1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Ringo Starr

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout' started by Drewdog, Oct 19, 2003.

?

Ringo Starr

  1. Luckiest b*stard in the world

    24 vote(s)
    42.9%
  2. Bonafide talent behind the drum kit

    32 vote(s)
    57.1%
  1. Drewdog

    Drewdog Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2000
    Messages:
    6,099
    Likes Received:
    7
    I think he pretty much sucks. I didnt really see anything creative with his drumming.....
     
  2. studogg

    studogg Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2002
    Messages:
    6,057
    Likes Received:
    2,661
    just to touch on this lightly drew, ringo wasn't a drummer until he was put into the beatles so therefore his early drumming was a bit primitive, and while he never became a structuralist like bonnom (sp?) he was able to think outside of the box and put some really wonderful beats down. The beatles were a group of extraordinarily talented musicians. It was not just John and Paul. So my overall feeling is that he was a badass and I wish my drumming were as good as his.
     
  3. Nuggets4

    Nuggets4 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 1999
    Messages:
    2,928
    Likes Received:
    32
    Most talented? Hell no. However, the man simply knew what to play when. He knew what would just feel right in a song and did it, and never anything more.

    You put someone like Carter Beauford behind the Beatles, and the band is not NEARLY as good as they were as that style of playing would take away from the song, where as Ringo just fit everything perfectly.
     
  4. LeGrouper

    LeGrouper Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2002
    Messages:
    2,423
    Likes Received:
    5
    Actually Studogg Ringo was an established drummer before the Beatles.

    My take on him as a drummer is this - is he a technical genius - no. Was he the perfect drummer for the Beatles - yes. The reason is that he had just the right amount of agreeability in a group full of superstars that the band could gel. He also had great innate timing and did not drown out the Beatles melodies with overbearing fills. His fills were subtle and supportive.

    If you get down to it none of the Beatles were really amazing at anything except songwritting. They were decent singers, guitar players, and musicians but they were amazing composers. Composition is the most important thing for musicians. That is how you get complete crap guitar players and singers (Kurt Cobain, Billy Corgan, Green Day) and they become huge stars. They now how to compose.

    There are several unknown musicians with technical talent that far surpasses many popular acts but you will never hear of them because they can't compose.
     
  5. Nomar

    Nomar Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2000
    Messages:
    4,429
    Likes Received:
    2
    Cobain = Mozart.

    Also...

    1999 Pedro Martinez = Mozart.
     
  6. BobFinn*

    BobFinn* Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2000
    Messages:
    11,438
    Likes Received:
    6
    As LeGrouper stated, Ringo was an established drummer way before he ever joined the Beatles. He was the drummer for the best band in Liverpool at that time, Rory Storm and the Hurricanes. And Ringo was the best drummer in Liverpool as well.

    Very underrated drummer.

    George Martin (Beatles producer) stated several years ago that he and several other Beatle historians went back and listened to most of the tapes from the recording sessions at Abbey Road from 1963-1970 and the one thing that stood out to all of them was that Ringo was damn near perfect on every one of those recordings. Every song that broke down was caused by either John, Paul or George, never Ringo. Simply amazing.
     
  7. Sister Ray

    Sister Ray Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2003
    Messages:
    48
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ringo was definitely a great drummer. Listen to his drumming on songs as diverse as "Rain" and "A Day in a Life," as well as all of the snappy early beat music. He was great.
     
  8. ima_drummer2k

    ima_drummer2k Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2002
    Messages:
    36,425
    Likes Received:
    9,374
    Decent drummer. Incredible musician.


    Great first name...
     
  9. Nuggets4

    Nuggets4 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 1999
    Messages:
    2,928
    Likes Received:
    32
    A little off-topic, but I know a few years ago that Bernard Perdie claimed that he played on a few of the Beatle's tracks and never got credit for it. Said he was gonna come out with a book.

    I haven't heard of anything since then though. Doubt it was true anyway.
     
  10. bamaslammer

    bamaslammer Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2003
    Messages:
    3,853
    Likes Received:
    4
    He was kind of like the Trent Dilfer of drummers. Perfectly competent, not a superstar, but imagine the group without him. He was perfect for them as he was an excellent timekeeper.
     
