And they could have gotten gunned down by a mere handgun. Handguns easily cause the most deaths amongst all forms of firearms in this nation. So if she sincerely believed that banning types of weapons reduces American deaths, handguns would be what she would chose. They are easily concealable to where it's very easy to get close to your victim and gun them down unlike a ar-15. Gun violence is mostly a result of income inequality and the drug trade as a result of that income inequality.
I mean she does bring it up literally every new term since 1994. I guess this is something we will agree to disagree on. I just hear enough rhetoric from the proggressive isle to have a feeling of what they are more passionate about. Maybe my perception is wrong but from the proggressives I know in real life, on the internet and what proggressive polticians most concentrate their rhetoric on, it seems like gun regulation is near the bottom of their priorities. Ilhan Omar might be a an exception probably due to her being raised as a child outside the US and not understanding how deeply imbedded firearms culture is in this country.
Colleagues worry Dianne Feinstein is now mentally unfit to serve, citing recent interactions https://www.sfchronicle.com/politics/article/dianne-feinstein-senate-17079487.php
I could care less about senior aging disabilities, but I do care about being entirely ineffective as a Senator. Her, Chuck Grassley, Lahey, etc. are so ineffective and obviously are only there because of the status or whatever perks come with living out your golden years as a key vote in our republic. She should have been primaried and replaced by a hungry and effective California politician years ago.
