1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Should the Rockets seriously explore trading UP to #4?

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by HealthyHamstring, Jun 3, 2022.

  1. ApacheWarrior

    ApacheWarrior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2017
    Messages:
    10,347
    Likes Received:
    13,301
    Exactly..... Garuba was a big name last draft
    Player X, Y, Z this year
    Player Wembanyama, Dillion Mitchell, Cam Whitmore, Dereck Lively next year

    Why is Garuba a bust and the others so highly regarded in your mind?

    Because a scout said Banchero or Chet is better than any player from last year?
    Who is saying that? I'm hearing the opposite, this year's crop is lesser than last year.

    Or, are they the flavor of the month in your eyes. Rookies take 3 to 4 years
    to develop. I haven't given up on Garuba..... BobbythenotsoGreat has.

    I haven't.
     
    Deckard, saleem, King1 and 1 other person like this.
  2. Milos

    Milos Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2001
    Messages:
    1,237
    Likes Received:
    1,140
    It's team-building vs asset collecting
    I'm with you, firmly on the team building plan

    We just saw a perfect example of this play out in the worst possible way on the league's worst joke of a franchise

    The Kings have repeatedly stuck to their own BPA philosophy for years, collecting nothing but lottery misfits since adding Buddy Hield in the Boogie trade

    The came Fox
    Then Halliburton
    Then last year it was Davion Mitchell

    The only exception was Bagley at #2, when they somehow passed on 2 of the best young playmakers in the NBA

    All the sudden at the deadline last year they realized this collection of ball-dominant players was a terrible fit together as a team, and moved their best young backcourt player for some size and other skills in Sabonis to better balance the team

    I like Davion a lot, but it was incredibly shortsighted to take him at #9 considering the roster they already had

    Would you rather have Sengun, Halliburton and Hield today, or Davion and Sabonis?
    And they still have a glaring lack of perimeter D and shooters to help Barnes on the wing

    I do not want to be the Kings
    I want to draft with vision to find players that complement and enhance our talented young core
     
    saleem and theDude like this.
  3. Bobbythegreat

    Bobbythegreat Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2013
    Messages:
    68,482
    Likes Received:
    31,949
    Oh, are you under the delusion that Sengun is a poor defender? LOL, that's embarrassing.

    I didn't actively avoid talking about the defense, I just brought other things up.

    I've heard the talk about lateral quickness from Banchero....but I haven't really seen it. For the most part, I've seen him resting on that end of the ball after carrying on offense. It causes him to be out of position and sometimes lose his man. So it's not so much an athleticism or quickness problem, it's more that he needs to focus more on that side of the ball.....something he'd be able to do on a team where he wouldn't be asked to carry the whole team all the time. I know, I know, you want EVERYONE on the team to be a guard, so the idea of actually playing a PF is a foreign concept, but for a PF, his athleticism and lateral quickness is more than sufficient.

    You seem to base 100% of your defense analysis on centers getting switched out to the perimeter on guards.....and sure, that's in theory something that could happen, but if you aren't going super small, they'd have another player to challenge them at the rim. Also, you fail to see what happens to micro-ball teams when they face teams with ANY size. Ivey can ONLY defend the 1......and he's not very good at even that. If he gets switched on to basically anyone else, he's getting burned. What's Ivey going to do if he gets switched on Banchero? Sengun? Green? KPJ? Basically anyone? How is the team going to get ANY rebounds with your micro-ball nonsense?

    So yeah, in your scenario Ivey blows by Banchero who gets stuck out on the perimeter....then he runs into Sengun or KJ Martin and gets blocked because he lacks PG skills so he just forces something up.
     
  4. peleincubus

    peleincubus Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2002
    Messages:
    26,717
    Likes Received:
    14,997
    Shaedon Sharpe is the pick and you guys are wasting your time.
     
    ApacheWarrior likes this.
  5. ApacheWarrior

    ApacheWarrior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2017
    Messages:
    10,347
    Likes Received:
    13,301
    You have me confused with someone else when you say super small.

    I have the Rockets this upcoming season with:
    Ivey-Green-Porter-Wood-Sengun....JC/Mathews/Kenyon/Eason/Garuba.
    Next Season:
    Ivey-Green-Dillion Mitchell (6'7")-Eason (6'8")-Sengun (6'9")....where is the small ball?

    Maybe even Wembanyama if we get lucky!?! Where is the Small Ball there?
    ____________
    I'm just not as impressed with Banchero as you.

    Banchero: 17.2 pts....0.9 Blks...33.8% (3P%)....3.3 (3PA)...
    Ivey:..........17.3 pts....0.6 Blks...35.8% (3P%)....5.0 (3PA)...
    So Ivey shoots a better 3P% and with more attempts per game....Ivey is the
    bad shooter?

