conflicts arise from them.

 

Or, put another way, what shouldn’t be happening in someone’s mind. The difference between what I’m saying and thought police is significant — I don’t think people should be punished for their inner thoughts. But it doesn’t follow that all inner thoughts are appropriate, or that none are inappropriate.

I guess you’re saying that we shouldn’t judge how another person views things internally, only what they do or say outwardly that can actually affect others. But one directly leads to the other. Bad beliefs (like artistic depictions of an important historical figure is an unconditional, egregious moral sin) can lead to outward harm. If “bad” beliefs mean anything, it means people should give them up (voluntarily, of course).

 

I agree, in general, that it's not meaningful or useful to argue that someone "shouldn't" do something that is beyond their control. I alluded to this earlier. To the extent we have an ability to regulate how we react emotionally to a situation, we should do so if such reactions are harmful (both to ourselves and others). I hope this student who complained reflects on the situation, hears the arguments from many sympathetic Muslim scholars who are explaining that this was not Islamophobic, and she arrives at a place where she realizes this was not something worth being upset about. Because it wasn't.

 

There is a lawsuit, and the University is now acknowledging that they shouldn't have said professor was being Islamophobic. Student's heart is still broken.

Art professor sues after firing over Prophet Muhammad images | AP News

Art professor sues after firing over Prophet Muhammad images
By MARGARET STAFFORD

ST. PAUL, Minn. (AP) — Attorneys for an adjunct art professor said Tuesday she is suing the Minnesota university that dismissed her after a Muslim student objected to depictions of the Prophet Muhammad in a global art course, while the university admitted to a “misstep” and plans to hold public conversations about academic freedom.

In her lawsuit, Erika López Prater alleges that Hamline University — a small, private school in St. Paul — subjected her to religious discrimination and defamation, and damaged her professional and personal reputation.

“Among other things, Hamline, through its administration, has referred to Dr. López Prater’s actions as ‘undeniably Islamophobic,’″ her attorneys said in a statement. “Comments like these, which have now been published in news stories around the globe, will follow Dr. López Prater throughout her career, potentially resulting in her inability to obtain a tenure track position at any institution of higher education.”

In Minnesota, a lawsuit can be started by serving a summons and a complaint to the party being sued. Attorneys for López Prater said the lawsuit was served to Hamline University on Tuesday and will soon be filed in court.

Hamline University President Fayneese Miller and Ellen Watters, the Board of Trustees chair, released a joint statement Tuesday saying recent “communications, articles and opinion pieces” have led the school to “review and re-examine our actions.”

“Like all organizations, sometimes we misstep,” the statement said. “In the interest of hearing from and supporting our Muslim students, language was used that does not reflect our sentiments on academic freedom. Based on all that we have learned, we have determined that our usage of the term ‘Islamophobic’ was therefore flawed.”

The statement did not address the lawsuit, but said the university strongly supports academic freedom, which should co-exist with support for students. The university plans to hold two public conversations in coming months, one on academic freedom and student care and another on academic freedom and religion.

Last October López Prater showed the 14th-century painting depicting the Prophet Muhammad in a lesson on Islamic art. For many Muslims, visual depictions of the Prophet Muhammad violate their faith, which López Prater knew.

According to the lawsuit, López Prater’s course syllabus included a note that students would view images of religious figures, including the Prophet Muhammad. The syllabus also included an offer to work with students uncomfortable with viewing those images.

She also warned the class immediately before showing the depiction of the Prophet Muhammad. She said in media interviews last week that her goal was to teach students about the “rich diversity” of attitudes toward such imagery.

López Prater has said she and the department chair were discussing her teaching a new course, but after the student’s complaint she was told “her services were no longer needed.”

Hamline’s president previously said the professor’s contract was not renewed following the fall semester.

The lawsuit alleges that instead of Hamline recognizing López Prater showed the images with a proper academic purpose, the university chose to impose the student’s religious view that no one should ever view images of the prophet on all other students and employees.

On Friday, the Council on American-Islamic Relations, a national civil rights organization for Muslims, disputed the belief that López Prater’s behavior was Islamophobic. The group said professors who analyze images of the Prophet Muhammad for academic purposes are not the same as “Islamophobes who show such images to cause offense.”

At a news conference last week organized by supporters of López Prater’s firing, the student who filed the complaint said she had never seen a depiction of the Prophet Muhammad until the October class.

“It just breaks my heart that I have to stand here to tell people that something is Islamophobic and something actually hurts all of us, not only me,” said Aram Wedatalla, president of Hamline’s Muslim Student Association.

The university said on Tuesday it has learned much about the complexity of displaying images of the Prophet Muhammad and understands differing opinions on the issue exist within the Muslim community.

“Higher education is about learning and growing. We have certainly learned and continue to grow as we generate new knowledge to share with all of our Hamline community,” the statement said.

​