Dem leaders warn liberal rhetoric could blow Georgia races

Dems have to turnout

 

Dunno about GA weather...is it freezing cold in Jan?

Harder to wait hours in line while Proud Blues spray waterhoses at "the mob".

Warnock is choosing wrong words from the Dem playbook. Loeffler is targeting independents, biz owners and desperate job seekers who vote more for Green issues than Black or White issues.

His response should be Fidel would hate my Jobs Plan. Fidel will hate my pro business plan that uplifts blacks and whites.

Loeffler only knows when to cut and run when she gets early word the stock market is in trouble. My goals are the economy, not the interests of Wall St. and their precious stock market!

 

Runoff between a white witch and a black warlock -- 2020 breaking boundaries.

 

I might move there if they ditch debates for live larping events between each other.

 

I had donated to Ossof's campaign. I will make a small donation now to his. Good find.

 

I'll tell you what blows races... when massive numbers of official don't do their job and cheat because they have been deluded into thinking they are saving the world from Dorito Hitler because the media has done nothing but program them for four damn years. When too many people and groups engage in this deranged cause it becomes obvious and when the recount and audit happens, and this is all taken into account, a state flips.

GA will likely flip.

PA will likely flip.

AZ imo should too.

This is why I am sticking with my initial election prediction which, if the actual fair ballots are counted, will be correct.

Also there are wild cards even I didn't expect but with all the violence there from the left it is no surprise if they do actually turn red this year when all the real ballots are accounted for:

WI may flip.

MI may flip as well.

 

What is a fair ballot and an unfair ballot?

Are you trying to make it obvious that you are trolling to make us feel guilty engaging with you?

 

Loeffler's as have been even more disgusting than expected.

Says a lot about her lack of character, but also the quality of Warnock's character that she really had nothing on him to actually attack. Just make up crap instead.

 

I think defund the police is an unfortunate slogan. Demilitarize the police would be a better slogan.

Rep Clyburn of course is famous for receiving the most funds from the healtcare industry of any member of Congress and has earned his money.

Nancy perhaps had a Freudian Slip on the lowering health care".

All members of Congress should be required to have the shitly bronze ACA Care that only the corporate Dems hold so favorable an opinion of.

 

dont know about those states but I am sure that you have definitely flipped and lost your damn mind (or whatever excuse you have for a mind)!

 

How about we 1st stop labelling people within the party.

What's a "old dem" anyway, what's the cutoff date?

Stacy Abrams has been a Dem for almost 20 years is she an "old dem"

 

I'll make a list of, in general terms, what constitutes a ballot that shouldn't be counted. Some can be found in an audit, while others not so much:

• One that wasn't able to be observed by both parties.
• One that was scanned more than once with tape over the number
• One that was filled out by a ballot counter
• One that was tampered with by the postal service via back dating
• One that was ripped up because of a person with rage issues and severe hate for a candidate
• One that was harvested
• One that was delivered after everyone had been sent home to rest at 4 a.m. and no one could verify the legitimacy
• One cast by a person who moved to the state in a time share just to vote and then left afterward
  
• One that was falsely filled out by an unintended recipient and mailed in
• One that is simply printed up and fake
• One that was accepted after the deadline and didn't follow legal regulations
  
• One without the legal water mark denoting it is a real ballot
• One that was changed electronically because of "glitches"
• One that was changed electronically because the clerk made an "error" in how the ballot counting software tallied votes.
  
• And of course one that is from a dead person

That about covers it, but who knows, maybe we will find some more issues.

Now if an audit and recount does find ONE of these, then no problem right? Biden wins and we all can respect that. But, if this is widespread, and it's looking that way, then some states might not be blue after all. This is why Biden is gearing up for a legal battle and raising $30 million. He is not confident that an audit will go his way and he is scared.

 

Why do right wingers confuse voter registration rolls that haven't been updated yet with removing dead people and people who moved out of state with fraud? That isn't fraud. That's voter rolls not being updated, not someone commiting fraud. Commiting fraud would be someone voting twice once, with the dead person's registration which doesn't happen because you can easily get caught and the opportunity cost of prison time isn't worth one added vote. No human thinks like that.

Everything else is heasray. Both party's observers had equal access to observing ballots.

The facts that the courts have rejected all these lawsuits immediately after the Trump lawyers said they have no sincere evidence speaks to how stupid these claims are. Unfortunately for Trump, these lawyers want to keep their Bar licenses so they can't commit perjury and therefore can't fabricate evidence and therefore their cases are getting dismissed left and right.

 

I'll expect an apology when those states start turning red.

 

They didn't have equal access. Also hearsay is a dismissive term for testimonial evidence which is put on an affidavit which, if untrue, is punishable by 5 to 10 years if that person commits perjury. The Republicans have hundreds of counts of testimonial evidence and it's not HEARSAY. That's ridiculous and completely untrue from your end to call it that. It's enough to warrant discovery, which since you're legally ignorant I'll explain. There is a period in a lawsuit called discovery, and that's when more evidence can be dug up by both sides of the case. On top of that, these states have physical evidence in the form of ballots and those can be inspected to confirm that validity of the much of the testimonial evidence.

Also dead people voting is the least of the dems' concern. Some may be from unupdated rolls, but there are instances of LONG DEAD people voting too. And that's literally the last reason I listed because it's the most insignificant. The most is the fact that the Dems counted in secrecy and kept Republicans from observing. That is not legal. Computers were switching votes. That is not legal. People were witnessing scanning the same ballots multiple times with tape on them. That is not legal. People were also witnessed destroying ballots and tampering with them. That is not legal.

And not all cases are being dismissed. You are definitely reading some one sided news if you parrot all the tired talking points I see here today. If there is nothing to be scared of, there is no reason for Biden to lawyer up. He's not the one being sued. It is time you started looking at actions more than the words of media figures who don't understand law at all and have every inventive to down play the massive fraud that swept our nation.

 

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...ty-groups-idUSKBN27T038?utm_source=reddit.com

Don't know why I even bother to post this since it'll just be ruled out as Fake news and liberal media but here ya go.

 

Lol pretty much all the sworn affidavits are claims of "suspicion" such as believing that independent watchers were left wing extremists because they thought they heard someone support BLM. Another example of an affidavit is a lady stating that she saw a van that was supposed to have food for the ballot counter employees but couldn't see what they were offloading because "they were offloading from the back of the van".

These are the types of affidavits that say nothing but aren't purjery. So yes, technically that lady isn't lying because she saw a van offload things... But at the same time any reasonable court is going to be like "ya that isn't evidence of voter fraud, dismissed".

So just because someone is sworn under oath doesn't mean their testimony is useful.