1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Finally, A True Commencement Speech

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by F.D. Khan, Mar 8, 2004.

  1. F.D. Khan

    F.D. Khan Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2000
    Messages:
    2,456
    Likes Received:
    11
    Neal Boortz Commencement Address
    I am honored by the invitation to address you on this august occasion.
    It's about time. Be warned, however, that I am not here to impress you;
    you'll have enough smoke blown your way today. And you can bet your tassels
    I'm not here to impress the faculty and administration.
    You may not like much of what I have to say, and that's fine. You will
    remember it though. Especially after about 10 years out there in the real
    world. This, it goes without saying, does not apply to those of you who
    will seek your careers and your fortunes as government employees.
    This gowned gaggle behind me is your faculty. You've heard the old saying
    that those who can - do. Those who can't - teach. That sounds deliciously
    insensitive. But there is often raw truth in insensitivity, just as you
    often find feel-good falsehoods and lies in compassion. Say good-bye to
    your faculty because now you are getting ready to go out there and do.
    These folks behind me are going to stay right here and teach.
    By the way, just because you are leaving this place with a diploma doesn't
    mean the learning is over. When an FAA flight examiner handed me my private
    pilot's license many years ago, he said, 'Here, this is your ticket to
    learn.' The same can be said for your diploma. Believe me, the learning has
    just begun.
    Now, I realize that most of you consider yourselves Liberals. In fact, you
    are probably very proud of your liberal views. You care so much. You feel
    so much. You want to help so much. After all, you're a compassionate and
    caring person, aren't you now? Well, isn't that just so extraordinarily
    special. Now, at this age, is as good a time as any to be a Liberal; as
    good a time as any to know absolutely everything. You have plenty of time,
    starting tomorrow, for the truth to set in. Over the next few years, as you
    begin to feel the cold breath of reality down your neck, things are going
    to start changing pretty fast .. including your own assessment of just how
    much you really know.
    So here are the first assignments for your initial class in reality: Pay
    attention to the news, read newspapers, and listen to the words and phrases
    that proud Liberals use to promote their causes. Then compare the words of
    the left to the words and phrases you hear from those evil, heartless,
    greedy conservatives. From the Left you will hear "I feel." From the Right
    you will hear "I think." From the Liberals you will hear references to
    groups --The Blacks, The Poor, The Rich, The Disadvantaged, The Less
    Fortunate. >From the Right you will hear references to individuals. On the
    Left you hear talk of group rights; on the Right, individual rights.
    That about sums it up, really: Liberals feel. Liberals care. They are pack
    animals whose identity is tied up in group dynamics. Conservatives and
    Libertarians think -- and, setting aside the theocracy crowd, their
    identity is centered on the individual.
    Liberals feel that their favored groups, have enforceable rights to the
    property and services of productive individuals. Conservatives (and
    Libertarians, myself among them I might add) think that individuals have
    the right to protect their lives and their property from the plunder of the
    masses.
    In college you developed a group mentality, but if you look closely at your
    diplomas you will see that they have your individual names on them. Not the
    name of your school mascot, or of your fraternity or sorority, but your
    name. Your group identity is going away. Your recognition and appreciation
    of your individual identity starts now.
    If, by the time you reach the age of 30, you do not consider yourself to be
    a libertarian or a conservative, rush right back here as quickly as you can
    and apply for a faculty position. These people will welcome you with open
    arms. They will welcome you, that is, so long as you haven't developed an
    individual identity. Once again you will have to be willing to sign on to
    the group mentality you embraced during the past four years.
    Something is going to happen soon that is going to really open your eyes.
    You're going to actually get a full time job! You're also going to get a
    lifelong work partner. This partner isn't going to help you do your job.
    This partner is just going to sit back and wait for payday. This partner
    doesn't want to share in your effort, you're your earnings.
    Your new lifelong partner is actually an agent. An agent representing a
    strange and diverse group of people. An agent for every teenager with an
    illegitimate child. An agent for a research scientist who wanted to make
    some cash answering the age-old question of why monkeys grind their teeth.