    Banchero: 2.7 Blk%....1.9 Stl%...17.5 Ast%...13.3 TOV%...
    Ivey:..........2.0 Blk%.....1.7 Stl%...19.2 Ast%...14.8 TOV%...
    So Paolo was the better Blk% this year.....but Ivey was 3.8 Blk% the previous yr.
    Ivey was greater assist guy
    Ivey was a guard, thus the higher TOV%.....who is the ball dominant player?

    Banchero: 27.5 USG%.... .557 TS%.... .520 eFG%...13.2 TRB%...
    Ivey:..........28.7 USG%..... .579 TS%.... .533 eFG%....9.3 TRB%...
    USG% is about the same so I don't see issue with one but not the other
    as ball dominant player.
    The poor shooter (Ivey) had a higher eFG% and TS%.
    And the Guard Ivey was almost as high as Banchero in Reb%.
    Jaylen Brown was 10.8 TRB% in college......so I'm not worried about the
    rebound battle if the Celtics aren't.

    Jaylen Brown (college): 15.3 ast%....17.9 TOV%...31.4 USG%...2.2 Blk%...
    1.7 Stl%... .518 TS%

    Banchero per-40 minutes: 20.9 pts...1.1 Blks...1.3 stls...2.9 TOV...9.5 TRB
    Ivey per 40-minutes:..........22.0 pts....0.7 Blks...1.2 stls...3.3 TOV...6.2 TRB.
    ______________________
    Summary: so no I don't share the same worries as you.
    Ivey plays like a wing and has long enough arms to play as such.
    Banchero is a big but doesn't play big. I need to get bigs to help
    the team defend the rim and get more rebounds with either one
    I pick. I'm going with the guard now.....#17 a defensive big.
    Future drafts.....defensive bigs as well. SF to replace Porter
    if he does not work out? Dillion Mitchell or Cam Whitmore will
    do just fine. So nope, no small ball here. I'm just setting up our
    Back Court to kick @## and chew bubblegum for the next 10 years.

    Ivey
    https://www.sports-reference.com/cbb/players/jaden-ivey-1.html
    Banchero
    https://www.sports-reference.com/cbb/players/paolo-banchero-1.html

    I give you the last word
     
    #245 ApacheWarrior, Jun 11, 2022
    Last edited: Jun 11, 2022
    King1, Chamillionaire and peleincubus like this.
  6. peleincubus

    peleincubus Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2002
    Messages:
    26,717
    Likes Received:
    14,997
    One plan could be if they actually think Ivey and Green would work is to have a really high pick again next season. Because defense will continue to be a issue. Then spam defensive wings forward through the draft and FA then you that backcourt which could work or not (I have NO idea) would be dynamic as hell I know that haha
     
    Clutch City1993 and fattz like this.
  7. fattz

    fattz Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2009
    Messages:
    5,620
    Likes Received:
    5,365
    Or some of the development from Garuba and #17 starts to pay off as they mature. We all saw how just a super active Bruno Fernando made a big difference in his limited playing time. It will not take a lot because not very position has to be a super star just accountable.
     
    peleincubus likes this.
  8. ApacheWarrior

    ApacheWarrior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2017
    Messages:
    10,347
    Likes Received:
    13,301
    Oh no.....ok I'll take Banchero. Geez
     
    peleincubus likes this.
  9. JayZ750

    JayZ750 Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2000
    Messages:
    25,432
    Likes Received:
    13,390
    I dont think Player A vs Player B comparisons are as useful in college. Consider Ivey and Banchero were in completely different conferences, playing VERY different schedules (I’m not sure if they had even a single common opponent)… and in this particular case play completely different positions.

    Booker was a backup in college. Scottie Barnes was a backup in college.

    moreover I’m not quite as bit on the age thing as some but do find it significant nonetheless. Compare Iveys freshman season with Paolo’s in the same way and see what happens.

    if the Rockets can trade up to #4 without giving up the #3 or next years first then I’m for it. I’ll take Ivey AND one of the forwards. But I find that incredibly unlikely. And that being the case if someone they want isn’t there at 17 I’d rather they trade back or out for an additional future first, ideally for next year.
     
    ApacheWarrior likes this.
  10. ApacheWarrior

    ApacheWarrior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2017
    Messages:
    10,347
    Likes Received:
    13,301
    I agree, and Player A didn't have Mark Williams covering his back and AJ Griffin
    and Wendell Moore flanking him.

    But stats are a baseline to go by or no stats would be used ever.