  11. FranchiseBlade

    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2002
    Messages:
    51,814
    Likes Received:
    20,474
    Thank you for bringing up Rain. That was some great drumming. Was he the greatest drum virtuoso? No. Did he do some creative things, add the right parts at the right times to the songs? Yes. He gets a bum rap by a lot of people, but the guy was steady. And he also popularized the kind of broken drum roll as a fill. Instead of rolling straight through the fill, he popularized breaking up the roll. Ringo also swings.
     
  12. Rane

    Rane Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2003
    Messages:
    165
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ringo is one of the freaking BEATLES!

    Case closed.
     
  13. TheHorns

    TheHorns Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2002
    Messages:
    1,774
    Likes Received:
    0
    Very basic stuff. Not a Beatles fan at all but do acknowledge that they were a huge influence to many and were certainly a talented group of musicians and ESPECIALLY song writers!
     
  14. TheHorns

    TheHorns Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2002
    Messages:
    1,774
    Likes Received:
    0
    Very basic stuff. Not a Beatles fan at all but do acknowledge that they were a huge influence to many and were certainly a talented group of musicians and ESPECIALLY song writers!
     
  15. BigM

    BigM Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2001
    Messages:
    18,091
    Likes Received:
    13,366
    lol, but true. the guy isn't john bonham but what would the beatles need with john bonham anyway. for your poll i choose both,i mean of course he's lucky, he played with maybe the two greatest songwriters ever, but he earned his spot. ringo was absolutely perfect to the songs and to the image.
     
  16. The Voice of Reason

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2000
    Messages:
    1,915
    Likes Received:
    1
    The most important thing about ringo is how he played. Any drummer who lookes at him playes sees nothing special. the truth is that he created the modern style of playing on a kit.

    he just picked up the sticks and played. This is the style all rock drummers use today. Before him it was more like what you see jazz drummers do.

    for this simple reason he is the man.
     
  17. KellyDwyer

    KellyDwyer Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2001
    Messages:
    3,660
    Likes Received:
    86
    Two words: "Sexy Sadie."
     
  18. jo mama

    jo mama Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2002
    Messages:
    14,601
    Likes Received:
    9,118
    as much as ill make fun of billy-wearing-a-black-cape era pumpkins was, he was quite a ripping guitar player. have you ever heard gish? thats him bustin out all those hendrix esque solos. you are right about his voice though...its crap.

    in answer to the above querry, i would say its a little bit of ringo being the luckiest b*stard in the world for stumbling into the beatles and the fact that he was indeed a talented and CREATIVE melodic drummer.

    he was lucky b/c he joined the beatles right before they exploded. it really didnt matter who the drummer was, they were going to be who they became. ringo was in the right place at the right time. and i always thought that he was already an established drummer who was known about town for his solid backbeat.

    however, although he never rocked it like john bonham, ringo definately had a unique and subtle style all his own. he never overplayed on a song. tastefulness like his is a rare quality in a drummer. ringo gave each song what it needed and nothing more.

    he as influenced as many drummers as anyone else out there. what he was doing, especially in the later years was pretty creative and pushing the boundaries of drumming in terms of his melodic approach to playing. sure, the drum solo on "the end" is kind of puny when compared to say "moby dick", but its ringo for gods sake! ringo!

    i couldnt imagine anyone else playing drums for the beatles. god save ringo and god save the queen!
     
  19. jo mama

    jo mama Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2002
    Messages:
    14,601
    Likes Received:
    9,118
    i saw an interview where he said that rain was his best drumming.
     
  20. LeGrouper

    LeGrouper Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2002
    Messages:
    2,423
    Likes Received:
    5
    Hmm...no. I own gish, love the album, but Billy has no technical ability. He is extremely creative and comes across as having a unique and complex sound, but if Billy was invited to a jam session with some of the Houston jazz musicians he would eventually be asked to sit out. Don't forget how much manipulating you can do in the studio.
     

Share This Page