1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Hypothetical War - NATO vs Russia - who wins?

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by DaDakota, Feb 25, 2022.

?

Who would win NATO or Russia

  1. NATO

    18 vote(s)
    94.7%
  2. Russia

    1 vote(s)
    5.3%
  1. DaDakota

    DaDakota If you want to know, just ask!

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 1999
    Messages:
    124,134
    Likes Received:
    33,020
    No one wants war, but if it is forced upon you.....you can't lay down.....you have to fight.

    DD
     
    Xopher likes this.
  2. Surfguy

    Surfguy Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 1999
    Messages:
    23,199
    Likes Received:
    11,531
    "The only winning move is not to play. How about a nice game of chess?"

    [​IMG]
     
    Plowman and marks0223 like this.
  3. KingCheetah

    KingCheetah Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2002
    Messages:
    56,337
    Likes Received:
    48,238
    @glynch
     
  4. Deckard

    Deckard Blade Runner
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2002
    Messages:
    56,814
    Likes Received:
    39,126
    If it remained a conventional war and China didn't participate, NATO would win. I don't have any doubt about that. The results would be horrific for all involved, however. Such a war, until a couple of days ago, seemed so remote as to be consigned to the realm of video games and a particular genre of fiction.

    No longer. Vladimir Putin has committed the act of a madman against a very large European country of about 44 million, a country the size of France. The peace of 75 years, tenuous at times, but free of a declared war of conquest by one state against another, has been shattered.
     
    FranchiseBlade likes this.
  5. Dairy Ashford

    Dairy Ashford Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    14,507
    Likes Received:
    1,833
    NATO countries would probably need the same kind of build-up and revamping that Allies needed during WWII. Russian leaders have purged and starved more of their own in peacetime than they would lose in war, and would balance those books executing civilian deserters. Putin is like Tom Cruise's cousin In the Bedroom, so is the Champions League Tom Wilkinson outside a cabin in the woods, or Nick Stahl's head goulash?
     
  6. Buck Turgidson

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2002
    Messages:
    86,067
    Likes Received:
    84,539
    Can we please lock/stop this stupid, stupid thread? Please?

    This serves no purpose at all.
     
    Ubiquitin and VooDooPope like this.
  7. riko

    riko Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2014
    Messages:
    9,634
    Likes Received:
    16,083
    The Russians are struggling with Ukraine. That should be enough to tell you how poorly trained their army is. The problem is if it was a conventional war it would be a bloodbath because NATO alliance would win easily but Russia has the largest nuclear arsenal in the world so it would be a nuclear holocaust that would end up destroying the entire European continent
     
  8. glynch

    glynch Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2000
    Messages:
    17,790
    Likes Received:
    3,395
    Sadly some folks like money and war makes them money so they like war as long as they are not in danger.

    Also in many cases policies that those who REALLY do not want war can see have a huge possibility of war being "forced upon you" are recklessly pushed. For example making NATO expansion to Ukraine non-negotiable while proclaiming you will not fight in Ukraine because, Thank God you REALLY do not want Nuclear War.
     
  9. Sweet Lou 4 2

    Sweet Lou 4 2 Contributing Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2007
    Messages:
    37,717
    Likes Received:
    18,918
    Would you be ok with let's say 8 random American cities being nuked in order to stand up to Russia?
     
  10. Xerobull

    Xerobull You son of a b!tch! I'm in!

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2003
    Messages:
    33,433
    Likes Received:
    31,025
    ...the children?
     
  11. mikol13

    mikol13 Protector of the Realm
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2009
    Messages:
    13,812
    Likes Received:
    27,226
    …..
     
    #31 mikol13, Mar 1, 2022
    Last edited: Mar 1, 2022
  12. real_egal

    real_egal Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2003
    Messages:
    4,430
    Likes Received:
    247
    USA wins.

    The biggest winner from any unstable and fighting continent is always USA.

    That’s why NATO has expanded eastbound 5 times, and at the same time Russia’s request to join NATO was turned down 3 times. If Europe is unified, UK will become almost obsolete and US wouldn’t be able to dictate the direction of Europe.

    Will Europe ever be unified? Not a chance. Even if Germany, France and Russia want to cut a deal, East European countries will manage to break that with US dollar support.
     
  13. Mathloom

    Mathloom Shameless Optimist
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2008
    Messages:
    18,380
    Likes Received:
    18,402
    Everyone dies, except the absolute richest maybe 5-10 million people. That's why they don't mind it as much as everyone else.
     
  14. DaDakota

    DaDakota If you want to know, just ask!

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 1999
    Messages:
    124,134
    Likes Received:
    33,020
    See I think turning Russia away from NATO was a bad move.......

    DD
     
  15. Major

    Major Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 1999
    Messages:
    41,428
    Likes Received:
    15,860
    So you think if NATO and Russia get into war, one side or the other is going to go start bombing all of Africa for ***** and giggles?
     
    justtxyank likes this.
  16. Mathloom

    Mathloom Shameless Optimist
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2008
    Messages:
    18,380
    Likes Received:
    18,402
    No, I just think it's human nature that a duality of militaries will form based on survival and they will believe they are opposites and people will believe their identity is defined by which of those sides they join. That would engulf much of the world in the fight. Everyone is interconnected, now more than any other large scale war.
     
  17. justtxyank

    justtxyank Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2005
    Messages:
    42,718
    Likes Received:
    39,368
    This is an impossible poll to answer.

    Define "wins"

    In a conventional ground/air/sea campaign, NATO would wipe the floor with Russia. The Russian army is not nearly strong enough in manpower, equipment, planes, etc. to counter the USA, let alone the combined NATO forces if we went to total war. NATO bombers would level Russian supply lines. Our drone tech and bomber tech would completely annihilate their defense capabilities. And since we were not desiring occupation of Russia (I assume) there would be no need to level cities and stuff like Russia wants to do.

    However, they could and likely WOULD retaliate quickly with nuclear weapons. There's no doubt in mind that if a NATO army was advancing on Russia, they would quickly act to deter the effort by dropping tactical nuclear weapons on NATO positions, with the threat of a nuclear strike on a civilian target in Europe right there as well.

    Maybe you get lucky and the Russian military overthrows Putin before a nuclear holocaust, but if not...if the Russian military decides to fight it out because "without Russia as a world power, who needs a world?" then they could absolutely devastate the West. Yeah they'd lose, but so would we.
     
    DaDakota likes this.
  18. justtxyank

    justtxyank Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2005
    Messages:
    42,718
    Likes Received:
    39,368
    Preposterous. Africa and South America would be largely untouched. Asia would depend entirely on whether China was stupid.
     
  19. justtxyank

    justtxyank Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2005
    Messages:
    42,718
    Likes Received:
    39,368
    Ukraine's admission to NATO being "non-negotiable" is a flat out lie. Diplomats already floated a 20 year promise on Ukrainian NATO membership being off the table. NATO has no desire to bring Ukraine into the fold and everyone knows it. NATO membership for Ukraine is an absolute fig leaf for an invasion that Putin has wanted for a decade.

    Nemtsov warned a decade ago that Putin wanted war with Ukraine and was trying to force it. Not because of NATO, but because he wanted Ukraine.
     
    FranchiseBlade likes this.
  20. tmoney1101

    tmoney1101 Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2009
    Messages:
    17,473
    Likes Received:
    21,823
    I think Putin would absolutely launch nukes before he’d cede even one inch of Russian soil to an invading force. The world just have to hope that someone close to him would put a bullet in the back of his head before that happens.
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now