    I'm showing the 6'4" guy can almost match the 6'10" guy almost point for
    point, almost Assist for Assist, Almost Block for Block, etc, etc. To me it's
    a red flag that Banchero didn't have more rebounds or more blocks with Mark
    Williams making everyone double clinch their B- cheeks near the rim.

    Plus Porter isn't gven enough credit around here for the defense he
    played at the end of the season.

    Porter Jr defensive plays. Watch him vs SF's


    He plays like a SF (rebs/blocks)....so what's the problem?
     
    #250 ApacheWarrior, Jun 11, 2022
    Last edited: Jun 11, 2022
    saleem likes this.
  11. JayZ750

    JayZ750 Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2000
    Messages:
    25,432
    Likes Received:
    13,390
    Again… Scottie Barnes came off the bench and went on to win ROY. Barnes had a 9.3% total rebound % rate in college. A good 30% lower than Bancheros. He went on to average 7.5 boards a game as a rookie this year.

    Is it helpful to Banchero that he played on Duke with Williams and solid teams? Or as it neutral or even hurtful? Did it help or hurt Jabari that Walker was an even better college center defender? Did it help or hurt Chet that the offense was so centered around Timme?

    honestly… who knows.

    I just know I do t put a ton of stock in that Paolo be Ivey stat comparison you did a few posts back. Luke Garza probably would blow Paolo away in the same stat comparison looking at his last year of college. Doesn’t mean much of anything. By the same token Paolo’s stats comp favorably to Tatums freshman season. Also may not mean much of anything.

    Personally I’m not a huge Ivey fan. I see insane athleticism and solid but not insane skill in a combo guard package. I’m biased cause I really hate combo guards. DWade aside I just don’t see lots of examples where it works amazingly. I mean they have value but it’s rare to see HOF level value. More often it’s Eric Gordon level value. If Ivey was a near visionary or even above average passer and could clearly play the point I’d put him as a top pick potential. I don’t see that now or ever really. If he was a generational shooter same thing but I don’t see that.

    are you far off base by saying the other guys have stuff to work on too? No of course not. But Chet has generational length and defense with insane efficiency, Jabari has generational shooting and Paolo … TO ME … has generational point forward skills in an insane frame.

    again consider that in what is widely regarded as a stacked draft the ROY was Barnes. Now I dont agree with that choice but it’s also certainly not crazy. It’s defensible. This is apparently a weak draft. But whether on paper, whether by the eye test or whatever… Paolo is a very similar player except better coming out of college except arguably defense. This is a comp staring in everyone’s face that I don’t get why it hasn’t been brought up. If you moved Barnes to this draft I think he’s coming in 4th or 5th. I get that’s somewhat the uniqueness of Barnes and the situation at Florida State where that coach just likes to play some of these heralded freshman off the bench (see Patrick Williams) … but also just the eye test …. Very few would, not knowing how Barnes turns out in the nba … have watched Paolo at Duke and Barnes at FlState and have Barnes ahead of Paolo. Barnes also benefitted from the PERFECT landing spot… but I also just think todays nba is just so well suited for this type of player if skilled, dedicated, coachable with high bball iq.

    much of the above analysis is contextual. Stats are definitely involved but you have to have just have watched a lot of all of it to form a thesis and then so much depends on the mentality of the player beyond pure skill.

    Sorry, long post but best way I can put it. I’ll probably be wrong, Paolo will be Josh Smith and Ivey becomes a Westbrook/Wade hybrid hall of famer lol
     
    xtruroyaltyx and raining threes like this.
  12. raining threes

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2008
    Messages:
    18,459
    Likes Received:
    13,312
    My way is having enough size to not get dominated on the boards and provide weakside shot blocking. I mean the Celtics have Williams and Horford, the Warriors have Looney and Wiggins along with Draymond. In other words they dont hve a front line with 6'4 PF's.

    To be fair I'm not a fan of Ivey's game and would pick several guys ahead of him including Murray, Daniels etc...
     
    #252 raining threes, Jun 11, 2022
    Last edited: Jun 11, 2022
  13. ApacheWarrior

    ApacheWarrior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2017
    Messages:
    10,347
    Likes Received:
    13,301
    You are entitled to your opinion and I'm entitled to mine

    You meet the narrative you wish to draw and I come to the conclusion I come to.

    I put my record against anyone here at judging talent.
     
    JayZ750 likes this.
  14. raining threes

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2008
    Messages:
    18,459
    Likes Received:
    13,312
    If I was in Stone's shoes, I'm picking whoever falls to #3. Let's say Banchero.

    Then I'm looking to trade Wood plus #17 if I have to draft Eason with the Hornets pick. I'm also looking to trade Gordon and Tate for Conley and I'm signing Mitchell Robinson or Nurcic in FA.

