1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

OSHA Fines Company $136,000 That Wouldn’t Let Employees And Customers Wear Masks

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by Andre0087, Apr 14, 2021.

  1. Andre0087

    Andre0087 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    8,256
    Likes Received:
    11,207
    The $136,000 fine is the largest COVID-related penalty to date from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration.

    The Occupational Safety and Health Administration has issued a $136,000 fine against a Massachusetts tax preparer that allegedly prohibited employees from wearing masks at work amid the coronavirus pandemic.

    The fine against Liberty Tax Service of Lynn marks the biggest penalty OSHA has levied related to COVID-19, an agency spokesperson confirmed. It is likely a sign of more aggressive enforcement of workplace safety now that the Biden administration is in charge.

    Galen Blanton, a regional administrator for OSHA in Boston, said in a statement that the owner of the tax service, Ariana Murrell-Rosario, demonstrated a “willful refusal to implement basic safeguards” to protect employees from the coronavirus.

    In a phone interview, Murrell-Rosario acknowledged that she did not allow employees to wear masks and forbade customers from wearing them as well. She said masks are a “deadly” health hazard and “should be banned out of this country.”

    The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends that people wear masks “anywhere they will be around other people” in order to slow the spread of COVID-19. The idea that the masks themselves make people sick has thrived in some corners of the internet, but public health experts have widely debunked it.

    Murrell-Rosario said there are typically five or six people working in each of two offices. She said she will continue to prohibit mask use despite the OSHA fine.

    A $136,000 fine may not sound too hefty, but it is much larger than most penalties OSHA issued during the Trump administration. Those fines were typically in the low five figures, even in cases of major outbreaks at meatpacking plants. After four Smithfield meatpacking plant workers died of COVID-19 last year, OSHA issued a fine of just $13,494.

    In the Massachusetts case, the agency raised the penalty by deeming it a “willful” violation, which comes with a higher price tag than standard fines. “Willful” means the employer knowingly failed to comply with the law or showed “plain indifference” to workers’ health.

    Many workplace safety experts criticized leadership in the Donald Trump administration for not reaching for these big-ticket penalties, arguing that they could have sent a message to other employers that they needed to follow basic safety protocols. They also said the agency was moving too slowly in issuing fines during a public health crisis, often taking nearly six months to hand out citations.

    In the Massachusetts case, investigators moved more quickly. They opened the investigation on March 17 and cited the company three weeks later, on April 8.

    OSHA regulations tend to be highly specific, but there are no rules on the books related expressly to COVID-19. So the agency has issued most of its fines based on the “general duty” clause, a broadly worded rule that says an employer must provide a workplace “free from recognized hazards.”

    Safety advocates have been pressing OSHA to issue a temporary emergency standard that would require employers to follow specific guidelines on the virus, subject to fines. The Trump administration did not issue such a standard, and so far neither has the Biden administration, despite signaling early on that it probably would.

    Murrell-Rosario said none of her employees had gotten sick yet and that the complaints prompting the investigation probably came from customers who were told not to wear masks inside. Initial OSHA fines are often reduced, and Murrell-Rosario said she plans to fight them.

    https://www.huffpost.com/entry/osha...y-fine-coronavirus_n_6075fb1ae4b0e554e8180d3b
     
    FranchiseBlade likes this.
  2. ElPigto

    ElPigto Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2006
    Messages:
    14,691
    Likes Received:
    23,156
    Shut her down. That's what OSHA does to construction sites that are non-compliant and may be a hazard to employees well being.
     
  3. cheke64

    cheke64 Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2009
    Messages:
    23,517
    Likes Received:
    14,909
    I can tell that Rosario is a republican
     
    Andre0087, ROXTXIA and Ubiquitin like this.
  4. ROXTXIA

    ROXTXIA Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2000
    Messages:
    20,024
    Likes Received:
    11,693
    Brother, we can all tell.

    Stevie Wonder could see it.
     
    Andre0087 likes this.
  5. cheke64

    cheke64 Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2009
    Messages:
    23,517
    Likes Received:
    14,909
    imma need to see a pic of Ms.Rosario
     
    No Worries likes this.
  6. Ottomaton

    Ottomaton Contributing Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2000
    Messages:
    18,223
    Likes Received:
    13,425
    [​IMG]
     
  7. hooroo

    hooroo Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2003
    Messages:
    18,898
    Likes Received:
    1,492
  8. deb4rockets

    deb4rockets Contributing Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2013
    Messages:
    19,455
    Likes Received:
    25,365
    Good. What a shitty company to work for. I would have quit, and claimed unemployment on grounds of unsafe working conditions. It's not worth getting Covid because your employer doesn't give a damn if they are putting you at risk of dying, simply because they are ignorant and don't care. I would bet this was a member of the Trump cult who were no maskers and believed in the Covid hoax propaganda.
     
  9. rocketsjudoka

    rocketsjudoka Contributing Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2007
    Messages:
    53,668
    Likes Received:
    41,551
    Yes this seems like a pretty straightforward enforcement of employee safety rules.
     
    ElPigto likes this.
  10. No Worries

    No Worries Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 1999
    Messages:
    29,840
    Likes Received:
    16,695
    I wonder if Liberty Tax Service of Lynn would let you claim your dog as a dependent, since you treat it like your child?
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now