    An agent for some poor demented hippie who considers herself to be a
    meaningful and talented artist ... but who just can't manage to sell any of
    her artwork on the open market.
    Your new partner is an agent for every person with limited, if any, job
    skills . but who wanted a job at City Hall. An agent for tin-horn dictators
    in fancy military uniforms grasping for American foreign aid. An agent for
    multi-million-dollar companies who want someone else to pay for their
    overseas advertising. An agent for everybody who wants to use the
    unimaginable power of this agent's for their personal enrichment and
    benefit.
    That agent is our wonderful, caring, compassionate, oppressive government.
    Believe me, you will be awed by the unimaginable power this agent has.
    Power that you do not have. A power that no individual has, or will have.
    This agent has the legal power to use force deadly force to accomplish
    its goals.
    You have no choice here. Your new friend is just going to walk up to you,
    introduce itself rather gruffly, hand you a few forms to fill out, and move
    right on in. Say hello to your own personal one ton gorilla. It will sleep
    anywhere it wants to.
    Now, let me tell you, this agent is not cheap. As you become successful it
    will seize about 40% of everything you earn. And no, I'm sorry, there just
    isn't any way you can fire this agent of plunder, and you can't decrease
    it's share of your income. That power rests with him, not you.
    So, here I am saying negative things to you about government. Well, be
    clear on this: It is not wrong to distrust government. It is not wrong to
    fear government. In certain cases it is not even wrong to despise
    government for government is inherently evil. Yes ... a necessary evil, but
    dangerous nonetheless ... somewhat like a drug. Just as a drug that in the
    proper dosage can save your life, an overdose of government can be fatal.
    Now let's address a few things that have been crammed into your minds at
    this university. There are some ideas you need to expunge as soon as
    possible. These ideas may work well in academic environment, but they fail
    miserably out there in the real world.
    First that favorite buzz word of the media, government and academia:
    Diversity!
    You have been taught that the real value of any group of people - be it a
    social group, an employee group, a management group, whatever - is based on
    diversity. This is a favored liberal ideal because diversity is based not
    on an individual's abilities or character, but on a person's identity and
    status as a member of a group. Yes it's that liberal group identity thing
    again.
    Within the great diversity movement group identification - be it racial,
    gender based, or some other minority status - means more than the
    individual's integrity, character or other qualifications.
    Brace yourself. You are about to move from this academic atmosphere where
    diversity rules, to a workplace and a culture where individual achievement
    and excellence actually count. No matter what your professors have taught
    you over the last four years, you are about to learn that diversity is
    absolutely no replacement for excellence, ability, and individual hard
    work. From this day on every single time you hear the word "diversity" you
    can rest assured that there is someone close by who is determined to rob
    you of every vestige of individuality you possess.
    We also need to address this thing you seem to have about "rights." We have
    witnessed an obscene explosion of so-called "rights" in the last few
    decades, usually emanating from college campuses.
    You know the mantra: You have the right to a job. The right to a place to
    live. The right to a living wage. The right to health care. The right to an
    education. You probably even have your own pet right - the right to a
    Beemer, for instance, or the right to have someone else provide for that
    child you plan on downloading in a year or so.
    Forget it. Forget those rights! I'll tell you what your rights are! You
    have a right to live free, and to the results of your labor. I'll also tell
    you have no right to any portion of the life or labor of another.
    You may, for instance, think that you have a right to health care. After
    all, Hillary said so, didn't she? But you cannot receive health care unless
    some doctor or health practitioner surrenders some of his time - his life -
    to you. He may be willing to do this for compensation, but that's his
    choice. You have no "right" to his time or property. You have no right to
    his or any other person's life or to any portion thereof.
    You may also think you have some "right" to a job; a job with a living
    wage, whatever that is. Do you mean to tell me that you have a right to
    force your services on another person, and then the right to demand that
    this person compensate you with their money? Sorry, forget it. I am sure
    you would scream if some urban outdoorsmen (that would be "homeless person"