    Eason
    Banchero
    Robinson
    Green
    Conley
    KPJ
    Sengun
    Garuba
    Nwaba
    Matthews
    Nix
    Fernando

    This is the type of lineup that's versatile enough to play big or small and very young and athletic.
     
    #254 raining threes, Jun 11, 2022
    Last edited: Jun 11, 2022
  15. ApacheWarrior

    ApacheWarrior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2017
    Messages:
    10,347
    Likes Received:
    13,301
    I've already commented many tims on how I see the NBA moving
    from 6'3"-ish guards to 6'9" and above players.

    The under 6'3" players better be able to shoot like Trae Young or Steph Curry
    or leap like Ja Mora t or Ivey.

    The above 6'9" player better be mobile and athletic swift of foot to
    protect the interior and perimeter.

    Banchero and Sengun don't meet both criteria's imo.

    But if you put enough all stars around them.....sure you can win a
    championship.
    ------------
    you are seeing me advocate for the two elite athletes a combo guards
    in Jalen Green and Ivey. Not much different from Marcus Smart since he
    was moved to PG after the trade deadline (and excellent winning % there after)
    and
    Derrick White....also a combo guard type.
    Jaylen Brown....6'6" to 6'7". I'm saying Kevin Porter Jr equally plays as tall.
    Jalen Green is 6'5" to 6'6"-ish. Have you seen him jump? Front taller men in the post?

    Steph Curry
    Jordan Poole (listed as 6'4" in some sites)

    Bucks used Jrue Holiday to help win last season.
    --------------

    Do the Rockets have a defensive presence to win it all......NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    But I never said we (Rockets) are going to win the championship this season. Banchero
    doesn't get us there either!!!!!

    Am I saying the pairing of Jalen Green s the BEGINNINGGGGGGGGGGGGGG OF THAT....YESSSSS!

    [ I know I need to put all this in my signature because I've covered this a million times this off season ]

    Where have you been the last 2 months?

    So drafting
    Mark Williams (7'0")
    Tari Eason (6'8")
    Sochan (6'9")
    EJ Liddell (6'7" with 6'11.25" wingspan similar to Draymond Green in size and height)
    others

    Next season
    Dillion Mitchell (6'7")
    Cameron Whitmore (6'7")
    Kel'el Ware (6'11")
    Dereck Lively (7'1")
    Wembanyama (7'2") ?? gave to win the lottery though

    Goes along towards completing the rebuild. Plus the Rockets have bizillion dollars
    as Wall and Eric Gordon contracts come off the books. Able to go after a 27 y/o
    Myles Turner.

    So NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO, drafting Ivey does not complete the rebuild. Merely
    competes the stockpile of guards for the next 10 years with the stable of:
    Ivey
    Green

    Porter (? Beyond this season as he is a restricted free agent?)
    Josh Christopher
    Mathews

    Nix/Queen become expendable if Ivey is drafted imo. Get what value you can for them.

    _______________________
    Many teams are going multiple Combo Guards in 3-guard lineups. That's winning basketball now
    (Check playoffs) and soon to be the norm. Looney is 6'9" and doesn't shoot 3's. Robert Williams
    is 6'8" and doesn't shoot 3's......but what do they have in common. Length and athleticism.
     
    saleem, King1 and raining threes like this.
  16. Chamillionaire

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Messages:
    5,792
    Likes Received:
    2,527
    I could definitely see Ivey being the pick. Stone has repeatedly said great players make it work. All 3 guys can play off ball and athletic enough that they could become good defenders.
     
  17. Easy

    Easy Boban Only Fan
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2002
    Messages:
    38,080
    Likes Received:
    29,501
    "Great players make it work." Sounds like Morey's line.
     
    saleem and Chamillionaire like this.
  18. saleem

    saleem Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2001
    Messages:
    30,217
    Likes Received:
    14,657
    Kevin does gamble a bit, but his defensive IQ is good. He's at least 6'5. He's an important and underrated player for us.
     
  19. saleem

    saleem Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2001
    Messages:
    30,217
    Likes Received:
    14,657
    @ApacheWarrior

    Stone should offer JC, KMJ or Tate, the 17th pick and Milwaukee 's 2023 rd for Sacramento 's 4th. I doubt it if it's enough, but they are the Kings after all. Throwing in Christopher made me uncomfortable and unhappy. Take a gamble on Ivey. Move KPJ to the 3. Select Paolo with the 3rd pick. Re-sign Bruno Fernando to a small contract.
     
  20. No Worries

    No Worries Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 1999
    Messages:
    32,752
    Likes Received:
    20,509
    I would much rather trade this year’s 17th pick for a next year projected mid first round pick … if the Rockets do not see someone they really like at 17.
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now