1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

The Joe Bob Middle East Peace Plan

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by mrpaige, Nov 19, 2003.

  1. mrpaige

    mrpaige Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2000
    Messages:
    8,831
    Likes Received:
    15
    The Joe Bob Middle East Peace Plan
    by Joe Bob Briggs

    Reprinted from
    June 13, 2003
    Okay, I've kept my mouth shut long enough. It's time for the Joe Bob Briggs Plan for Peace in the Middle East.

    You should listen to me. I'm not a Jew. I'm not an Arab. I'm not one of those wacky hard-shell Babtist types who think we need to support Israel so that Jesus can come back and destroy the world. I'm also not one of those Vanessa Redgrave types who thinks the PLO is a charity for orphans.

    I've been to the Middle East, and I think they're all insane. Most of them anyway. They remind me of my cousins in the Ozarks who think the Trilateral Commission is poisoning the headwaters of the Arkansas River so they can destroy the alligator gar population. Fortunately my cousins never roam more than 30 miles from their birthplace, whereas in Israel and Palestine--and let's throw in Lebanon and Syria as well--we've got conspiracy theorists with weapons in every household. It's like a Kentucky blood feud being worked out on a global scale.

    I've been studying this thing for 20 years now, ever since I was trapped in Beirut with some other American cowboys who all would have been better off writing about chili cookoffs in Tucson, and the pattern to the conflict is so simple, and the way to disrupt it is so obvious, that you're gonna think I'm naive when I say this.

    The following pattern has happened at least 30 times in the last decade:

    1. There's a lull in the action.
    2. Somebody in America says, "Let's make a peace plan."
    3. The Israelis have a screaming debate about whether it's time for a peace plan.
    4. The Palestinians have fistfights about whether it's time for a peace plan.
    5. The evangelical Christians in America put heavy-duty pressure on the United States to not give away a single inch of Israeli land.
    6. A date is set for the two sides to meet.
    7. The Palestinians blow something up.
    8. The date is changed.
    9. The Palestinians blow something bigger up.
    10. The meeting is canceled.
    11. The Israelis blow up some Palestinians.
    12. America gets all upset. It's time for "restraint," America says. It's time for "concessions on both sides," America says.
    13. "We told you so," say the American Christians.
    14. There's a lull in the action.
    15. Start over at 2.

    Now. If you've been paying attention, you'll notice that the Palestinians don't just go around suicide-bombing willy-nilly. They suicide-bomb at specific times and places. They have their suicide bombers ready, but they only use them when something happens. Among the things that can happen:

    1. A peace conference is scheduled.
    2. An Israeli politician makes some major concession, like closing settlements or releasing prisoners.
    3. A Palestinian leader says something favorable about a partition plan.

    This is because the rednecks like chaos. Organizations like Hamas will always be with us, just like the Ku Klux Klan will always be with us. There will always be a missing-gene club where brain-damaged lowlifes can gather in the woods and try to establish some blood-thirsty racial purity scheme with bombs and rifles.

    You can spy on them. You can infiltrate their organizations. You can put them in computers. You can raid their arms caches. You can clap them in jail every time they make an illegal left turn.

    What you can't do is kill their grandmothers and their children. Every time you do that, they win 50 new recruits. We learned that at Waco.

    Israel is a civilized modern country, and even they have a few loose-cannon extremist gun nuts who want to wipe out every non-Jew between the Mediterranean and the Euphrates. And yes, some of these people were embittered by losing their daughters and grandmothers in street attacks. The difference between Israel and Palestine, fortunately, is that the Mossad keeps their headcases under control.

    It's a classic revenge cycle, but in this case it's one- sided because Israel is a full state and Palestine is a half- state, and when you have that kind of loose structure, the warrens and cubbyholes will teem with rats. Arafat couldn't control it. Abbas can't control it.

    And Israel can't control it. Their latest recipe, ordering the army to "completely wipe out" Hamas "from the lowliest member to Shiek Ahmed Yassin," is destined to litter the ground with so many dead cousins, uncles, soccer teammates and neighborhood grocery store clerks that each guided missile launched from a helicopter is like a spraygun planting hate seeds in a rocky soil where the plants will grow up lean and mean.

    What's amazing at this point is that, each time we start a peace process and then the country breaks into violence, people seem surprised by it. The New York Times says, "Just when things were looking good . . ."