    for those of you who don't want to give these less fortunate people a
    romantic and adventurous title) came to you and demanded his job and your
    money.
    The people who have been telling you about all the rights you have are
    simply exercising one of theirs - the right to be imbeciles. Their being
    imbeciles didn't cost anyone else either property or time. It's their
    right, and they exercise it brilliantly.
    By the way, did you catch my use of the phrase "less fortunate" a bit ago
    when I was talking about the urban outdoorsmen? That phrase is a favorite
    of the Left. Think about it, and you'll understand why.
    To imply that one person is homeless, destitute, dirty, drunk, spaced out
    on drugs, unemployable, and generally miserable because he is "less
    fortunate" is to imply that a successful person - one with a job, a home
    and a future - is in that position because he or she was "fortunate." The
    dictionary says that fortunate means "having derived good from an
    unexpected place." There is nothing unexpected about deriving good from
    hard work. There is also nothing unexpected about deriving misery from
    choosing drugs, alcohol, and the street.
    If the Left can create the common perception that success and failure are
    simple matters of "fortune" or "luck," then it is easy to promote and
    justify their various income redistribution schemes. After all, we are just
    evening out the odds a little bit.
    This "success equals luck" idea the liberals like to push is seen
    everywhere. Democratic presidential candidate Richard Gephardt refers to
    high-achievers as "people who have won life's lottery." He wants you to
    believe they are making the big bucks because they are lucky.
    It's not luck, my friends. It's choice. One of the greatest lessons I ever
    learned was in a book by Og Mandino, entitled "The Greatest Secret in the
    World." The lesson? Very simple: "Use wisely your power of choice."
    That bum sitting on a heating grate, smelling like a wharf rat? He's there
    by choice. He is there because of the sum total of the choices he has made
    in his life. This truism is absolutely the hardest thing for some people to
    accept, especially those who consider themselves to be victims of something
    or other - victims of discrimination, bad luck, the system, capitalism,
    whatever. After all, nobody really wants to accept the blame for his or her
    position in life. Not when it is so much easier to point and say, "Look! He
    did this to me!" than it is to look into a mirror and say, "You S.O.B.! You
    did this to me!"
    The key to accepting responsibility for your life is to accept the fact
    that your choices, every one of them, are leading you inexorably to either
    success or failure, however you define those terms.
    Some of the choices are obvious: Whether or not to stay in school. Whether
    or not to get pregnant. Whether or not to hit the bottle. Whether or not to
    keep this job you hate until you get another better-paying job. Whether or
    not to save some of your money, or saddle yourself with huge payments for
    that new car.
    Some of the choices are seemingly insignificant: Whom to go to the movies
    with. Whose car to ride home in. Whether to watch the tube tonight, or read
    a book on investing. But, and you can be sure of this, each choice counts.
    Each choice is a building block - some large, some small. But each one is a
    part of the structure of your life. If you make the right choices, or if
    you make more right choices than wrong ones, something absolutely terrible
    may happen to you. Something unthinkable. You, my friend, could become one
    of the hated, the evil, the ugly, the feared, the filthy,, the successful,
    the rich.
    Quite a few people have made that mistake.
    The rich basically serve two purposes in this country. First, they provide
    the investments, the investment capital, and the brains for the formation
    of new businesses. Businesses that hire people. Businesses that send
    millions of paychecks home each week to the un-rich.
    Second, the rich are a wonderful object of ridicule, distrust, and hatred.
    Few things are more valuable to a politician than the envy most Americans
    feel for the evil rich.
    Envy is a powerful emotion. Even more powerful than the emotional minefield
    that surrounded Bill Clinton when he reviewed his last batch of White House
    interns. Politicians use envy to get votes and power. And they keep that
    power by promising the envious that the envied will be punished: "The rich
    will pay their fair share of taxes if I have anything to do with it.' The
    truth is that the top 10% of income earners in this country pays almost 50%
    of all income taxes collected. I shudder to think what these job producers
    would be paying if our tax system were any more "fair."
    You have heard, no doubt, that in the rich get richer and the poor get
    poorer. Interestingly enough, our government's own numbers show that many
    of the poor actually get richer, and that quite a few of the rich actually
