Stop and Frisk was effective way to prevent violence in the black community but of course liberals care more about "ma feelings" then dead black youths.
Nope, muchacho. Liberals care more about American ideals, justice, and the constitution of the United States of America. Turning the United States into a police state might decrease some crimes but nobody would be better off for that.
WHATTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT Man you must be 12 years old..... I will just go 40's, 50's and don't forget the 60's
A FEDERAL judge deemed it unconstitutional. You think you understand constitutional law better than that federal judge? Why do you not believe in the 4th amendment?
People are saying you're on disability. Are you a beneficiary of Trump Foundation? I've googled some things and I'd be concerned about the checks bouncing.
I'm asking this based on your posting history and not as a snarky comment. Are you sure the United States is where you want to live? This isn't the first unconstitutional thing you've shown support for in your posts. You supported the unconstitutional idea of ideological tests for immigration. You support the idea of the unconstitutional stop and frisk policy. You supported the idea of a halt to immigration based on religion which is of course against the first amendment. etc. In a short amount of time you have taken issue with a lot of our constitution. Is the United States which is governed by that constitution something you believe in?
Stop and frisk is very unconstitutional... just another way of profiling and that's why the judge voted it downin new york... T_Man
"of course there were racism" wow. I'm spending time in my life reading drivel from absolute idiots on here. between this and "premium posts" that are in my signature. sheeesh
STATEMENT BY FORMER CAREER AMBASSADORS AND SENIOR STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIALS The undersigned have each previously served the people of the United States as career diplomats in our nation’s Foreign and Civil Services. We have each had the privilege of being nominated by the President, and confirmed by the United States Senate, to represent our nation abroad and at the highest levels of our foreign policy and security organizations. Together, we have represented the United States as ambassadors in 52 countries or international organizations. We have hundreds of years of combined service. As career officers, we have served every President since Harry Truman, and have proudly represented every President since Richard Nixon as ambassadors or senior State Department officials in Senate-confirmed positions. We have served Republican and Democratic Presidents with pride and enthusiasm. None of us will vote for Donald J. Trump. Each of us endorses Hillary Clinton and Tim Kaine. Because the stakes in this election are so high, this is the first time many of us have publicly endorsed a candidate for President. Very simply, this election is different from any election we can recall. One of the candidates — Donald J. Trump — is entirely unqualified to serve as President and Commander-in-Chief. He is ignorant of the complex nature of the challenges facing our country, from Russia to China to ISIS to nuclear proliferation to refugees to drugs, but he has expressed no interest in being educated. Indeed he has recently demonstrated he entirely misunderstands and disrespects the role of the very officials who could educate him: the senior career officers of our intelligence services and of our military services (whom he has characterized as “rubble”). In his frequent statements about foreign countries and their citizens, from our closest friends to our most problematic competitors, Mr. Trump has expressed the most ignorant stereotypes of those countries; has inflamed their people; and has insulted our allies and comforted our enemies. Shockingly, he has even offered praise and admiration for Vladimir Putin, the leader of Russia whose international activities and reported intrusions into our democratic political process have been among the most damaging actions taken by any foreign leader since the end of World War Two. We fear the damage that such ineptitude could cause in our closest relationships as well as the succor it might offer our enemies. By contrast, Hillary Clinton’s handling of foreign affairs has consistently sought to advance fundamental US interests with a deep grounding in the work of the many tens of thousands of career officers on whom our national security depends. Not every one of us has agreed with every decision she made (and the same would be true of every one of her predecessors), but we have profound respect for her skills, dedication, intelligence, and diplomacy. In this election there is only one team to represent our nation and lead our career foreign policy and security professionals in a manner befitting our role as the world’s sole superpower. Hillary Clinton and Tim Kaine are the candidates we support. Signatories (signed by 75 - exceeded limit)
Sorry, muchacho, but you don't get to change what's in the constitution just because you wish it were so. Since you either don't actually know what is in the constitution, and try to deny what's in the constitution when it is something you don't like, that is why I'm asking you if you truly want to live in a nation that is governed by that constitution? http://theweek.com/speedreads/65037...ck-stopandfrisk--even-though-unconstitutional
Brutal... If you're a Trumper you better keep your mom, sisters, aunts, and female cousins away from the television for a while.
So she isn't? That's a couple of degrees of separation there buddy. 1st degree of separation: It's alleged. 2nd degree of separation: She isn't BIll Clinton. Anyways, the message in the ad was about Trump's explicit misogyny that is easily heard by children. I doubt 10 year olds are going to research about Bill Clinton's p***y escapades and make link to Hillary Clinton and then attribute Hillary Clinton to an alleged rapist thus making rape okay. Only an adult partisan mind can come up with that type of mental gymnastics. A president having comments like women being flat chested cannot be beautiful is something that might influence a generation of 16 year old the_Donald posters which it already has. There is no degree of separation between Trump's draconian views on women and Trump. It comes right out of his garbage mouth. Anyways, I understand that the comment was more of a shitty attempt at snark so I understand not much thought was put into it.
First, people who enable or tolerate that kind of behavior are no better than those who commit the action. I've learned that this is true among drug addicts (alcoholics, pot heads, etc). Second, she wants to put him in a position of power - she has repeatedly said that much throughout her campaign. She also uses her husband to her advantage. What Bill did is no different than what Roger Ailes did - they are both rapists.
Oh, I love this. Yeah, none of Bill Clinton's unethical behavior will ever be written about. I'm surprised that even you or I know about it. LMAO
Bill Clinton was unfaithful to his marriage. That isn't a character hit on Hillary. It isn't hypocritical at all for a HILLARY supporter to call out the opposing candidate who makes EXPLICIT misogynist comments out of his own damn mouth. And small sound bites are far more influential to a young child's mind than delving into the infidelities of MR. Clinton. You are trying hard to find some hypocrisy but you are failing.