    Listen up, people. It's the peace process itself that triggers the violence. It's a direct cause-and-effect relationship. As soon as a peace plan is even rumored, Israel should automatically go to Level Hot Orange Terrorism Alert. The idea that people are still shocked and amazed when a bus blows up three days after something positive happens is in itself is amazing.

    Hamas and Hamas types want total bloody victory--they want the Jews pushed into the ocean. Any peace initiative is, to them, a defeat, and is more dangerous than simple day-to-day miserable status-quo limbo.

    Three things infuriated them in recent weeks:

    1. A new Palestinian Prime Minister, Mahmoud Abbas, was praised by the world community as a beacon of peace.
    2. A Middle Eastern summit meeting was held in Jordan and attended by President Bush.
    3. Ariel Sharon himself said that he supports the creation of a Palestinian state and the withdrawal of the Israeli army from Palestinian cities.

    Any one of these things, standing alone, is enough to nuke a disco. All of them coming together, with a "road map" to create two nations that coexist, was the signal for Hamas to dial up every available martyr checked out on an explosive vest to report to the clubhouse.

    And when they did start killing Jews, everyone reacted as they'd hoped. Ariel Sharon turned from weary compromising statesman to scorched-earth hawk. President Bush stopped talking about "restraint." The helicopter gunships took to the air, and the terrorists were blessed with 30 innocent civilian martyrs.

    It was necessary, said Sharon and Bush, because Mahmoud Abbas isn't strong enough to jail the Hamas members. Abbas instead wants to negotiate a ceasefire with them. He's in the same position Arafat was in for 20 years. Nothing is changed. He has to negotiate with them because there are too many of them.

    What he has to do, let's face it, is lie to them. He has to get them to stop killing long enough to get a Palestinian state in place, and the only way he can do that is to tell them that the Palestinian state is a temporary arrangement, and once that's set up, he'll continue the struggle to get back all of historical Palestine. That's the only message they want to hear. Anything short of that is telling them, "Blow somebody up."

    There's a better way. It would take statesmen. It would take heroic men and women. It would work like this:

    Once the peace process begins, all killings go unavenged.

    The victims are mourned. Warrants are issued for the killers, but only as a police matter. The model here is Gandhi, not Ben-Gurion. The goal is to save millions of lives in the future by ignoring the cruel inhuman deaths of a few today. On the day after an attack, the nation would worship, not kill.

    "But Israel has a right to defend itself!"

    Yes it does. It can exercise that right. No one is going to step in to stop Israel from doing that, least of all the United States. According to this plan, Israel would voluntarily abdicate that right for a time. Israel would say "Today we break the cycle."

    "But the Palestinians should do the same thing!"

    They should but they can't. They've got Timothy McVeighs on every street corner, and it only takes one. They won't have the apparatus to root them out until they become a nation. It's like living on a remote farm with a homicidal maniac in your house. You have to tell him what a nice man he is until the area is built up and the sheriff puts in a sub-station--then you can bring in the SWAT team and get rid of him.

    Israel would abase itself for a few months in order to have peace for many years. On the first day of the peace talks, if 17 people are killed at a suicide bombing in a shopping mall, the negotiators would be sworn to continue. They can condemn the bombers. They can search for the ringleaders. But their overall message would be, "We know this was not an act of the Palestinian people. This was the act of a criminal gang. We need to hurry the peace process so you can clean up your country."

    The second thing Israel would have to agree to do is refrain from issuing loaded challenges to Abbas designed to make him lose face. In a region where the spoken word carries incredible power, you can't be constantly screaming "Condemn the terror! Condemn Hamas! Condemn it all! If you don't, we'll know you're a liar!"

    Yes, he's a liar. He has to be a liar. He has to appear strong among his own people even when he's weak. He has to convince a deeply divided society that he loves all of them, even the crazies. He can't be constantly undercutting his political future by making his own people think he's a traitor or a collaborator with the Israelis. He has to be a public Iron Man-- while he collaborates with the Israelis.

    Ask him to condemn the terror privately. Don't ask him to make speeches about it.

    "But you're asking Israel to be passive so that these killers can establish a powerful state that can then operate terror against them continually."

    Not at all. Once the state is established, it will be easier to control the terror, not harder, especially with the United States' new get-tough policy with any Middle Eastern leaders who harbor criminals. Once a real Palestinian government is in place, it will be held to the same standard as any other nation that plays footsie with terrorists.

