No voting if you owe court fines

Should knowledge of us history be required to vote? You seem to not know it.

 

I would not be too confident that the Repugs on the S. Ct wd not do it to protect Dear Leader and McConnel and their appointers.

 

I guess next they will want you to provide proof of citizenship,age and not be incarcerated, assholes!

 

Should have to pass an IQ test to register to vote.

Wonder who this would benefit.

 

I think that you should be educated on the candidates and policies that they are supporting.

I also know that court costs will never have any impact on my life. I won't worry about people who break the law and then can't afford to pay their fines.

You're entitled to your opinion though as am I.

 

Whatever candidates you support would lose 1 vote, I know that much.

 

i think you would be very disappointed in this outcome.

 

Do you think only people who have broken the law incur court costs?

 

Yeah because taking away someone's right to vote if they owe money is really going to incentivize them to pay back that debt...but it will definitely help out one party over the other.

 

I think we should only allow people with college degrees to vote.

 

Only if they crew?

 

No. I understand divorce and instances like that can occur but you clearly know what my stance is. I'm not trying to exclude those people obviously . Possibly could have worded it better

 

You're a troll and a poor one. Just look at your history and it's played out in guidelines. Your opinion is meaningless.

 

We could go Starship Troopers.

"A citizen accepts personal responsibility for the safety of the body politik. Defending it with his life. A civilian does not."

 

I'd be tempted if they applied this to tax dodgers and removed their speech rights for campaign contributions.

 

Seriously? My response (which wasn't personal AT ALL), made you this unhinged? Seek help now!

 

Anyone who believes this is speaking from a position of privilege.

 

Liberals, without doubt or question.

 

Which is the insidious thing about this idea. Half the citizenry who can vote don't bother to anyway. People know their vote's incremental impact on election outcomes is minuscule. Individuals denied the vote won't work all that hard to get it back. But, the impact for the politicians can be very significant. It's like a fraud that takes a penny from every American -- each victim barely notices or cares, but it would make the perpetrator a millionaire.

 

What does one have to do with the other?