The jump from 8% in 2014 to 22% now is the most striking thing about that. A missing data point that would be very interesting is denial of service to Christians or white people for “religious freedom” purposes. It’s unfortunate that’s not included here.
Why not? One has to be Blessed in order to be rich, a celebrity and/or President. If the Blessed are racist, sexist, or vile human beings...who am I to judge?
America today: Big Tech sites censor conservatives But muh private business Baker doesn't want to make a cake for someone But muh rights. Flip side of that.... Big Tech sites censor conservatives But muh rights Baker doesn't want to make a cake for someone But muh private business.
It means they think one should have the right to refuse service to any individual, for whatever reason (even a really bad reason). Individual choice. I don't see why it should be cast as "religious freedom" to be an *******, if that's what one wants to be.