    "You have no right to ask Israel to stand down! We are the victims! We are the targets! We have no suicide bombers of our own!"

    Israel must stand down because Israelis have the more mature civilization. Israel must stand down because they've advanced farther along the path of modernity than the Palestinians have. Israel must stop acting like a Ph.D. candidate in morality demanding virtue from a nine-year-old child.

    The common wisdom is that "both sides must compromise." Actually it's not even true. If one side compromises enough, the compromise can cover both. It's the whole principle behind "turn the other cheek," which Jesus popularized, but which scholars have noted was not original with him. It came from the ancient rabbis.
     
  2. GladiatoRowdy

    GladiatoRowdy Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2002
    Messages:
    16,596
    Likes Received:
    496
    Great article with lots of good points. It is absolutely true that if there is to be peace between Israelis and Palestinians, the retaliation and one-upsmanship needs to end. The only logical place for it to end is with Israel because, as was mentioned in the article, they are the legitimate state that is involved in this conflict. If you are going to kill the people involved in the attacks, they should be executed after they are arrested, charged, tried, and convicted of murder.
     
  3. Mr. Clutch

    Mr. Clutch Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2002
    Messages:
    46,550
    Likes Received:
    6,132
    The problem is it won't end just because Israel stops the so-called "one upmaniship."
     
  4. mrpaige

    mrpaige Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2000
    Messages:
    8,831
    Likes Received:
    15
    He acknowledges that but just thinks it will be easier to deal with a Palestinian state in terms of dealing with the terrorists that dwell within their borders, etc.

    I think he's being honest in noting that those whose goal is the destruction of Israel will still exist even after a Palestinian state is created. Hopefully, their ability to recruit will go down at least a little when there's a Palestinian state, but that element certainly won't be eliminated.
     
  5. Major

    Major Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 1999
    Messages:
    41,683
    Likes Received:
    16,209
    He acknowledges that but just thinks it will be easier to deal with a Palestinian state in terms of dealing with the terrorists that dwell within their borders, etc.

    Plus, if they have their own state, a nice straight border (instead of the goofy stuff previously proposed), Israel can effectively seal off their border (with a wall, if they want) and arrest anyone who tries to cross. That keeps suiciders out pretty effectively.
     
  6. Mr. Clutch

    Mr. Clutch Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2002
    Messages:
    46,550
    Likes Received:
    6,132
    Is a straight border possible? I know the populations are quite mixed up geographically.
     
  7. GreenVegan76

    GreenVegan76 Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2003
    Messages:
    3,336
    Likes Received:
    1
    Good point.

    Until there's a fundamental change in the attitudes toward each other, there's no solution that will work. What a mess -- killing each other for religion and retaliation. :(
     
  8. StupidMoniker

    StupidMoniker I lost a bet

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2001
    Messages:
    16,172
    Likes Received:
    2,826
    They can do that now (they ARE doing that now) and they don't have to give up anything. I don't know what fantasy world Joe Bob and his ilk are living in, but here on planet earth it is very rare to get something for nothing, or to be a little more straight to the point for a nation to give up a lot, especially territory, without getting SOMETHING in return. Until the Palestinians have something to offer (most likely a guarantee of security), dont look for this conflict to end peacefully.
     
  9. mrpaige

    mrpaige Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2000
    Messages:
    8,831
    Likes Received:
    15
    But there's no way the Palestinians could ever offer a guarantee of security. It's not possible. Even if the majority of Palestinians are all for it, it only takes one lone nut to end such a guarantee (that's not to say there's only one lone nut among the Palestinians, I'm just saying that's all it would take).
     
  10. StupidMoniker

    StupidMoniker I lost a bet

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2001
    Messages:
    16,172
    Likes Received:
    2,826
    There would simply be a system in place whereby every breach of security would require the payment of some sort of reparation, be it in money, land, or otherwise. That is what I mean by a guarantee of security. The Palestinian state would not be saying that no further acts of terrorism would ever take place, only that they would take responsibility and make amends as appropriate. That would be my quick and dirty solution to the problem.
     
  11. mrpaige

    mrpaige Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2000
    Messages:
    8,831
    Likes Received:
    15
    I could see that, but isn't that a post-state solution rather than a pre-state solution? That sort of thing could still be part of what Joe Bob suggested.

    The big point is that the process can't be allowed to be derailed every time somebody takes it upon himself (or herself) to go and do a suicide bombing, even if that person is part of a larger terrorist group.
     

Share This Page