Rule of Law people. Let the Congressional hearings begin! _________________________ FEC Fines Ashcroft's Senate Bid For Breach By Thomas B. Edsall and Walter Pincus Washington Post Staff Writers Wednesday, December 17, 2003; Page A01 The Federal Election Commission has determined that Attorney General John D. Ashcroft's unsuccessful 2000 Senate reelection campaign violated election laws by accepting $110,000 in illegal contributions from a committee Ashcroft had established to explore running for president. In documents released yesterday by the FEC, Garrett M. Lott, treasurer for the two Ashcroft committees, the Spirit of America PAC and Ashcroft 2000, agreed to pay a $37,000 fine for at least four violations of federal campaign law. Lott agreed "not to contest" the charges. "Spirit of America PAC and Ashcroft 2000, respectively, violated the [law] by making and receiving this excessive contribution. Additionally, Spirit of America PAC and Ashcroft 2000, respectively, violated the [law] by failing to disclose the making or receipt of the excessive contribution," the FEC declared in a news release. Under the law, the Spirit of America PAC was allowed to give the Ashcroft 2000 committee only $5,000 for the primary and $5,000 for the general election, which it did. The commission found that the Spirit of America PAC far exceeded these limits by illegally transferring to the Ashcroft 2000 committee $110,000 derived from the rental of its donors list. The FEC vote to fine the Ashcroft committee was 5 to 1, and the one dissenter sought harsher penalties and tougher findings. The three Republican members of the commission joined two of the Democrats in voting for the penalties. But two Republican members, David M. Mason and Michael E. Toner, played down the significance of the findings. "This matter was a garden variety complaint regarding a series of mailing list transactions between two political committees, which was blown far out of proportion, apparently due to the involvement of the sitting attorney general, who is a favored target of political attacks by opponents of the current administration," they said in a statement. The one dissenter, Ellen L. Weintraub, the Democratic commission chairman, said the agreement "ignores the heart of the complaint, the wholesale transfer of a mailing list, developed at a cost of $1.7 million" to Ashcroft 2000. "The [$37,000] penalty . . . is so low that I do not believe it adequately reflects the severity of the conduct at issue." A spokesman for the Department of Justice declined to comment. Lott, contacted by phone at his St. Louis law offices, also declined to comment. After serving one term in the Senate from Missouri, Ashcroft, a former governor and a favorite of conservatives, considered running for the Republican presidential nomination in 2000. But with then-Texas Gov. George W. Bush the overwhelming favorite to win the nomination, Ashcroft decided to run for reelection instead. But his Democratic opponent, Mel Carnahan, who had been killed in a plane crash during the campaign, received more votes. His wife, Jean Carnahan, was then appointed to take his place, and Ashcroft joined the Bush administration. An 11-page "conciliation agreement" signed by Lott and the FEC legal staff outlines the complex financial arrangements between Ashcroft's presidential exploratory committee and his Senate reelection committee. While Ashcroft was considering a presidential bid, he formed the Spirit of America PAC, which invested at least $1.7 million in 3.9 million "prospecting" letters to build a valuable list of donors, according to the agreement. Starting in May 1998, the Spirit PAC began to rent out its contributor list, collecting fees from other groups and candidates seeking lists of conservative donors. On Jan. 5, 1999, Ashcroft announced that he was abandoning his presidential bid. Throughout 1999 and early 2000, the Spirit PAC continued to rent out its donor list. On Dec. 10, 1999, Lott wrote to the list management firm, Omega List Co., that is it "the intention of Mr. Ashcroft that all list rental revenue . . . be attributed to Ashcroft 2000." On Dec. 30, 1999, Omega issued a check for $66,662.22 to Ashcroft 2000, which described the money on campaign finance reports as "mail receipts." On March 31, 2000, another list firm, PMI, paid Ashcroft 2000 $46,299.83 for "Assignment of Accounts Receivable." The conciliation agreement declares: "The list rental income in the form of the re-issued checks, and the proceeds from the sale of accounts receivable by Ashcroft 2000, which totaled over $110,000, constituted an excessive contribution from the PAC to Ashcroft 2000 in violation" of two sections of campaign law. In a formal statement accompanying the conciliation agreement, Weintraub cited a number of letters and other documents signed by Ashcroft to demonstrate his active participation in what the commission found to be illegal campaign contributions. On a 3 to 3 split vote, the FEC rejected the recommendation of its general counsel, Lawrence H. Norton, to find that the violations involved illegal contributions of $254,000. The three Democrats backed the counsel and the three Republicans opposed him. The issue of the Ashcroft campaign's use of the Spirit for America's donor list was first raised by The Washington Post in February 2001, and the next month the National Voting Rights Institute, Common Cause, the Alliance for Democracy and two Missouri voters filed a complaint with the FEC. In March 2002, the National Voting Rights Institute representing the two voters and the Alliance for Democracy filed suit charging that the FEC had failed to investigate the apparent illegal contribution. Ashcroft's Senate campaign committee initially tried to get the lawsuit dropped. In October 2002, the plaintiffs asked Ashcroft to release records of the FEC investigation. The attorney general refused and another suit was filed, this one seeking a court order to have the records released or have the FEC make a finding. The National Voting Rights Institute yesterday charged that the $37,000 fine was inadequate, amounting to a "tax" on illegal activities. "The Federal Election Commission's action in this case is a farce," said Bonnie Tenneriello, an attorney with the institute. "John Ashcroft's political committees, and possibly John Ashcroft himself, engaged in serious violations of federal campaign finance law during the 2000 election. The FEC's fine is merely a slap on the wrist."