    get poorer. But for the rich who do actually get richer, and the poor who
    remain poor . there's an explanation -- a reason. The rich, you see, keep
    doing the things that make them rich; while the poor keep doing the things
    that make them poor.
    Speaking of the poor, during your adult life you are going to hear an
    endless string of politicians bemoaning the plight of the poor in . So, you
    need to know that under our government's definition of "poor" you can have
    a $5 million net worth, a $300,000 home and a new $90,000 Mercedes, all
    completely paid for. You can also have a maid, cook, and valet, and $1
    million in your checking account, and you can still be officially defined
    by our government as "living in poverty." Now there's something you haven't
    seen on the evening news.
    How does the government pull this one off? Very simple, really. To
    determine whether or not some poor soul is "living in poverty," the
    government measures one thing -- just one thing. Income. It doesn't matter
    one bit how much you have, how much you own, how many cars you drive or how
    big they are, whether or not your pool is heated, whether you winter in
    Aspen and spend the summers in the Bahamas, or how much is in your savings
    account. It only matters how much income you claim in that particular year.
    This means that if you take a one-year leave of absence from your
    high-paying job and decide to live off the money in your savings and
    checking accounts while you write the next great American novel, the
    government says you are 'living in poverty."
    This isn't exactly what you had in mind when you heard these gloomy
    statistics, is it?
    Do you need more convincing? Try this. The government's own statistics show
    that people who are said to be "living in poverty" spend more than $1.50
    for each dollar of income they claim. Something is a bit fishy here. just
    remember all this the next time Peter Jennings puffs up and tells you about
    some hideous new poverty statistics.
    Why has the government concocted this phony poverty scam? Because the
    government needs an excuse to grow and to expand its social welfare
    programs, which translates into an expansion of its power. If the
    government can convince you, in all your compassion, that the number of
    "poor" is increasing, it will have all the excuse it needs to sway an
    electorate suffering from the advanced stages of Obsessive-Compulsive
    Compassion Disorder.
    I'm about to be stoned by the faculty here. They've already changed their
    minds about that honorary degree I was going to get. That's OK, though. I
    still have my Ph.D. in Insensitivity from the Neal Boortz Institute for
    Insensitivity Training. I learned that, in short, sensitivity sucks. It's a
    trap. Think about it - the truth knows no sensitivity. Life can be
    insensitive. Wallow too much in sensitivity and you'll be unable to deal
    with life, or the truth. So, get over it.
    Now, before the dean has me shackled and hauled off, I have a few random
    thoughts.
    * You need to register to vote, unless you are on welfare. If you are
    living off the efforts of others, please do us the favor of sitting down
    and shutting up until you are on your own again.
    * When you do vote, your votes for the House and the Senate are more
    important than your vote for president. The House controls the purse
    strings, so concentrate your awareness there.
    * Liars cannot be trusted, even when the liar is the president of the . If
    someone can't deal honestly with you, send them packing.
    * Don't bow to the temptation to use the government as an instrument of
    plunder. If it is wrong for you to take money from someone else who earned
    it -- to take their money by force for your own needs -- then it is
    certainly just as wrong for you to demand that the government step forward
    and do this dirty work for you.
    * Don't look in other people's pockets. You have no business there. What
    they earn is theirs. What your earn is yours. Keep it that way. Nobody owes
    you anything, except to respect your privacy and your rights, and leave you
    the hell alone.
    * Speaking of earning, the revered 40-hour workweek is for losers. Forty
    hours should be considered the minimum, not the maximum. You don't see
    highly successful people clocking out of the office every afternoon at
    five. The losers are the ones caught up in that afternoon rush hour. The
    winners drive home in the dark.
    * Free speech is meant to protect unpopular speech. Popular speech, by
    definition, needs no protection.
    * Finally (and aren't you glad to hear that word), as Og Mandino wrote,
    1. Proclaim your rarity. Each of you is a rare and unique human being.
    2. Use wisely your power of choice.
    3. Go the extra mile ... drive home in the dark.
    Oh, and put off buying a television set as long as you can.
    Now, if you have any idea at all what's good for you, you will get the hell
    out of here and never come back.
    Class dismissed.
     
