You have it exactly backwards. I am generally pleased with how Mueller has carried out the investigation of Russian interference in our elections and any possible connection with the Trump campaign - the evidence to support the latter of which appears to be none. The main exception to that is the gestapo-like midnight raids, which were entirely unnecessary and certainly not consistent with how Hillary Clinton's email investigation was conducted. But that was two incidents as far as I am aware, and water under the bridge. I want Mueller's investigation to be completed and I do not want him interfered with, except to make sure that he is being properly supervised and his activities are being restricted to those that are properly within his mandate. Which as far as I can tell based on what I have seen so far, is being done appropriately. No, what needs to happen is the flawed and corrupt investigation into Hillary Clinton's mishandling of classified documents needs to be re-opened, very possibly under the authority of a second special counsel, and the same tactics, tone and level of aggressiveness and scrutiny that have been used by Mueller and his team towards Trump and the Republicans needs to be applied to Hillary and and the scandalous corruption of the DOJ and the FBI under the Democrat left Obama regime. The answer is not to reduce any accountability for Trump. It is to make sure that same accountability is enforced on the spectacularly corrupt and criminal elements of the Democrat left, which as demonstrated by your post above, you clearly appear to be a sycophantic supporter of.
I don't see the need you see. She circumvented the government email system and with it the rules around government records. It's not nothing. In fact, I refused to vote for her (despite Trump) for this exact reason. But circumventing government email was something everyone was doing -- I think everyone is still doing it today -- and while possibly corrupt it does not appear to have been malicious. So, what's that worth as a punishment if Clinton was to be made an example of to get all those other politicians off of gmail? A year in federal prison maybe? More than that seems unreasonable. So how much effort is that worth? But I'm not opposed. Maybe they find something more serious with a fishing expedition. And really I have no need at all for Hillary Clinton. If she ran in 2020, I think she'd be in the way. I don't know if a special counsel is necessary -- the point of that is to insulate an investigation because it is investigating someone in a seat of power. Clinton is a private citizen and can't really meddle in an investigation run by the FBI. But, if you're worried that some Deep Stater is going to mess stuff up, fine spend the money on a Special Counsel. As far as foolish spend in the federal government goes, it's small potatoes. Investigate her, harass her, put her in a gulag. There's something you might not have realized though. Not all Democrats have realized it yet either. Democrats are done with her; she's used up and has no more utility. The party has to move on now with new people. So by focusing investigations on Hillary Clinton Republicans will be wasting their chits they should be using to oppose whoever is next in the opposing party.
No, I leave backwards thinking to folks like you. Well, none except for the numerous people involved with the Trump campaign who have already been indicted and the one who has already pled guilty and been sent to jail. Gestapo-like? Seriously? Again, you seem to be of the opinion that mishandling email and colluding with a foreign adversary to affect the outcome of an American election are similar as far as level of offense. They're not... https://getyarn.io/yarn-clip/c8e04f24-cdec-43f1-b83f-20705c7970b0 The strange part is that on this, you seem perfectly reasonable... ...and over here, you go WAY off the deep end. You think the same level of investigation is needed for an incident involving the mishandling of email as there is for an incident which involves a foreign power actively working to influence the outcome of an American election. Your biased partisanship is showing. I didn't vote for Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, or Hillary Clinton in any election where they have appeared on my ballot, so "sycophantic supporter" doesn't describe me in the least. I love that you assume and accuse the "Democratic left" of being corrupt criminals when exactly zero Obama administration officials have ever been indicted for a crime, even after a Republican AG has been in place for well over a year. Your assumptions are noted, but appear to be WILDLY off-base.
