There can be no other viewpoint when the evidence is overwhelming and people ignore it. 1. Trump sued 2 times for having sex with a 13 year old - FACT 2. Trump accused of assaulting more than 25 women - FACT 3. Trump found guilty of running a fake children's charity - FACT 4. Trump found guilty of running a fake university - FACT 5. Trump found guilty 2 times of money laundering in his casino - FACT 6. Trump impeached 2 times - protected by the GOP when evidence was against him - FACT 7. Trump Lied about having sex with a p*rn star - FACT 8. Trump mocked a handicapped reporter - FACT 9. Trump illegally enriched himself breaking the emoluments clause - FACT 10. Trump's campaign colluded with Russia during the 2016 election - FACT I mean the list goes on and on and on.......I am fine having a conservative vs liberal debate, but I am not ok with any debate where facts are completely ignored and character of a person elected President is not considered. DD
I'll let OS speak for himself. But I don't believe he denies a number of those on the list. I believe he accepts them. My take on his position is that he doesn't like Trump and agrees with most or all of the things you listed. He just feels that Trump's opponents go overboard and get over-dramatic in trying to go after him. That's my take, and he can tell me if I'm wrong.
because it depends on the "crimes." Lots of people speed on the nation's highways every day, which is a crime. But we would think it a foolish waste of resources for the FBI to go after the nation's speeders. And right now there isn't a single person here who knows the nature of the crimes Trump is being investigated for. So until that information is available, a lot of this discussion strains credulity. I believe that's why the poster you're responding to said "Do you honestly think something will come of this?"
That's not why he wrote that, it's because he genuinely believes Trump to be innocent. So the fact is you have the FBI going after an ex-President without revealing a ton of info. We know the FBI doesn't do this sort of thing lightly unless they have pretty good idea of some serious crimes being committed. Now, one side is saying, well, this could point to this or that - given Trump's long history of some pretty eyebrow raising things. While you see it as a "speeding ticket" many others see it as election fraud - the kind people get locked away for life for. On the other side you have people jumping to his defense - again without any knowledge of what he has done - saying it's a witchhunt, saying nothing will come off it, that's it's just more TDS. Personally, to me it's pretty clear which side is looking at this realistically and which side is not.
Althouse: https://althouse.blogspot.com/2022/08/i-find-myself-in-wall-street-journal.html August 11, 2022 I find myself in The Wall Street Journal. Here's the entire blog post. Posted by Ann Althouse at 8:38 AM
i can only surmise that the insurrectionist doesn't people to know that after he was no longer the POTUS---having been fired by the American voters--- citizen Trump had removed classified documents from the WH to Mar A Lago as reported by Newsweek, Is there a mole at Mar-a-Lago? That’s certainly the suggestion from two senior government officials who revealed to Newsweek that a “confidential human source” was able to tell the FBI which classified documents Donald Trump still had at Mar-a-Lago and where the documents were. Officials who executed the search warrant later removed some 10-15 boxes of documents Monday, some of which were in Trump’s safe.