  2. KingCheetah

    KingCheetah Atomic Playboy
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2002
    Messages:
    59,079
    Likes Received:
    52,748
    "...setting aside the theocracy crowd, their identity is centered on the individual."

    That's a pretty big 'group' of conservatives to set aside.

    :D
     
  3. P. Moon

    P. Moon Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2003
    Messages:
    189
    Likes Received:
    2
    I really enjoy Neal's radio show. Before he gets jumped on though, I will mention the fact that numerous times on his radio show he has stood up for gays and gay rights, probably costing him a large portion of his "conservative" audience. That, and other things have more than earned my respect for him.
     
  4. rimrocker

    rimrocker Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 1999
    Messages:
    23,102
    Likes Received:
    10,114
  5. B-Bob

    B-Bob "94-year-old self-described dreamer"
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2002
    Messages:
    35,985
    Likes Received:
    36,840
    awww gee whiz, rimrocker. "ur no fun."

    By the way, if I had known spreading hate, fear, and anger via radio was so lucrative... I would still have chosen to teach science to young adults.

    Think Boorishtz is doing more good telling people to turn their minds OFF than those of us helping kids to turn their minds ON? What a sad, bitter man. Anyone have his college transcript on hand? ;)
     
  6. thadeus

    thadeus Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2003
    Messages:
    8,313
    Likes Received:
    726
    The irony is palpable.
     
  7. RocketMan Tex

    RocketMan Tex Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 1999
    Messages:
    18,452
    Likes Received:
    119
    Leave it to Funky Dancing Khan to post bullsh*t on this BBS without checking Snopes first!:D
     
  8. SamFisher

    SamFisher Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2003
    Messages:
    61,826
    Likes Received:
    41,301
    While I disagree wholeheartedly with Boortz' ignorant rant, in FDK's defense whether or not it was delivered as a commencement speech isn't that big of a deal to me.

    If it was rife with documented, easily verifiable factual inaccuracies, lies and fabrications, like some of the crap chain emails that are posted up here, then it would be one thing.

    However it looks like boortz doesn't bother with facts and just delivers a bunch recycled platitudes and allusions aimed against "the Liberals" in general, whoever that is, without any citation to any facts whatsoever. Not really worth anybody's time to dissect.
     
  9. P. Moon

    P. Moon Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2003
    Messages:
    189
    Likes Received:
    2
     
  10. 111chase111

    111chase111 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2000
    Messages:
    1,660
    Likes Received:
    21
    You might be suprised. The religious right gets a lot of press but there are a ton of people on the right who aren't religious.

    Like me. Actually I'm more than not religious, I'm an athiest and it's funny because the last political debate I was in (against a Democratic friend of mine) was about whether people should be allowed a moment of silence to pray (or whatever) in school. I was for it (actually not so much for it as not having a problem with it) and he was against it. One of his arguements was if a Muslim kid rolled out his prayer mat and began to bow towards Mecca he might get beat up! I thought the left was FOR diversity. Doesn't diversity include religious diversity?
     
  11. Mulder

    Mulder Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 1999
    Messages:
    7,118
    Likes Received:
    81
    Did giddy learn restraint with his emails or did FD just beat him to the punch, err post? :confused:
     
  12. bamaslammer

    bamaslammer Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2003
    Messages:
    3,853
    Likes Received:
    4
    Neal is a great guy who tells it like it as. He's a great banner carrier for libertarianism, but like me, he often disagrees with the party. As for that commencement address, he knew he'd never get to deliver that bit of truth to a commencement address, being that most school admin and faculty are on the Glynch/Sam Fisher/put your favorite liberal poster's name here side of the political dial. Great post, FD. About time there was something from the Talkmaster (his name for himself, not mine) posted here.
     

Share This Page