He will skate, and you know it, rimrocker. I'm not sure if he's more crooked, deranged, or stupid. He's a very hard read. And so is Ashcroft. (sorry, TheFreak, but I could not resist).
And that matters why? A law's a law. At least the Republican manslaughterer from South Dakota had the conscience to resign. RULE OF LAW
A fine example our Attorney General is setting .... **************** Judge Rebukes Ashcroft for Gag Violation Attorney General Says His Remarks About Terrorism Trial Were 'Inadvertent' By Robert E. Pierre Washington Post Staff Writer Wednesday, December 17, 2003; Page A27 A federal judge in Detroit sharply criticized Attorney General John D. Ashcroft yesterday for violating a gag order in the nation's first terrorism trial after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. U.S. District Judge Gerald Rosen said Ashcroft "exhibited a distressing lack of care" by issuing public statements during the nine-week trial that ended in June, despite a court order prohibiting them. Twice, Ashcroft publicly praised the government's lead witness in the case. Rosen said Ashcroft will not face criminal contempt charges but that a public rebuke was necessary. "Despite his unquestioned duty to represent the nation on matters of public concern . . . the Attorney General has an equally vital and unyielding obligation, as the nation's chief prosecutor, to ensure that defendants are accorded the fair trial guaranteed them under the constitution," Rosen wrote in a ruling issued Tuesday. "In this case, this essential balance was jeopardized, even after the court had issued specific warnings." In a letter to Rosen late last month, Ashcroft said the remarks were inadvertent. He repeated that comment in a statement yesterday. "While the two statements in question were inadvertent and in no way intended to either disregard the court's order, or disrupt the ongoing trial, I can see how these two statements, however brief and passing, could be considered by the court to be a breach of the court's order," Ashcroft said in a statement. "I take this matter very seriously and will make every effort to ensure that the difficulties occasioned in this instance will be avoided in the future." The case involved four men accused of making up a sleeper cell of terrorists plotting attacks in the United States and abroad. Two of them -- Abdel-Ilah Elmardoudi and Karim Koubriti -- were convicted of conspiring to provide material support to terrorists. A third, Ahmed Hannan, was acquitted of terrorism charges but convicted of engaging in document fraud, and the fourth, Farouk Ali-Haimoud, was acquitted of all charges. But last week, in a rare post-trial hearing, Rosen criticized prosecutors for belatedly turning over evidence that defense attorneys contend would have helped exonerate their clients. The two lead prosecutors in the case have been removed without public explanation. Rosen is expected to issue a decision in January on the defendants' request for a new trial. Lawyers for the defendants asked for a mistrial after Ashcroft's statements in April, but Rosen denied the request after polling jurors. None said they were aware of the comments. Rosen had said he would decide later whether to hold Ashcroft in contempt, ultimately opting against it in yesterday's 83-page opinion. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A6347-2003Dec16.html
"Today, Attorney General John Ashcroft concluded his investigation into his own alleged wrongdoings, and has found the allegations baseless."
i've wondered how in the hell that's supposed to work. "hey, let's put the accused in charge of the investigation! then we'll get to the bottom of this!" "brilliant!"
Essentially, the pot won't have to call the kettle black, if the kettle will just take responsibility and admit it's black. Or something.
