I was sitting at a concert the other night, people watching before the show. Looking at some of the people (mostly women) who were very pretty but probably not much going on under the hood besides aesthetics, it struck me that there are probably just some people who don't have much to offer besides good physical genetics. I've always looked for more in women beyond looks which I admit are a prerequisite for me to at least get their foot in the door; brains, sense of humor, kindness, etc. But I also dated completely vapid, very attractive women who were essentially there for my pleasure and arm candy. When I was bored with them they just moved on to the next guy. What say you? Are these women (or men) just there to propagate the species?
Fixed your punctuation and grammar. Poor, non-linear response. Maybe schedule an appointment with the third grade too, champ.
Are u asking if there are women who offer nothing more than good looks? Is that not what the “dumb blonde” stereotype is essentially? Referring to them as “breeders” is weird
From what I understand, women who weigh 20 pounds more than prime Kathy Ireland are totally unacceptable. You can do better.
Looking fit and fabulous is as good and better a survival trait than doing math to put rockets into space. Idiocracy isn't just a meme. More like social entropy.
I'd say no, and that the vapid girls you've met may only appear that way to you because of their guardedness, the shallowness of the relationship between you, or maybe your own misogyny.
