Those two tweets are very well done. Looking at the approval ratings of the two presidents at the times of their inauguration, those headlines seem accurate for each particular president.
Your post is bullshit just like those tweets. AP is supposed to be a news gathering coop, way too many adjectives in those tweets. Just tell folks who, what, where, and when.
Except the facts are that Obama had a far greater approval rating at the time of his inauguration than Trump does now. Those are facts as well.
I am not sure what adjectives you are whining about. Actually there aren't even any adjectives in those tweets! What a F-tard.
He's not but he's not the facking AP ffs. Tweets have nothing to do with approval ratings. The word approval and ratings not even in the tweets. Pulsing, history, draws, masses, are used very cleverly to describe (that's what adjectives do) the sentence discussing the upcoming scene. The same goes for clog, revelers, rally-goers. So yes, while not adjectives describing words the words function as adjectives describing the sentence. AP members are seasoned, highly educated, masters of the English language, who are experts in writing. They know exactly what they are doing. If you 3 think those tweets are accidental or not intentional that's says a whole lot about yourself.
Do you even post your own content anymore? I haven't seen a take from you in a while? What is this tweet trying to explain? That Trump is a peice of ****? When did you become liberal?
Trump (and supporters like Commodore) can always go to Fox News for comfort Opinion Continue to Opinion › Sean Hannity: President Crybaby's blame game ends with whimper by Sean Hannity Rachel Campos-Duffy, Jason Crye: Why Latino parents have a friend in Trump and DeVos by Rachel Campos-Duffy Texas Attorney General: Obama's concerns about poor Americans losing their health care is... by Ken Paxton Greg Gutfeld: Stone Age liberals by Greg Gutfeld
First of all, Pulsing is a verb. Second, the rest of those words are nows. I think you need to look up adjective in the dictionary here. Second of all - I seriously doubt that the person who was handling the AP's twitter feed four years ago is the same person doing it today. You act like the AP is this monolithic entity. I am not sure you know how corporations work. They are run by people - people who change roles very frequently.
You haven't figured ipaman out yet? I've stated it multiple times. He's like a 15 year old who just discovered the concept of skeptism.
Cool, I've figured you guys out too. You're the guys who don't say much because you're mouths are full of libcockandballs but when you're really triggered you're remove them to speak out but promptly reinsert them in your mouths because that's how you're most comfortable.
Only if you believe that Obama and Trump deserve equal critisism based in merit rather than this odd notion that every side has exactly equal merit. Is there more merit in the clam that Trump is a vapid shell of a man with zero indivudal merit and no beliefs other than how to **** beautiful women and obtain more money while a world leader with diametrically oposed interests to the US saw it beneficial to his cause to atleast help him be the cheif executive of the nation with diametrically opposed interests or is there more merit in Obama being a secret Kenyan born Muslim who wants to slowly install Sharia law to this nation?
LOL... sure, if you want to make that comparison. Works for me. Still shows media treatment of Trump is not different.
Yeah... The same polls that are saying his approval rating is low predicted Hilary to be our next president by a large amount... and CNN is an unbiased news source... just like Fox.
Don't think you can compare the voting polls and favorability polls. The election polling under counted Trump in large part because so many republicans were afraid to admit they were going to vote for Trump. Heck, even after the election republicans are refusing to admit they voted for him.
Lol, yeah, Trump is actually super popular across the country. Wow, where do people like you come from. It can't be earth.
I still stand my original prediction that the media will destroy Trump's presidency. It was clear to me then as it is clear to me now; no president can win a war against his country's mainstream media. Every day, there is a new devastating report, sometimes two in the same day like today. Washington Post and New York Times taking turns: Trump made a huge mistake declaring open hostility towards the media by calling it "fake news" which painted a target on his back. Now, the media is leading a coordinated effort to create leaks and develop sources in his government. Every reporter Trump calls out, is in turn galvanized to dig deeper and harder into his administration. The result is a tag-team of reporters going after Trump like a pack of wolves sniffing blood. Trump will run of political capital before the media ever runs out of ink.
Yeah, it isn't that him doing what he has done has hurt him, it's that it's been reported. So unfair. So sad.
